A maleimide-based in-vitro model for ultrasound targeted imaging

Ultrasonics Sonochemistry

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 327-333

  Kang, Shih Tsung ^a   Yeh, Chih Kuang ^a  

^a NATIONAL TSING HUA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Gelatin phantom; Maleimide bubbles; Maleimide cysteine tethering; Ultrasound targeted imaging

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACIDS; PHANTOMS; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

ACOUSTIC RESPONSE; GELATIN PHANTOMS; MALEIMIDES; OPTICAL OBSERVATIONS; PREPARATION PROCEDURES; TARGETED IMAGING; ULTRASOUND IMAGING SYSTEMS; ULTRASOUND PULSE;

ADHESION;

CYSTEINE; GELATIN; MALEIMIDE;

ADHESION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VITRO STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 77956451075     PISSN: 13504177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.06.014     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Dijkmans P.A., Juffermans L.J.M., Musters R.J.P., Wamel A.Van., Ten Cate F.J., Gilst W.Van., Visser C.A., Jong N.de., Kamp O. Microbubbles and ultrasound: from diagnosis to therapy. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2004, 5:245-256.
2. Lindner J.R., Song J., Xu F., Klibanov A.L., Singbartl K., Ley K., Kaul S. Noninvasive ultrasound imaging of inflammation using microbubbles targeted to activated leukocytes. Circulation 2000, 102:2745-2750.
3. Willmann J.K., Paulmurugan R., Chen K., Gheysens O., Rodriguez-Porcel M., Lutz A.M., Chen I.Y., Chen X., Gambhir S.S. US imaging of tumor angiogenesis with microbubbles targeted to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 in mice. Radiology 2008, 246:508-518.
4. Weller G.E.R., Lu E., Csikari M.M., Klibanov A.L., Fischer D., Wagner W.R., Villanueva F.S. Ultrasound imaging of acute cardiac transplant rejection with microbubbles targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Circulation 2003, 108:218-224.
5. Lindner J.R. Contrast ultrasound molecular imaging of inflammation in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc. Res. 2009, 84:182-189.
6. Rychak J.J., Graba J., Cheung A.M.Y., Mystry B.S., Lindner J.R., Kerbel R.S., Foster F.S. Microultrasound molecular imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in a mouse model of tumor angiogenesis. Mol. Imaging 2007, 6:289-296.
7. Garbin V., Cojoc D., Ferrari E., Fabrizio E.D., Overvelde M.L.J., van der Meer S.M., de Jong N., Lohse D., Versluis M. Changes in microbubble dynamics near a boundary revealed by combined optical micromanipulation and high-speed imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90:114103.
8. Butler M.B., Thomas D.H., Pye S.D., Moran C.M. The acoustic response from individual attached and unattached rigid shelled microbubbles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93:223906.
9. Marsh J.N., Partlow K.C., Abendschein D.R., Scott M.J., Lanza G.M., Wickline S.A. Molecular imaging with targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles: quantification of the concentration dependence of contrast enhancement for binding to sparse cellular epitopes. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2007, 33:950-958.
10. Butler M.B., Moran C.M., Anderson T., Cunningham C., Ross J.A., Easson W.J., Fox K.A.A., McDicken W.N. Laser doppler anemometry measurements of the shear stresses on ultrasonic contrast agent microbubbles attached to agar. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2005, 31:545-552.
11. Zhao S., Kruse D.E., Ferrara K.W., Dayton P.A. Acoustic response from adherent targeted contrast agents. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120:EL 63-EL 69.
12. Lum A.F.H., Borden M.A., Dayton P.A., Kruse D.E., Simon S.I., Ferrara K.W. Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. J. Control Release 2006, 111:128-134.
