A multi-theory approach towards the adoption, use and effects of IT services: The case channel choice in an e-government setting

IEEE International Professional Communication Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 87-92

  Van De Wijngaert, Lidwien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE APPROACH; E-GOVERNMENT; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; IT SERVICES; NEW TECHNOLOGIES;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 77956435232     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IPCC.2010.5529818     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
2. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation. New York: The Free Press.
3. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
4. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
6. Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo Vadis TAM? Journal of the AIS, 8(3), 211-218.
7. Straub, D. W., & Burton-Jones, A. (2007). Veni, Vidi, Vici: Breaking the TAM Logjam Journal of the AIS, 8(4), 223-229.
8. Schepers, J., & Wetzels, M. (2007). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderating effects. Information & Management, 44, 90-103.
9. Mao, E., Srite, M., Thatcher, J., & Yaprak, O. (2005). A Research Model for Mobile Phone Service Behaviors: Empirical Validation in the U.S. and Turkey. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 8(4), 7-28.
10. Kleijnen, M., De Ruyter, K., & Wetzels, M. (2004). Consumer adoption of wireless services: discovering the rules while playing the game. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(2), 51-61.
11. Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.
12. Van der Heijden, P. (2003). User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 695-704.
13. Cyr, D., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2006). Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Information & Management 43, 950-963.
14. Lu, J., Yu, C.-S., Liu, C., & Yao, J. (2003). Technology Acceptance model for wireless Internet. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 13(3), 206-222.
15. Amberg, M., Hirschmeier, M., & Wehrmann, J. (2004). The Compass Acceptance Model for the analysis and evaluation of mobile servcies. International Journal Mobile Communications, 2(3), 248-259.
16. Monge, P. & Contractor, N. (2003).
17. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121-147.
18. Poole, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the Use of Group Decision Support Systems: the Theory of Adaptive Structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organisations and Communication Technology. (pp. 173-193). Newbury Park: Sage.
19. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1984). Information Richness: a New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organizational Design. In L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 6, pp. 191-133). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
20. Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
21. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
22. Dishawa, M. T., & Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9-21.
23. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. (1990). A Social Influence Model of Technology Use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and Communication Technology (pp. 117-142). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. (1991). Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail: a Test of the Social Influence Model of Technology Use. Communication Research, 18(4), 487-523.
25. Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. (1997). Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 153-170.
26. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computermediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.
27. Bijker, W. E. (1997). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
28. Lievrouw, L., & Livingstone, S. (2002). Introduction, The Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The Handbook of New Media (pp. 1-15). London: Sage.
29. Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996). The social shaping of technology. Research policy, 25(6), 865-899.
30. Frissen, V. (2000). ICTs in the Rush Hours of Life. Information Society, 16(1), 65-75.
31. Mante-Meijer, E., & Haddon, L. (2001). Checking it out with the people. ICT markets and users in Europe. Heidelberg: Eurescomo. Document Number)
32. McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999a). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part I: cross-disciplinary conceptualizations of access. Information processing and management, 35(1), 45-76.
33. McCreadie, M., & Rice, R. E. (1999b). Trends in analyzing access to information. Part II. Unique and integrating conceptualizations. Information processing and management. 35(1), 77-99.
34. Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the Domestication of Information and Communication Technologies: Technical Change and Everyday Life. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by Design. The Politics of Information and Communication Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Markus, L. (1990). Towards a "Critical Mass" Theory of Interactive media. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and Communication technology (pp. 94-118). New York: Sage.
36. Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of the Group. New York: Schocken Books.
37. Heres, J., Mante-Meijer, E., Turk, T., & Pierson, J. (2005). Adoption of ICTs: a proposed framework. In E. Mante-Meijer & L. Klamer (Eds.), Capabilities in Action: What People Do. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the Europen Communities.
38. Blechar, J., Knutsen, L., & Damsgaard, J. (2005). Reflexivity, the Social Actor and M-Service Domestication: Linking the human, technological and contextual. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Designing Ubiquitous Information Environments: Socio-Technical Issues and Challenges, Cleveland, Ohio.
39. Rossi, P. H., & Nock, L. (Eds.), (1982). Measuring Social Judgments. Beverly Hills: Sage.