ICTs in the rush hour oflife

Information Society

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 65-75

  Frissen, Valerie A J ^a  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Use of Icts

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034339993     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: 10876537     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/019722400128338     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baudrillard, J. 1988. Selected writings. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2. Bergman, S. 1997. Communication technologies in the household: The gendering of artefacts and practices. In The shaping of gender and ICTs in everyday life. Mutual shaping processes. Proceedings from COST A4/GRANITE-workshop in Amsterdam, ed. V. Frissen, pp. 137-153. Brussels: EC/COST.
3. Bergman, S., Frissen, V., and Slaa, P. 1995. Gebruikenbetekenis van de telefoon in het leven van alledag. In Toeval ofNoodzaak ? Geschiede-nis van de overheidsbemoeienis met de informatievoorziening, ed. Rathenau Instituut, pp. 277-325. Amsterdam: Cramwinckel.
4. Bijker, W., and Law, J. 1992. Shaping technology/Building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Dudley, K., Steinfleld, C., Kraut, R., and Katz, J. 1993. Rethinking household telecommunications. Paper presented to the International Communication Association Conference, Washington, DC, May.
6. Elchardus, M. 1996. De gemobiliseerde samenleving. Tussen de oude en de nieuwe ordening van de tijd. Brussels: Koning Boudewijn Stichting.
7. Frissen, V., ed. 1997. The shaping of gender and ICTs in everyday life. Mutual shaping processes. Proceedings from COST A4/GRANITE Workshop in Amsterdam. Brussels: EC/COST.
8. Frissen, V., and Punie, Y. 1998. Never mind the gap. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods in ICT-user research: The case of busy households. In EMTEL working paper no. 5. Methodologies for media and information technology research in everyday life, eds. R. Silverstone and M. Hartmann, pp. 73-94. Brighton: University of Sussex.
9. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
10. Heap, N., Thomas, R., Einon, G., and MacKay, H., eds. 1995. Information technology and society: A reader. London/Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Hermes, J. 1995. Reading women's magazines. An analysis of everyday media use. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. Moores, S. 1993. Interpreting audiences. The ethnography of media consumption. London: Sage.
13. MacKenzie, D., and Wacjman, J. 1985. The social shaping of technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
14. Moyal, A. 1992. The gendered use of the telephone: An Australian case study. Media, Culture &Society 14:51-72.
15. Punie, Y. 1997. Rejections of ICTs in Flemish households. The why-not question. In EMTEL working paper no. 3. Media &information technology: Regulation, markets &everyday life, eds. R. Silverstone and M. Hartmann, pp. 46-72. Brighton: University of Sussex.
16. Silverstone, R., and Hirsch, E., eds. 1992. Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge.
17. Silverstone, R., and Haddon, L. 1996. Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In Communication by design. The politics of information and communication technologies, eds. R. Mansell and R. Silverstone, pp. 44-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. 1996. Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 1996. Rijswijk: SCP
19. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. 1998. Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 1998. Rijswijk: SCP.
20. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. 1990. Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21. Wetherell, M., and Potter, J. 1988. Discourse analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods, ed. C. Anataki, pp. 168-183. London/Newbury Park, CA: Sage.