Comparison of multimarker logistic regression models, with application to a genomewide scan of schizophrenia

BMC Genetics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Wason, James M S ^a   Dudbridge, Frank ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MARKER;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME; HAPLOTYPE; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SIMULATION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL MODEL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; METHODOLOGY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, GENETIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 77956486969     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-80     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. National institute of health GWAS website. , http://www.genome.gov/GWAStudies/
2. Maher B. The case of the missing heritability. Nature 2008, 456:18-21. 10.1038/456018a, 18987709.
3. McClellan J, Sussier E, King M. Schizophrenia: a common disease caused by multiple rare alleles. British Journal of Psychiatry 2007, 190:194-199. 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.025585, 17329737.
4. Browning S. Missing data imputation and haplotype phase inference for genome-wide association studies. Hum Genet 2008, 124:439-450. 10.1007/s00439-008-0568-7, 2731769, 18850115.
5. 1000 Genomes project website. , http://www.1000genomes.org
6. Dudbridge F, Gusnanto A. Estimation of significance thresholds for genomewide association scans. Genetic Epidemiology 2008, 32:227-234. 10.1002/gepi.20297, 2573032,2573032, 18300295.
7. Hoggart C, Clark T, De Iorio M, Whittaker J, Balding D. Genome-wide significance for dense SNP and resequencing data. Genetic Epidemiology 2008, 32:179-185. 10.1002/gepi.20292, 18200594.
8. Chapman J, Cooper JD, Todd TA, Clayton D. Detecting disease associations due to linkage disequilibrium using haplotype tags: a class of tests and the determinants of statistical power. Hum Hered 2003, 56:18-31. 10.1159/000073729, 14614235.
9. Clayton D, Chapman J, Cooper J. Use of unphased multilocus genotype data in indirect association studies. Genetic Epidemiology 2004, 27:415-428. 10.1002/gepi.20032, 15481099.
10. Balding D. A tutorial on statistical methods for population association studies. Nature Reviews Genetics 2006, 7:781-791. 10.1038/nrg1916, 16983374.
11. Kim Y, Feng S, Zeng Z. Measuring and partitioning the high-order linkage disequilibrium by multiple order Markov chains. Genetic Epidemiology 2008, 32:301-312. 10.1002/gepi.20305, 18330903.
12. Humphreys K, Iles M. Fine-scale mapping in case-control samples using locus scoring and haplotype-sharing methods. BMC Genet 2005, 6(Suppl 1):1-5. 10.1186/1471-2156-6-S1-S74, 545062, 15634360.
13. Clayton D, Jones H. Transmission/Disequilibrium tests for extended marker haplotypes. Am J Hum Gen 1999, 65:1161-1169.
14. Price A, Patterson N, et al. Principal componenents analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nature genetics 2006, 38:904-909. 10.1038/ng1847, 16862161.
15. Bacanu S, Devlin B, Roeder K. The power of genomic control. Am J Hum Gen 2000, 66:1933-1944.
16. Shi J, Levinson D, Duan J, et al. Common variants on chromosome 6p22.1 are associated with schizophrenia. Nature 2009, 460:753-757. 2775422, 19571809.
17. Schaffner S, Foo C, Gabriel S, Reich D, Daly MJ, Altshuler D. Calibrating a coalescent simulation of human genome sequence variation. Genome Research 2005, 15:1576-1583. 10.1101/gr.3709305, 1310645, 16251467.
18. Zaykin D, Westfall P, Young S, Karnoub M, Wagner M, Ehm M. Testing association of statistically inferred haplotypes with discrete and continuous traits in samples of unrelated individuals. Hum Hered 2001, 53:79-91.
19. Rakovski C, Stram D. A kinship-based modification of the Armitage trend test to address hidden population structure and small differential genotyping errors. PLoS one 2009, 4:e5825. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005825, 2688076, 19503792.
20. Purcell S, et al. PLINK: a toolset for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analysis. Am J Hum Gen 2007, 81:559-575.
