Quantitative phosphoproteomics: New technologies and applications in the DNA damage response

Cell Cycle

Volumn 9, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 3479-3484

  Zhou, Huilin ^a,b   Albuquerque, Claudio P ^a   Liang, Jason ^a   Suhandynata, Raymond T ^a   Weng, Stephanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA damage response; HILIC; Mass spectrometry; Phosphorylation; Proteomics; SILAC

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; DNA DAMAGE; HUMAN; ISOTOPE LABELING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NEOPLASM; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 77956411032     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.9.17.13152     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Pawson T. Specificity in signal transduction: from phosphotyrosine-SH2 domain interactions to complex cellular systems. Cell 2004; 116:191-203. (Pubitemid 38167312)
2. Pawson T, Kofler M. Kinome signaling through regulated protein-protein interactions in normal and cancer cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2009; 21:147-53.
3. Hunter T. Protein kinases and phosphatases: the yin and yang of protein phosphorylation and signaling. Cell 1995; 80:225-36.
4. Smolka MB, Albuquerque CP, Chen SH, Zhou H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:10364-9. (Pubitemid 47185671)
5. Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 2003; 422:198-207.
6. Yates JR, 3rd, Eng JK, McCormack AL, Schieltz D. Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modified peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. Anal Chem 1995; 67:1426-36.
7. Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR, 3rd. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19:242-7.
8. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H, Zhong G, Guo X, Ignatchenko A, et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2006; 440:637-43.
9. Aebersold R, Rist B, Gygi SP. Quantitative proteome analysis: methods and applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 919:33-47.
10. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat Biotechnol 1999; 17:994-9. (Pubitemid 29474856)
11. Smolka M, Albuquerque SP, Chen SH, Schmidt KH, Wei XX, Kolodner RD, Zhou H. Dynamic Changes in Protein-protein Interaction and Protein Phosphorylation Probed with Amine Reactive Isotope Tag. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 2005; 4:1358-69. (Pubitemid 41448722)
12. Bantscheff M, Boesche M, Eberhard D, Matthieson T, Sweetman G, Kuster B. Robust and sensitive iTRAQ quantification on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008; 7:1702-13.
13. Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, Kristensen DB, Steen H, Pandey A, et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002; 1:376-86.
14. Wu CC, MacCoss MJ, Howell KE, Matthews DE, Yates JR, 3rd. Metabolic labeling of mammalian organisms with stable isotopes for quantitative proteomic analysis. Anal Chem 2004; 76:4951-9.
15. Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A, McDonald ER, 3rd, Hurov KE, Luo J, et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 2007; 316:1160-6. (Pubitemid 46877472)
16. Mann M. Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:952-8. (Pubitemid 44871421)
17. Holt LJ, Tuch BB, Villen J, Johnson AD, Gygi SP, Morgan DO. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 2009; 325:1682-6.
18. Kruger M, Moser M, Ussar S, Thievessen I, Luber CA, Forner F, et al. SILAC mouse for quantitative proteomics uncovers kindlin-3 as an essential factor for red blood cell function. Cell 2008; 134:353-64. (Pubitemid 352010327)
19. Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE, Thoreen CC, Cheng D, Marsischky G, et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21:921-6. (Pubitemid 36936199)
20. Choudhary C, Kumar C, Gnad F, Nielsen ML, Rehman M, Walther TC, et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 2009; 325:834-40.
21. Zhou W, Ryan JJ, Zhou H. Global analyses of sumoylated proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Induction of protein sumoylation by cellular stresses. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:32262-8.
22. Ong SE, Mittler G, Mann M. Identifying and quantifying in vivo methylation sites by heavy methyl SILAC. Nat Methods 2004; 1:119-26.
23. Hardman M, Makarov AA. Interfacing the orbitrap mass analyzer to an electrospray ion source. Anal Chem 2003; 75:1699-705. (Pubitemid 36512611)
24. Makarov A, Denisov E, Kholomeev A, Balschun W, Lange O, Strupat K, et al. Performance evaluation of a hybrid linear ion trap/orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal Chem 2006; 78:2113-20.
