Exploring pedagogy with interactiue whiteboards in Australian schools

Australian Educational Computing

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 8-14

  Kearney, Matthew ^a   Schuck, Sandy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 56249144841     PISSN: 08169020     EISSN: 08169020     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Alexander, R. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. Thirsk: Dialogos.
2. Ayersman, D. (1996). Reviewing the research on hypermedia-based learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4-), 500-525.
3. Barab, S.A., Squire, K.D. & Dueber, W. (2000). A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 37-62.
4. BECTA (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.
5. Clarke, C. (2004) Secretary of State for Education and Skills Opening Address, BETT Conference, Olympia, 7 January 2004. Accessed 11 December 2006 from http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/community/webcasts/bett2004/transcripts/ clarke7jan04/.
6. CTGV (Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt). (1990). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. Educational Technology, 31(5), 34-40.
7. DfEE (1999). The national numeracy strategy: Framework for teaching mathematics. Cambridge: CUP.
8. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd ed. pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
9. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D. & Door, V. (2005). The interactive whiteboard: A literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2)
10. Hall, I. & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 21, 102-117.
11. Hedberg, J. (2006). E-learning futures? Speculations for a time yet to come. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 171-183.
12. Higgins, S., Clark, J., Falzon, C., Hall, I., Moseley, D., Smith, F., Smith, H. & Wall, K. (2005). Embedding ICT in the national literacy and numeracy strategies. Newcastle: University of Newcastle.
13. Kearney, M. & Schuck, S. (2006). Spotlight on authentic learning: Student developed digital video projects. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(2), 189-208.
14. Kennewell, S. (2006). Reflections on the interactive whiteboard phenomenon: a synthesis of research from the UK. Paper presented at the AARE conference, Adelaide, Australia, 26-30, November 2006.
15. Kershner, R. & Warwick, P. (2006). Replacement or transformation? Teacher research into learning processes associated with interactive whiteboard use in primary classrooms. Paper presented at BERA 2006 Annual Conference, Warwick University, September 2006.
16. Lee, M. & Boyle , M. (2003). The educational effects and implications of the interactive whiteboard strategy of Richardson primary school. Richardson Primary School: ACT Australia.
17. Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
18. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization for the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Miller, D.J., Averis, D., Door, V. & Glover, D. (2005). How can the use of an interactive whiteboard enhance the nature of teaching and learning in secondary mathematics and modern foreign languages? Report made to BECTA. Accessed 19 January 2007 from http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/ research/bursaries05/interactive_whiteboard.pdf
20. Mortimer, E.F. & Scott, P.H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
21. NSW Government, (19 June 2007). Budget 2007-8 Meeting our commitments. Dept. of Education and Training.
22. Radinsky, J., Bouillion, L., Lento, E. & Gomez, L. (2001). Mutual benefit partnership: A curricular design for authenticity. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(4), 405-430.
23. Reeves, T., Herrington, J. & Oliver, R. (2002). Authentic activities and online learning. In A. Goody, J. Herrington & M. Northcote (Eds.), Quality Conversations: Research and Development in Higher Education, 25, 562-567. Jamison, ACT: HERDSA.
24. Salomon, G. & Perkins, D. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1-24.
25. Schuck, S. & Kearney, M. (2007a). Exploring pedagogy with interactive whiteboards: A research report. Sydney: UTS. Accessed 10 October 2007 from http://www.ed-dev.uts.edu.au/teachered/research/iwbproject/ home.html
26. Schuck, S. & Kearney, M. (2007b, June). Disruptive or compliant? The impact of two educational technologies on pedagogy. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.) Proceedings of Ed-Media 2007 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications pp.2619-2626. Chesapeake, VA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
27. Smith, H.J., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91-101.
28. Vincent, J. (2007). The interactive whiteboard in an early years classroom: A case study in the impact of a new technology on pedagogy. Australian Educational Computing, 22(1), 20-25.