Comparison of the USCOM ultrasound cardiac output monitor with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution in patients undergoing liver transplantation

Liver Transplantation

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1038-1043

  Wong, Lai Sze Grace ^a   Yong, Boon Hun ^a   Young, Karl Kang ^a   Lau, Lee Sung ^a   Cheng, King Lik ^a   Man, Jeff Siu Fan ^b   Irwin, Michael G ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOPPLER FLOWMETER; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FEMALE; HEART OUTPUT; HEART OUTPUT MEASUREMENT; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; LUNG ARTERY PRESSURE; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; THERMODILUTION; ULTRASONIC CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITOR; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AORTA; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CATHETERIZATION, SWAN-GANZ; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 48949119512     PISSN: 15276465     EISSN: 15276473     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lt.21483     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Tan HL, Pinder M, Parsons R, Roberts B, van Heerden PV. Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:287-291.
2. Nidorf SM, Picard MH, Triulzi MO, Thomas JD, Newell J, King ME, Weyman AE. New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:983-988.
3. Dey I, Sprivulis. Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas 2005;17:193-199.
4. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310.
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8:135-160.
6. Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N. Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anaesth 2006;20: 315-319.
7. Knobloch K, Lichtenberg A, Winterhalter M, Rossner D, Pichlmaier M, Phillips R. Non-invasive cardiac output determination by two-dimensional independent Doppler during and after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80:1479-1484.
8. Swan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. N Engl J Med 1970;283:447-451.
9. Williams G, Grounds M, Rhodes A. Pulmonary artery catheter. Curr Opin Crit Care 2002;8:251-256.
10. Weiner RS, Welch HG. Trends in the use of the pulmonary artery catheter in the United States, 1993-2004. JAMA 2007;298:423-429.
11. Rothenberg DM, Tuman KJ. Pulmonary artery catheter: what does the literature actually tell us? Int Anesthesiol Clin 2000;38:171-187.
12. Groeneveld ABJ, Berendsen RR, Schneider AJ, Pneumatikos IA, Stokkel LA, Thijs LG. Effect of the mechanical ventilatory cycle on thermodilution right ventricular volumes and cardiac output. J Appl Physiol 2000;89:89-96.
13. Stetz CW, Millar RG, Kelly GE, Raffin TA. Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982; 126: 1001-1004.
14. Marcelino P, Germano N, Marum S, Fernandes AP, Ribeiro P, Lopes MG. Haemodynamic parameters obtained by transthoracic echocardiography and Swan-Ganz catheter: a comparative study in liver transplant patients. Acta Med Port 2006;3:197-205.
15. Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Pompei L, Coccia C, Pietropaoli P. Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:350-356.