The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 5-20

  Glover, Derek ^a   Miller, David ^a   Averis, Douglas ^a   Door, Victoria ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847110689     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439880601141146     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Beauchamp, G. (2004) Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: towards an effective transition framework, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 327-348.
2. Beauchamp, G. & Parkinson, J. (2005) Beyond the 'wow' factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard, School Science Review, 86(316), 97-103.
3. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA) (2003) What research says about interactive whiteboards. Research reviews, paper No. 7 (Coventry, BECTA).
4. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA) (2004) Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard: a guide for secondary schools (Coventry, BECTA).
5. Beeland, W. D. (2002) Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive whiteboards help?, Action Research Exchange, 1(1). Available online at: http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/ beeland_am.pdf (accessed 13 September 2004).
6. Blanton, B. & Helms-Breazeale, R. (2000) Gains in self-efficacy: using SMART board interactive whiteboard technology in special education classrooms. Research report. Available online at: www.smarterkids.org.
7. Cathcart, R. & Olson, J. (1994) Teachers' and students' preferences for correction of classroom errors, in: R. Ellis (Ed.) The study of second language acquisition (Oxford, Oxford University Press), 47-53. (Original work published 1976).
8. Chenoweth, A., Day, R., Chun, A. & Luppescu, S. (1983) Attitudes and preferences of non-native speakers to corrective feedback, Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 79-87.
9. Cogill, J. (2003) The use of interactive whiteboards in the primary school: effects on pedagogy. Research bursary reports (Coventry, BECTA).
10. Cooper, B. & Brna, P. (2002) Supporting high quality interaction and motivation in the classroom using the social and emotional learning and engagement in the NIMS project, Education, Communication and Information, 2(4), 113-138.
11. Damcott, D., Landato, J. & Marsh, C. (2000) Report on the use of the SMART board interactive whiteboard in physical science. Research report. Available online at: www.smarterkids.org (accessed 13 September 2004).
12. Davison, I. & Pratt, D. (2003) An investigation into the visual and kinaesthetic affordances of interactive whiteboards. Research bursary reports (Coventry, BECTA).
13. Department for Education and Skills (2005) Guidelines on standards for advanced skills teachers (London, Department for Education and Skills).
14. Edwards, J., Hartnell, M. & Martin, R. (2002) Interactive whiteboards: some lessons for the classroom, Micro Math, 18(2), 30-34.
15. Gardner, H. (1991) The unschooled mind: how children think and how schools should teach (New York, Basic Books).
16. Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001a) A report to Blackburn and Colne EAZ on new technologies (Keele, Department of Education, Keele University).
17. Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001b) Missioners, tentatives and luddites: leadership challenges for school and classroom posed by the introduction of interactive whiteboards into schools in the UK, paper presented at the BEMAS Conference, Newport Pagnell, UK, 10-11 September.
18. Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001c) Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(30), 257-275.
19. Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2002) Running with technology: the impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257-276.
20. Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2003) Players in the management of change, Management in Education, 17(1), 20-24.
21. Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D. & Door, V. (2005) The interactive whiteboard: a literature survey, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-170.
22. Haldane, M. (2005) A typology of interactive whiteboard pedagogies, paper presented at the Promethean International IWB Research Conference, Wolverhampton, 2-3 July.
23. Iding, M. (2000) Is seeing believing? Features of effective multimedia for learning science, International Journal of Instructive Media, 27(4), 403-416.
24. Johnson, G. & Scholes, K. (1993) Exploring corporate strategy: text and cases (New York, Prentice Hall).
25. Jones, S. & Tanner, H. (2002) Teachers' interpretations of effective whole-class interactive teaching in secondary mathematics classrooms, Educational Studies, 28(3), 265-274.
26. Kennewell, S. (2001) Interactive whiteboards-yet another solution looking for a problem to solve?, Information Technology in Teacher Education, 39, 3-6.
27. Latane, B. (2002) Focused interactive learning: a tool for active class discussion, Teaching of Psychology, 29(1), 10-16.
28. Miller, D., Glover, D. & Averis, D. (2003) The impact of interactive whiteboards on classroom practice: examples drawn from the teaching of mathematics in secondary schools in England, paper presented at BRNO, Poznan, Poland, June.
29. Miller, D., Glover, D., Averis, D., Miller, D. & Glover, D. (2004) Enhancing mathematics teaching through new technology: the use of the interactive whiteboard. Summary of a report made to the Nuffield Foundation on completion of a funded two-year project (April 2002 to March 2004). Available online at: http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ed/iaw/nuffield.htm (accessed 6 June 2005). Moore, A. (2001) Interactive whiteboards-a luxury too far?, Teaching ICT, 1(2), 52-57.
30. Passey, D., Rogers C., Machell, J., McHugh, G. & Allaway, D. (2003) The motivational effect of ICT on pupils: emerging findings (London, Department for Education and Skills).
31. Robison, S. (2000) Math classes for the 21st century, Media and Methods, 36(4), 10-11.
32. Simpson, M., Payne, F., Munro, R & Lynch, E. (1998) Using information and communication technology as a pedagogical tool: a survey of initial teacher education in Scotland, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 7(3), 431-446.
33. Smith, H. (2001) Smartboard evaluation. Final report. Available online at: http://www.kented.org.uk/ngfl/whiteboards/report.html (accessed 11 October 2004).
34. Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005) Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
35. Terrell, I. & Capper, S. (2003) The Hedley Walter High School: cultural change in learning through the use of new technologies. Research bursary reports (Coventry, BECTA).