Use of unphased multilocus genotype data in indirect association studies

Genetic Epidemiology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 415-428

  Clayton, David ^a,b   Chapman, Juliet ^a   Cooper, Jason ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Association studies; Gametic phase; Haplotype analysis; Linkage disequilibrium; Perfect phytogeny

Indexed keywords

CLADISTICS; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; GAMETE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; MARKER GENE; MODEL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETICS, POPULATION; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; HUMANS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 10044279127     PISSN: 07410395     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gepi.20032     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Breslow N, Day N. 1980. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume I: The analysis of case-control studies. IARC Scientific Publications. Lyon: IARC.
2. Brumfield R, Beerli P, Nickerson D, Edwards S. 2003. The utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms in inferences of population history. Trends Ecol Evol 18:249-256.
3. Carlson CS, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Yi Q, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. 2004. Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium. Am J Hum Genet 74:106-120.
4. Chapman JM, Cooper JD, Todd JA, Clayton DG. 2003. Detecting disease associations due to linkage disequilibrium using haplotype tags: a class of tests and the determinants of statistical power. Hum Hered 56:18-31.
5. Clayton D. 1999. A generalization of the transmission/disequilibrium test for uncertain haplotype transmission. Am J Hum Genet 65:1170-1177.
6. Clayton D, Jones H. 1999. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for extended marker haplotypes. Am J Hum Genet 65:1161-1169.
7. Dempster A, Laird N, Rubin D. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B 39:1-22.
8. Devlin B, Roeder K. 1999. Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55:997-1004.
9. Hosking J. 1983. Legrange multiplier tests. In: Encyclopedia of statistical sciences, vol. 4, New York: John Wiley & Sons. p 456-459.
10. Hotelling H. 1931. The generalization of student's ratio. Ann Math Stat 2:360-378.
11. International HapMap Consortium. 2003. The International HapMap project. Nature 426:789-796.
12. Johnson G, Esposito L, Barratt B, Smith A, Heward J, Di Genova G, Ueda H, Cordell H, Eaves I, Dudbridge F, Twells R, Payne F, Hughes W, Nutland S, Stevens H, Carr P, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Tuomilehto J, Gough S, Clayton D, Todd J. 2001. Haplotype tagging for the identification of common disease genes. Nat Genet 29:233-237.
13. Nelder J, Wedderburn R. 1972. Generalized linear models. J R Stat Soc Ser A 135:370-384.
14. Schaid D, Rowland C, Tines D, Jacobson R, Poland G. 2002. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am J Hum Genet 70:425-34.
15. Seltman H, Roeder K, Devlin B. 2001. Transmission/disequilibrium test meets measured haplotype analysis: family-based association analysis guided by evolution of haplotypes. Am J Hum Genet 68:1250-1263.
16. Stram D, Haiman C, Altshuler D, Kolonel L, Henderson B, Pike M. 2003. Choosing haplotype tagging SNPs based on unphased genotype data using a preliminary sample of unrelated subjects with an example from the multiethnic cohort study. Hum Hered 55:27-36.
17. Templeton A. 1995. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping or DNA sequencing. V. Analysis of case/control sampling designs: Alzheimer's disease and the apoprotein E locus. Genetics 140:403-409.
18. Templeton A, Sing C. 1993. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. IV. Nested analyses with cladogram uncertainty and recombination. Genetics 134:659-669.
19. Templeton A, Boerwinkle E, Sing C. 1987. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. I. Basic theory and an analysis of estimation. Genetics 119:343-351.
20. Templeton A, Sing C, Kessling A, Humphires S. 1988. A cladistic analysis of phenotype associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. II. The analysis of natural populations. Genetics 120:1145-1154.
21. Templeton A, Crandall K, Sing C. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequencing data III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619-633.
22. Tzeng JY, Devlin B, Roeder K, Wasserman L. 2003. On the identification of disease mutations by the analysis of haplotype matching and goodness-of-fit. Am J Hum Genet 72:891-902.
23. Tzeng JY, Byerley W, Devlin B, Roeder K, Wasserman L. 2004. Outlier detection and false discovery rates for whole-genome DNA matching. J Am Stat Assoc 98:236-247.
24. van der Meulen M, te Meerman G. 1997. Association and haplotype sharing due to identity by descent, with an application to genetic mapping. In: Pawlowitki I, Edwards J, Thompson E, editors. Genetic mapping of disease genes. London: Academic Press; p 115-136.
25. Wang W, Todd J. 2003. The usefulness of different density snp maps for disease association studies of common variants. Hum Mol Genet 12:3145-3149.
26. Wishart J. 1931. The mean and second moment coefficient of the multiple correlation coefficient in samples from a normal population. Biometrika 24:353-376.