25. Ficarro S, Chertihin O, Westbrook VA, White F, Jayes F, Kalab P, et al. Phosphoproteome analysis of capacitated human sperm. Evidence of tyrosine phosphorylation of a kinase-anchoring protein 3 and valosin-containing protein/p97 during capacitation. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:11579-89. (Pubitemid 36792720)
26. Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D, Elias JE, Villen J, Li J, et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:12130-5. (Pubitemid 39145408)
27. Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F, Macek B, Kumar C, Mortensen P, et al. Global, in vivo and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006; 127:635-48. (Pubitemid 44647421)
28. Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Mueller M, Domon B, Aebersold R. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat Methods 2007; 4:231-7. (Pubitemid 46358873)
29. Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S, Mortensen P, Faergeman NJ, Mann M, et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005; 4:310-27. (Pubitemid 40439774)
30. Albuquerque CP, Smolka MB, Payne SH, Bafna V, Eng J, Zhou H. A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008; 7:1389-96. (Pubitemid 352038280)
31. McNulty DE, Annan RS. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography reduces the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global phosphopeptide isolation and detection. Mol Cell Proteomics 2008; 7:971-80.
32. Chen SH, Albuquerque CP, Liang J, Suhandynata RT, Zhou H. A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:12803-12.
33. Beausoleil SA, Villen J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat Biotechnol 2006; 24:1285-92. (Pubitemid 44564776)
34. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999; 20:3551-67.
35. Park SK, Venable JD, Xu T, Yates JR, 3rd. A quantitative analysis software tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods 2008; 5:319-22.
36. Han DK, Eng J, Zhou H, Aebersold R. Quantitative profiling of differentiation-induced microsomal proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19:946-51. (Pubitemid 32947573)
37. Cox J, Matic I, Hilger M, Nagaraj N, Selbach M, Olsen JV, et al. A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat Protoc 2009; 4:698-705.
38. Bakalarski CE, Elias JE, Villen J, Haas W, Gerber SA, Everley PA, et al. The impact of peptide abundance and dynamic range on stable-isotope-based quantitative proteomic analyses. J Proteome Res 2008; 7:4756-65.
39. Zhou H, Watts JD, Aebersold R. A systematic approach to the analysis of protein phosphorylation. Nat Biotechnol 2001; 19:375-8. (Pubitemid 32275349)
40. Chi A, Huttenhower C, Geer LY, Coon JJ, Syka JE, Bai DL, et al. Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:2193-8.
41. Tanner S, Shu H, Frank A, Wang LC, Zandi E, Mumby M, et al. InsPecT: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem 2005; 77:4626-39. (Pubitemid 41542287)
42. Payne SH, Yau M, Smolka MB, Tanner S, Zhou H, Bafna V. Phosphorylation-specific MS/MS scoring for rapid and accurate phosphoproteome analysis. J Proteome Res 2008; 7:3373-81.
43. Chen SH, Albuquerque CP, Liang J, Suhandynata RT, Zhou H. A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J Biol Chem 285:12803-12.
44. Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A, Kumar C, Miller ML, Jensen LJ, et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci Signal 3:3.
45. Harrison JC, Haber JE. Surviving the breakup: the DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 2006; 40:209-35.
46. Nyberg KA, Michelson RJ, Putnam CW, Weinert TA. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu Rev Genet 2002; 36:617-56.
47. Kolodner RD, Putnam CD, Myung K. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2002; 297:552-7.
48. Savitsky K, Bar-Shira A, Gilad S, Rotman G, Ziv Y, Vanagaite L, et al. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science 1995; 268:1749-53.
49. Kim ST, Lim DS, Canman CE, Kastan MB. Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:37538-43.
50. Chen SH, Smolka MB, Zhou H. Mechanism of Dun1 activation by Rad53 phosphorylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:986-95.
51. Chen SH, Zhou H. Reconstitution of Rad53 activation by Mec1 through adaptor protein Mrc1. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:18593-604.
52. Lee SJ, Schwartz MF, Duong JK, Stern DF. Rad53 phosphorylation site clusters are important for Rad53 regulation and signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:6300-14.