Comparing the validity of five participation instruments in persons with spinal conditions

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 724-734

  Noonan, Vanessa K ^a   Kopec, Jacek A ^a,b   Noreau, Luc ^c,d   Singer, Joel ^a   Mâsse, Louise C ^a   Zhang, Hongbin ^a   Dvorak, Marcel F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b ARTHRITIS RESEARCH CENTRE OF CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d CENTER FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN REHABILITATION AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CONCEPT; SPINAL CORD INJURY; SPINE DISEASE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CONCEPT; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; SPINAL DISEASES;

EID: 77956414000     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0584     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cicerone KD. Participation as an outcome of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 494-501.
2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
3. Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, Singer J, Dvorak MF. A review of participation instruments based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Disabil Rehabil 2009; 31: 1883-1901.
4. Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002; 11: 193-205.
5. Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons' responses and performance as scientific inquiry into score meaning. Am Psychol 1995; 50: 741-749.
6. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life: assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 2000.
7. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patientbased outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 1998; 2: 1-74.
8. Cardol M, de Haan RJ, de Jong BA, van den Bos GA, de Groot IJ. Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 210-216.
9. Wilkie R, Peat G, Thomas E, Hooper H, Croft PR. The Keele Assessment of Participation: a new instrument to measure participation restriction in population studies. Combined qualitative and quantitative examination of its psychometric properties. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1889-1899.
10. Gandek B, Sinclair SJ, Jette AM, Ware JE Jr. Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the participation measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 86: 57-71.
11. Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, Participation subjective: a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2004; 19: 459-481.
12. World Health Organization. Geneva: WHODAS II; [updated 2001, November 27; cited 2006 March 10]. Available from: http://www. who.int/icidh/whodas.
13. Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Donovan WH, Graves DE, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2003; 26 Suppl 1: S50-S56.
14. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossei AH, Katz JN. The SelfAdministered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 156-163.
15. Statistics Canada. 2006 Census Dictionary. Statistics Canada Catalogue no 92-566-XWE 2007 [cited 2008 Feb 16]. Available from: http://wwwl2.statcan.ca/ english/census06/reference/dictionary/index.cfm.
16. Vernon H.MiorS.TheNeck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1991; 14: 409-415.
17. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 2000; 25: 2940-2952.
18. Hoenig H, Mclntyre L, Sloane R, Branch LG, Truncali A, Horner RD. The reliability of a self-reported measure of disease, impairment, and function in persons with spinal cord dysfunction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 378-387.
19. Hoenig H, Branch LG, Mclntyre L, Hoff J, Horner RD. The validity in persons with spinal cord injury of a self-reported functional measure derived from the functional independence measure. Spine 1999;24: 539-543.
20. Fugl-Meyer AR, Melin R, Fugl-Meyer KS. Life satisfaction in 18- to 64-year-old Swedes: in relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 239-246.
21. Joreskog KG. Testing structural equation models: Ih: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc.; 1993, p. 294-316.
22. Muthen B, Kaplan D. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1984; 38: 171-189.
23. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc.; 1993, p. 136-162.
24. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cuttoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6: 1-55.
25. Feinstein AR. Clinimetric perspectives. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 635-640.
26. McHomey CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item ShortForm Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993; 31: 247-263.
27. Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 34-42.
28. Noonan VK, Kopec JA, Noreau L, Singer J, Mâsse LC, Dvorak MF. Comparing the reliability of five participation instruments in persons with spinal conditions: J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 730-738.
29. Sibley A, Kersten P, Ward CD, White B, Mehta R, George S. Measuring autonomy in disabled people: validation of a new scale in a UK population. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 793-803.
30. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guildford Press; 2006.
31. Anderson KD, Borisoff JF, Johnson RD, Stiens SA, Elliott SL. The impact of spinal cord injury on sexual function: concerns of the general population. Spinal Cord 2007; 45: 328-337.
32. Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: S22-S35.
33. Rochette A, Korner-Bitensky N, Levasseur M. 'Optimal' participation: a reflective look. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 1231-1235.
34. Cantor JB, Ashman T, Gordon W, Ginsberg A, Engmann C, Egan M, et al. Fatigue after traumatic brain injury and its impact on participation and quality of life. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2008; 23:41-51.
35. Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Quality of Life Index: development and psychometric properties. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1985; 8: 15-24.