13. Lanza G.M., Trousil R.L., Wallace K.D., Rose J.H., Hall C.S., Scott M.J., Miller J.G., Eisenberg P.R., Gaffney P.J., Wickline S.A. In vitro characterization of a novel, tissue-targeted ultrasonic contrast system with acoustic microscopy. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 104:3665-3672.
14. Gregory J.D. The stability of N-ethylmaleimide and its reaction with sulfhydryl groups. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77:3922-3923.
15. Klibanov A.L. Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 2005, 16:9-17.
16. Eastoe J.E. The amino acid composition of mammalian collagen and gelatin. Biochem. J. 1955, 61:589-600.
17. E.C. Unger, T.A. Fritz, T. Matsunaga, V. Ramaswami, D. Yellowhair, G. Wu, Methods of preparing gas-filled liposomes, U.S. Patent 5935553 (1999).
18. Goertz D.E., Frijlink M.E., De Jong N., Van Der Steen A.F.W. High frequency nonlinear scattering from a micrometer to submicrometer sized lipid encapsulated contrast agent. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006, 32:569-577.
19. Goertz D.E., Frijlink M.E., De Jong N., Van Der Steen A.F.W. Nonlinear intravascular ultrasound contrast imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2006, 32:491-502.
20. Foster F., Mehi J., Lukacs M., Hirson D., White C., Chaggares C., Needles A. A new 15-50MHz array-based micro-ultrasound scanner for preclinical imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2009, 35:1700-1708.
21. Yeh C.K., Lu S.Y., Chen Y.S. Microcirculation volumetric flow assessment using high-resolution contrast-assisted images. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2008, 55:74-83.
22. Yeh C.K., Chen J.J., Li M.L., Lu J.J., Chen J.J. In vivo imaging of blood flow in the mouse achilles tendon using high-frequency ultrasound. Ultrasonics 2009, 49:226-230.
23. Borden M.A., Kruse D.E., Caskey C.F., Zhao S., Dayton P.A., Ferrara K.W. Influence of lipid shell physicochemical properties on ultrasound-induced microbubble destruction. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2005, 52:1992-2002.
24. Getz E.B., Xiao M., Chakrabarty T., Cooke R., Selvin P.R. A comparison between the sulfhydryl reductants tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine and dithiothreitol for use in protein biochemistry. Anal. Biochem. 1999, 273:73-80.
25. Roy J., Chrétien M.N., Woodside B., English A.M. Reduction and S-nitrosation of the neuropeptide oxytocin: implications for its biological function. Nitric Oxide 2007, 17:82-90.
26. Frese R., Gröschel-Stewart U. On the stability of N-ethylmaleimide alkylated sulfhydrylgroups. Specialia 1972, 28:1013-1015.
27. Lee S., Mandic J., Van Vliet K.J. Chemomechanical mapping of ligand-receptor binding kinetics on cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:9609-9614.
28. Knight C.G., Green N.M. The accessibility of protein-bound dinitrophenyl groups to univalent fragments of anti-dinitrophenyl antibody. Biochem. J. 1976, 159:323-333.
29. Grandbois M., Beyer M., Rief M., Clausen-Schaumann H., Gaub H.E. How strong is a covalent bond?. Science 1999, 283:1727-1730.
30. Lee C.K., Wang Y.M., Huang L.S., Lin S. Atomic force microscopy: determination of unbinding force, off rate and energy barrier for protein-ligand interaction. Micron 2007, 38:446-461.
31. Wong J.Y., Kuhl T.L., Israelachvili J.N., Mullah N., Zalipsky S. Direct measurement of a tethered ligand-receptor interaction potential. Science 1997, 275:820-822.
32. Huang Y.F., Shangguan D., Liu H., Phillips J.A., Zhang X., Chen Y., Tan W. Molecular assembly of an aptamer-drug conjugate for targeted drug delivery to tumor cells. Chem. Bio. Chem. 2009, 10:862-868.
33. Lanza G.M., Wickline S.A. Targeted ultrasonic contrast agents for molecular imaging and therapy. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2003, 28:625-653.
34. Harasym T.O., Bally M.B., Tardi P. Clearance properties of liposomes involving conjugated proteins for targeting. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 1998, 32:99-118.
35. C. Lin, J. Dahlgren, S. Morris, R. Thompson, Method of producing electrostatically charged gelatin, U.S. Patent 6863783 (2005).