Initial in vitro interaction of osteoblasts with nano-porous alumina

Biomaterials

Volumn 24, Issue 18, 2003, Pages 3039-3046

  Karlsson, M ^a   Palsgard E ^a   Wilshaw, P R ^b   Di Silvio, L ^c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Hard tissue implant; Nano porous alumina; Osteoblasts

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ALUMINA; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); MORPHOLOGY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS;

CELL PROLIFERATION;

CELL CULTURE;

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; ALUMINUM OXIDE; CELL DNA; FIBRONECTIN; THYMIDINE; TITANIUM;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL ADHESION; CELL GROWTH; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME SYNTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; METAL IMPLANTATION; OSTEOBLAST; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PHENOTYPE; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; WESTERN BLOTTING; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 0043128744     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00146-7     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Finerman G.A.M., Dorey F.J., Grigoris P., McKellop H.A. Total hip arthroplasty outcomes. 1998;Churchill Livingstone, New York.
2. Hulbert S. An introduction to bioceramics: the use of alumina and zirconia in surgical implants. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 1993. p. 25-40.
3. Hench L.L. Bioceramics. from concept to clinic J Am Ceram Soc. 74:1991;1487-1510.
4. Hulbert S.F., Young F.A., Matthews R.S., Klawitter J.J., Tolbert C.D., Stelling G.H. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantible skeletal prosthesis. J Biomed Mater Res. 4:1970;433-456.
5. Frakes J.T., Brown S.D., Kenner G.H. Delayed failure and ageing of porous alumina in water and physiological media. Am Ceram Soc Bull. 53(2):1974;183-187.
6. Ritter J.E., Greenspan D.C., Palmer R.A., Hench L.L. Use of fracture mechanics theory in lifetime predictions for alumina and bioglass coated alumina. J Biomed Mater Res. 13:1979;251-263.
7. Christel P, Meunier A, Dorlot J-M, Crolet J-M, Witvoet J, Sedel L, Boutin P. Bioceramics. In: Ducheyne P, Lemons JE, editors. Material characteristics versus in vivo behavior: biomechanical compatibility and design of ceramic implants for orthopedic surgery. New York, NY: The New York Academy of Science, 1988. p. 234-56.
8. Hench L.L. Anderson O.H., Yli-Urpo A. Bioactive ceramics: theory and clinical applications in bioceramics-7. 1994;3-14 Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, England.
9. Hamadouche M., Meunier A., Greenspan D.C., Blanchat C., Zhong J.P., La Torre G., Sedel L. Bioactivity of sol-gel bioactive glass coated alumina implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 52:2000;422-429.
10. Li Z., Kitsugi T., Yamamuro T., Chang Y., Senaha Y., Takagi H., Nakamura T., Oka M. Bone-bonding behaviour under load bearing conditions of an alumina ceramic implant incorporating beads coated with glass-ceramic containing apatite and wollastonite. J Biomed Mater Res. 29:1995;1081-1088.
11. Hamadouche M., Meunier A., Greenspan D.C., Blanchat C., Zhong J.P., La Torre G.P., Sedel L. Bioactivity of bioactive sol-gel glasses coated alumina implants. Key Eng Mater. 192-195:2001;413-416.
12. Hench LL, Andersson Ö. An introduction to bioceramics: bioactive glass coatings. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 1993. p. 239-59.
13. Hamadouche M, Nizard RS, Meunier A, Blanchat C, Masquelier P, Sedel L. Osteoconductive properties of bioactive glasses in a bulk form and as a coating on alumina. In: Le Geros RZ, Le Geros JP, editors. Bioceramics II. New Jersey: World Scientific Publishing, 1998. p. 427-30.
14. Gross U, Schmitz H-J, Strunz V. Bioceramics. In: Ducheyne P, Lemons JE, editors. Material characteristics versus in vivo behavior: surface bioactivity of bioactive glass, aluminium oxide and titanium in a living environment. New York, NY: The New York Academy of Science, 1988. p. 211-26.
15. Furneaux R., Rigby W.R., Davidson A.P. The formation of controlled-porosit membranes from anodically oxidized aluminium. Nature. 337:1989;147-149.
16. Bowen W.R., Hilal N., Lovitt R.W., Williams P.M. Atomic force microscopy studies of membranes. surface pore structure of cyclopore and anopore membrane J Membr Sci. 110:1996;233-238.
17. Jessensky O., Muller M., Gösele U. Self-organized formation of hexagonal pore structures in anodig alumina. J Electrochem Soc. 145:1998;11:3735.
