Surface responses and desirability functions to determine optimal granulation domains

Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1016-1026

  Giry, K ^a,b   Viana, M ^a   Genty, M ^b   Wthrich, P ^b   Chulia, D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMOGES   (France)

^b INSTITUT DE RECHERCHES INTERNATIONALES SERVIER   (France)

Author keywords

Desirability function; Doehlert experimental design; High shear wet granulation; Multiphase process; Response surfaces; Single pot process

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DRUG GRANULATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; TABLET SURFACE;

DESICCATION; DOSAGE FORMS; DRUG COMPOUNDING; EXCIPIENTS; PARTICLE SIZE; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; POROSITY; SOLUBILITY; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TABLETS; TECHNOLOGY, PHARMACEUTICAL;

EID: 77956395858     PISSN: 03639045     EISSN: 15205762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03639041003598978     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Gaillard C, Chulia D, Jeannin C, Ozil P, Paschos S. (1989). Granulation à laide dun granulateur-séchoir à grande vitesse. Pharm Acta Helv, 64:168-76.
2. André F, Bouiller B, Adams S, Bagnaro M, Becourt P, Guyot JC. (1990). Etude par plan dexpériences de linfluence de trois paramètres de fabrication sur la qualité de grains obtenus en Turbosphère. STP Pharma Sci, 6:723-7.
3. Robin P, Lusicano LJ, Pearlswig DM. (1994). Rational for selection of a single-pot manufacturing process using microwave/ vacuum drying. Pharm Technol, 5:28-36.
4. Stahl H. (2000). Single-pot system for drying pharmaceutical granules. Pharm Technol Eur, 12:192-201.
5. Giry K, Genty M, Viana M, Wüthrich P, Chulia D. (2006). Multiphase versus single pot granulation process: Influence of process and granulation parameters on granule properties. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 32:509-30.
6. Giry K, Viana M, Genty M, Louvet F, Wüthrich P, Chulia D. (2009). Comparison of single pot and multiphase equipment. Part 1: Effect of the high shear granulator on granule properties according to the drug substance and its concentration. Pharm Dev Technol, 14(2):138-48.
7. Hegedüs A, Pintye-Hódi K. (2007). Influence of the type of the high-shear granulator on the physico-chemical properties of granules. Chem Eng Process, 46:1012-9.
8. Giry K, Viana M, Genty M, Louvet F, Wüthrich P, Chulia D. (2009). Comparison of single pot and multiphase equipment. Part 2: Effect of the drying process on granules manufactured in a single pot granulator and dried either in situ or in a fluid bed dryer. Pharm Dev Technol, 14(2):149-58.
9. Hegedüs A, Pintye-Hódi K. (2007). Comparison of the effects of different drying techniques on properties of granules and tablets made on a production scale. Int J Pharm, 330:99-104.
10. Vojnovic D, Moneghini M, Rubessa F, Zanchetta A. (1993). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables in a granulation process. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 19:1479-96.
11. Wehrle P, Nobelis Ph, Cuine A, Stamm A. (1993). Response surface methodology: An interesting statistical tool for process optimization and validation: Example of wet granulation in a high-shear mixer. Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 19:1637-53.
12. Lipps DM, Sakr AM. (1994). Characterization of wet granulation process parameters using response surface methodology. Top-spray fluidized bed. J Pharm Sci, 83:937-47.
13. Ogawa O, Kamijima T, Miyamoto Y, Miyajima M, Sato M, Takayama K, et al. (1994). A new attempt to solve the scale-up problem for granulation using response surface methodology. J Pharm Sci, 83:439-43.
14. Vojnovic D, Chicco D, El Zenary H. (1996). Doehlert experimental design applied to optimization and quality control of a granulation process in a high shear mixer. Int J Pharm, 145:203-13.
15. Schwartz JB, OConnor RE. (1997). Optimization techniques in pharmaceutical formulation and processing. In: Banker GS, Rhodes CT, eds. Modern pharmaceutics. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 727-52.
16. Soyeux P, Delacourte A, Delie B, Lefevre P, Boniface B. (1998). Influence and optimisation of operating parameters with a new binder in wet granulation. I: Use in powder form. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 46:95-103.
17. Campisi B, Vojnovic D, Chicco D, Phan-Tan-Luu R. (1999). Melt granulation in a high shear mixer: Optimization of mixture and process variables using a combined experimental design. Chemom Intell Lab Syst, 48:59-70. (Pubitemid 29304080)
18. Voinovich D, Moneghini M, Perissutti B, Franceschinis E. (2001). Melt pelletization in high shear mixer using a hydrophobic melt binder: Influence of some apparatus and process variables. Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 52:305-13.
19. Devay A, Mayer K, Pal S, Antal IJ. (2006). Investigation on drug dissolution and particle characteristics of pellets related to manufacturing process variables of high shear granulation. J Biochem Biophys Methods, 69:197-205.
20. Harrington J. (1965). The desirability function. Ind Qual Control, 21:494-8.
21. Derringer R, Suich R. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol, 12:214-9.
22. Paterakis PC, Korakianiti PP, Dallas PP, Rekkas DM. (2002). Evaluation and simultaneous optimization of some pellets characteristics using a 33 factorial design and the desirability function. Int J Pharm, 248:51-60.
23. Ribardo C, Allen TT. (2003). An alternative desirability function for achieving six sigma quality. Qual Reliab Eng Int, 19:227-40.
24. Réthy Z, Koczor Z, Erdélyi J. (2004). Handling contradictory requirement using desirability functions. Acta Polytech Hung, 1:5-12.
25. International Conference on Harmonisation. (2006). Guidance for industry: Q8 Pharmaceutical Development, U.S. department of health and human services FDA, center for drug evaluation and research (CDER), center for biologics evaluation and research (CBER).
26. Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Weller PJ. (2003). Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. 4th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press.
27. Kumar V, Reus-Medina ML, Yang D. (2002). Preparation, characterisation and tableting properties of a new cellulose-based pharmaceutical aid. Int J Pharm, 235(2):129-40.
28. Carr RL. (1965). Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng, 18:163-8.
29. Fell JT, Newton JM. (1970). Determination of tablets strength by the diametral-compression test. J Pharm Sci, 59(5):688-91.
30. Cunningham JC, Sinka IC, Zavaliangos A. (2004). Analysis of tablet compaction. I. Characterization of mechanical behaviour of powder and powder/tooling friction. J Pharm Sci, 93(8):2022-39.
31. Ribet J (2003). Fonctionnalisation des excipients: application à la comprimabilité des celluloses et des saccharoses. Ph.D. thesis, Limoges: Université de Limoges, 236 p.
32. Gibassier D, Sado P, Le Verge R, Devissaguet JPh. (1982). Test de dissolution et fonction de Weibull. Labo Pharm Probl Tech, 30(319):249-56.
33. Costa P, Sousa Lobo JM. (2001). Modelling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur J Pharm Sci, 13(2):123-33.
34. Doehlert DH. (1970). Uniform shell designs. J R Stat Soc, 19C:231-9.
35. Louvet F, Delplanque L. (2005). Les plans dexpériences: une approche pragmatique et illustrée. France: Association Expérimentique.
36. Authelin JR, Lepinasse G, Leprince-Ringuet J, Quessada V (1996). Phénomène dattrition, damorphisation et de mécanochimie accompagnant le séchage agité sous vide des produits pharmaceutiques. Ème journél de lAFSIA, 4:73-96.
37. Stahl H. (2004). Comparing different granulation techniques. Pharm Technol Eur, 11:23-33