21. Astle W, Balding D. Population structure and cryptic relatedness in genetic association studies. Statistical Science 2009, 24:451-471.
22. Dudbridge F. Likelihood-based association analysis for nuclear and unrelated subjects with missing genotype data. Human Heredity 2008, 66:87-98. 10.1159/000119108, 2386559, 18382088.
23. Browning S, Browning B. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Gen 2007, 81:1084-1097.
24. Chapman J, Clayton D. One degree of freedom for dominance in indirect association studies. Genetic Epidemiology 2007, 31:261-271. 10.1002/gepi.20207, 17266117.
25. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford T, Feinstein A. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1996, 12:1373-1379.
26. Durrant C, Zondervan K, Cardon L, Hunt S, Deloukas P, Morris A. Linkage disequilibrium mapping via cladistic analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphism haplotypes. Am J Hum Gen 2004, 75:35-43.
27. Waldron E, Whittaker J, Balding D. Fine mapping of disease genes via haplotype clustering. Genetic Epidemiology 2005, 30:170-179.
28. Morris A. A flexible Bayesian framework for modelling haplotype association with disease, allowing for dominance effects of the underlying causative variants. Am J Hum Genet 2006, 79:679-694. 10.1086/508264, 1592560, 16960804.
29. Tachmazidou I, Verzilli C, De Iorio M. Genetic association mapping via evolution-based clustering of haplotypes. PLoS Genetics 2004, 3:1163-1177.
30. Stram D, et al. Modeling and E-M estimation of haplotype specific relative risks from genotype data for a case-control study of unrelated individuals. Hum Hered 2003, 55:179-190. 10.1159/000073202, 14566096.
31. Kraft P, Cox D, Paynter R, Hunter D, De Vivo I. Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: a comparison of simple and flexible techniques. Genetic Epidemiology 2005, 28:261-272. 10.1002/gepi.20061, 15637718.
32. Cordell H. Estimation and testing of genotype and haplotype effects in case-control studies: comparison of weighted regression and multiple imputation procedures. Genetic Epidemiology 2006, 30:259-275. 10.1002/gepi.20142, 16496312.
33. Excoffier L, Slatkin M. Maximum likelihood estimation of molecular haplotype frequencies in a diploid population. Mol Biol Evol 1995, 12:921-927.
34. Kent J. Robust properties of likelihood ratio tests. Biometrika 1982, 69:19-27.
35. Rao CR. Large sample tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters with applications to problems of estimation. Proc Camb Phil 1948, 44:50.
36. Cordell H, Clayton D. A unified stepwise regression procedure for evaluating the relative effects of polymorphisms within a gene using case/control or family data: application to HLA in type 1 diabetes. Am J Hum Genet 2002, 70:124-141. 10.1086/338007, 384883, 11719900.
37. Balding D, Nichols R. A method for quantifying differentiation between populations a multi-allelicloci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity. Genetica 1995, 96:3-12. 10.1007/BF01441146, 7607457.
38. Cavalli-Sforza L, Menozzi P, Piazza A. The history and geography of human genes 1994, Princeton university press.
39. Devlin B, Roeder K. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 1999, 55:997-1004. 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00997.x, 11315092.
40. McCarthy M, Abecasis G, et al. Genome-wide association studies for complex traits: consensus, uncertainty and challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics 2008, 9:356-369. 10.1038/nrg2344, 18398418.
41. Genome-wide association study of 14000 cases of seven common diseases and 3000 shared controls. Nature 2007, 447:661-679. 10.1038/nature05911, 2719288, 17554300.
42. Clayon D, Walker N, et al. Population structure, differential bias and genomic control in a large-scale, case-control association study. Nature Genetics 2005, 37:1243-1246. 10.1038/ng1653, 16228001.
43. Weir B. Genetic data analysis II: methods for discrete population genetic data 1996, Sinaur associates.