18. Thompson G.E. Porous anodic alumina. fabrication, characterization and applications Thin Solid Films. 297:1997;192-201.
19. Di Silvio L, PhD thesis, University of London, 1995.
20. Nakayama G.R., Caton M.C., Nova M.P., Parandoosh Z. Assessment of the Alamar Blue assay for cellular growth and viability in Vitro. J Immunol Methods. 204:1997;205-208.
21. Rago R., Mitchen J., Wilding G. DNA fluorometric assay in 96-well tissue culture plates using Hoechst 33258 after cell lysis by freezing in distilled water. Anal Biochem. 191:1990;31-34.
22. Millipore Corporation: the multiscreen assay system for cell proliferation assay using thymidine uptake. Millipore Technical Brief TB038, 1991.
23. Di Silvio L, Gurav N. Human cell culture, vol. 5. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001. p. 221-41.
24. Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 277:1970;680-685.
25. Gottlieb M., Chavoko M. Silver staining of native and denatured eucaryotic DNA in agarose gel. Anal Biochem. 165:1987;33-37.
26. Brunette W.N. Western blotting. electrophoretic transfer of proteins from SDS-PAGE gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibodies radioiodinated protein A Anal Biochem. 112:1981;195-203.
27. Lanzerotti L.J., Brown W.L., Poate J.M., Augustyniak W.M. Nucleation and growth of porous anodic films on aluminium. Nature. 272:1978;433-435.
28. Webster T.J., Ergun C., Doremus R.H., Siegel R.W., Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials. 21:2000;1803-1810.
29. Webster T.J., Ergun C., Doremus R.H., Siegel R.W., Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res. 51(3):2000;475-483.
30. Webster T.J., Ergun C., Shadler L.S., Siegel R.W., Bizios R. Mechanism of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng. 7:2001;291-301.
31. Kasemo B., Gold J. Implant surfaces and interface processes. Adv Dent Res. 13:1999;8-20.
32. Talwar H.S., Reddi A.H., Menczel J., Thomas W.C., Meyer J.L. Influences of aluminium on mineralisation during matrix-induced bone development. Kidney Int. 29:1986;1038-1042.
33. Goodmman W.G., O'Connor J. Aluminium alters calcium influx and efflux from bone in vitro. Kidney Int. 39:1991;602-607.
34. Blumenthal N.C., Posner A.S. In vitro model of aluminium induced osteomalacia. inhibition of hydroxyapatite formation Cacif Tissue Int. 36:1984;439-441.
35. William Lau K.H., Yoo A., Wang S.P. Aluminium stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts in vitro by a mechanism that is different from fluoride. Mol Cell Biochem. 105:1991;93-105.
36. Quarles LD, Castillo SA, Drezner MK. Aluminium induced replication of osteoblast precursors: a potential mechanism underlying neo-osteogenisis. J Bone Miner Res 1989;4(Suppl. 1):S131 (Abstract 54).
37. Jones T.R., Antionetti D.L., Reid T.W. Aluminium ions stimulate mitosis in murine cells in tissue culture. J Cell Biochem. 30:1986;31-39.
38. Zreiqat H., Standard O.C., Gengenbach T., Steele J.G., Howlett C.R. The role of surface characteristics in the initial adhesion of human bone-derived cells on ceramics. Cells Mater. 6:1996;45-56.
39. Horbett T.A. The role of adsorbed proteins in animal cell adhesion. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2:1994;225-240.
40. Moursi A.M., Damsky C.H., Lull J., Zimmerman D., Doty S.B., Aota S., Globus R.K. Fibronectin regulates calvarial osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Sci. 109:1996;1369-1380.
41. Moursi A.M., Globus R.K., Damsky C.H. Interactions between integrin receptors and fibronectin are required for calvarial osteoblast differentiation in vitro. J Cell Sci. 110:1997;2187-2196.
42. Globus R.K., Doty S.B., Lull J., Holmuhamedov E., Humphries M.J., Damsky C.H. Fibronectin is a survival factor for differentiated osteoblasts. J Cell Sci. 111:1998;1385-1393.
43. Bergkvist M, Carlsson J, Oscarsson S. Surface dependent conformations of human plasma fibronectin adsorbed to silica, mica and hydrophobic surfaces, studied with Atomic Force Microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;64A(2):349-56.
44. Grinell F., Feld M.K. Adsorption characteristics of plasma fibronectin in relationship to biological activity. J Biomed Mater Res. 15:1981;363-381.
45. Garcia A.J., Ducheyne P., Boettiger D. Effect of surface reaction stage on fibronectin-mediated adhesion of osteoblast-like cells to bioactive glass. J Biomed Mater Res. 40:1998;48-56.
46. Abdessamand N, Harmand MF. Cytocompability of two coating materials, amorphous alumina and silicon-carbide, using human differentiated cell cultures. Biomaterials 1991;12:690-4.