Prioritized spatial updating in the intrinsic frame of reference

Spatial Cognition and Computation

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 89-113

  Wang, Hongbin ^a   Sun, Yanlong ^b   Johnson, Todd R ^a   Yuan, Ye ^a  

^a University of Texas School of Health Information Sciences at Houston   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Frame of reference; Salience effect; Spatial cognition; Spatial representations; Spatial updating

Indexed keywords

FRAME OF REFERENCE; SALIENCE EFFECT; SPATIAL COGNITION; SPATIAL REPRESENTATIONS; SPATIAL UPDATING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 77956416800     PISSN: 13875868     EISSN: 15427633     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15427633scc0501_4     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Alyan, S., & McNaughton, B. L. (1999). Hippocampectomized rats are capable of homing by path integration. Behavioral Neurosciences, 113, 19-31.
2. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., & Irwin, D. E. (1994). Reference frame activation during spatial term assignment. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 646-671.
3. Chapius, N., & Varlet, C. (1987). Short cuts by dogs in natural surroundings. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39B, 49-64.
4. Collett, T. S., & Collett, M. (2000). Path integration in insects. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 757-762.
5. Collett, M., Collett, T. S., Bisch, S., & Wehner, R. (1998). Local and global vectors in desert ant navigation. Nature, 394, 269-272.
6. Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Viewpoint dependence in scene recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 302-307.
7. Easton, R. D., & Sholl, M. J. (1995). Object-array structure, frames of reference, and retrieval of spatial knoweldge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 483-500.
8. Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
9. Evans, G. & Pezdek, K. (1980). Cognitive mapping: Knowledge of realworld distance and location information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 13-24.
10. Franklin, N., Henkel, L. A., & Zangas, T. (1995). Parsing surrounding space into regions. Memory and Cognition, 23, 397-407.
11. Garnham, A. (1989). A unified theory of the meaning of some spatial relational terms, Cognition, 31, 45-60.
12. Golledge, R. G. (Ed.). (1999). Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Gottlieb, J. P., Kusunoki, M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1998). The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex. Nature, 391, 481-484.
14. Hintzman, D. L., O'Dell, C. S., & Arndt, D. R. (1981). Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 149-206.
15. Holyoak, K. J. & Mah, W. A. (1982). Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 328-352.
16. Hunt, E., & Waller, D. (1999). Orientation and wayfinding: A review (Technical Report to ONR). Arlington, VA.
17. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews, 2, 194-203.
18. Kahneman, D., Treisman, A., & Gibbs, B. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 175-219.
19. Klatzky, R. L. (1998). Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, and K. F. Wender (Eds.) Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (pp. 1-17). New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Klatzky, R. L., Beall, A. C., Loomis, J. M., Golledge, R. G., & Philbeck, J. W. (1999). Human navigation ability: Tests of the encoding-error model of path integration. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 31-65.
21. Klatzky, R. L., Loomis, J. M., Beall, A. C., Chance, S. S., & Golledge, R. G. (1998). Spatial updating of self-position and orientation during real, imagined, and virtual locomotion. Psychological Science, 9, 293-298.
22. Levine, M., Janovic, I., & Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 157-175.
23. Levinson, S. C. (1996). Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention: An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603-649.
25. May, M., & Klatzky, R. L. (2000). Path integration while ignoring irrelevant movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 169-186.
26. McNamara, T. P. (2003). How are the locations of objects in the environment represented in memory? In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, and K. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial reasoning (pp. 174-191). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
27. McNamara, T. P., & Diwadkar, V. A. (1997). Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 160-190.
28. Mou, W., & McNamara, T. P. (2002). Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Journal Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 162-170.
29. O'Keefe, J., & Speakman, A. (1987). Single unit activity in the rat hippocampus during a spatial memory task. Experimental Brain Research, 68, 1-27.
30. Presson, C. C., & Montello, D. R. (1994). Updating after rotational and translational body movements: Coordinate structure of perspective space. Perception, 23, 1477-1455.
31. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2000). Situating vision in the world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 197-207.
32. Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80, 127-158.
33. Rieser, J. J. (1989). Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 15, 1157-1165.
34. Sadalla, E. K., Burroughs, W. J., & Staplin, L. J. (1980). Reference points in spatial cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 516-528.
35. Shelton, A. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1997). Multiple views of spatial memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 102-106.
36. Scholl, B. J., Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Feldman, J. (2001). What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking. Cognition, 80, 159-177.
37. Sholl, M. J. (1987). Cognitive maps as orienting schema. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 615-625.
38. Sholl, M. J., & Bartels, G. P. (2002). The role of self-to-object updating in orientation-free performance on spatial-memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 422-436.
39. Sholl, M. J., & Nolin, T. L. (1997). Orientation specificity in representations of place. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1494-1507.
40. Simons, D. J., & Wang, R. F. (1998). Perceiving real-world viewpoint changes. Psychological Science, 9, 315-320.
41. Thinus-Blanc, C. (1996). Animal spatial cognition: Behavioral and brain approach. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
42. Tversky, B. (2000). Remembering spaces. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp.363-378). New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Waller, D., Montellob, D. R., Richardson, A. E., & Hegartya, M. (2002). Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1051-1063.
44. Wang, H., Johnson, T. R., Sun, Y., & Zhang, J. (in press). Object-location memory: The interplay of multiple representations. Memory and Cognition.
45. Wang, H., Johnson, T. R., & Zhang, J. (2001). The mind's views of space. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of Cognitive Science, Beijing, China.
46. Wang, R. F. (1999). Representing a stable environment by egocentric updating and invariant representations. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 1, 431-445.
47. Wang, R. F., & Simons, D. J. (1999). Active and passive scene recognition across views. Cognition, 70, 191-210.
48. Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000). Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition, 77, 215-250.
49. Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2002). Huamn spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 376-382.
50. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 1, 202-238.
51. Wolfe, J. M. (2003). Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 70-76.
52. Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 151-168.
53. Wraga, M., Creem, S. H., & Proffitt, D. R. (2004). Spatial updating of virtual displays during self-and display rotation. Memory and Cognition, 32, 399-415.