Coercion and compositionality

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2131-2140

  Baggio, Giosuè ^a   Choma, Travis ^b   Van Lambalgen, Michiel ^c   Hagoort, Peter ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED RESPONSE; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SEMANTICS; WORKING MEMORY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COERCION; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956369916     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21303     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1996). CELEX2. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
2. Baggio, G., van Lambalgen, M., & Hagoort, P. (in press). The processing consequences of compositionality. In W. Hinzen, E. Machery, & M. Werning (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of compositionality. Oxford University Press.
3. Brennan, J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion. Brain and Language, 106, 132-143.
4. Bresson, M., Kutas, M., & van Petten, C. (1992). An event-related potential (ERP) analysis of semantic congruity and repetition effects in sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 132-149.
5. Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (2005). Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. De Long, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1117-1121.
7. Egg, M. (2003). Beginning novels and finishing hamburgers: Remarks on the semantics of "to begin." Journal of Semantics, 20, 163-191.
8. Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). Right words and left words: Electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 373-392.
9. Ferretti, T. R., Kutas, M., & McRae, K. (2007). Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 182-196.
10. Frisson, S., & McElree, B. (2008). Complement coercion is not ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1-11.
11. Hagoort, P. (2003). How the brain solves the binding problem for language: A neurocomputational model of syntactic processing. Neuroimage, 20, S18-S29.
12. Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 416-423.
13. Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R. M. (2009). Semantic unification. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. (1994). Brain responses to lexical ambiguity resolution and parsing. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 45-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Hagoort, P., Hald, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438-441. (Pubitemid 38495939)
16. Hagoort, P., & van Berkum, J. (2007). Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 362, 801-811.
17. Hald, L., Steenbeek-Planting, E., & Hagoort, P. (2007). The integration of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400. Brain Research, 1146, 210-218.
18. Halgren, E., Dhond, R. P., Christensen, N., Van Petten, C., Marinkovic, K., Lewine, J. D., et al. (2002). N400-like MEG responses modulated by semantic context, word frequency, and lexical class in sentences. Neuroimage, 17, 1101-1116. (Pubitemid 35333834)
19. Hamm, F., Kamp, H., & van Lambalgen, M. (2006). There is no opposition between formal and cognitive semantics. Theoretical Linguistics, 22, 1-40. (Pubitemid 44413239)
20. Harris, J., Pylkkänen, L., McElree, B., & Frisson, S. (2007). The cost of question concealment: Eye-tracking and MEG evidence. Brain and Language, 107, 44-61.
21. Helenius, P., Salmelin, R., Service, E., & Connolly, J. (1998). Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex. Brain, 121, 1133-1142. (Pubitemid 28256986)
22. Holcomb, P. (1993). Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: Implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. Psychophysiology, 30, 47-61.
23. Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Joshi, A., & Schabes, Y. (1997). Tree-adjoining grammars. In A. Salomma & G. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of formal languages and automata. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
25. Katz, J. J., & Fodor, J. A. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Language, 39, 170-210.
26. Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 205-225. (Pubitemid 40233696)
27. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 463-470.
28. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203-205. (Pubitemid 10141432)
29. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161-163. (Pubitemid 14132900)
30. Li, X., Hagoort, P., & Yang, Y. (2008). Event-related potential evidence on the influence of accentuation in spoken discourse comprehension in Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 906-915. (Pubitemid 351657345)
31. Maris, E. (2004). Randomization tests for ERP topographies and whole spatiotemporal data matrices. Psychophysiology, 41, 142-151.
32. Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG and MEG data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164, 177-190. (Pubitemid 46950991)
33. McElree, B., Pylkkanen, L., Pickering, M. J., & Traxler, M. J. (2006). A time course analysis of enriched composition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 53-59. (Pubitemid 44411978)
34. McElree, B., Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., Seely, R. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2001). Reading time evidence for enriched composition. Cognition, 78, 17-25.
35. Nieuwland, M. S., & van Berkum, J. J. A. (2005). When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1098-1111.
36. Özyürek, A., Willems, R. M., Kita, S., & Hagoort, P. (2007). On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 605-616. (Pubitemid 46495292)
37. Partee, B., ter Meulen, A., & Wall, R. (1990). Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
38. Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Pylkkänen, L. (2008). Mismatching meanings in brain and behavior. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2/4, 712-738.
40. Pylkkänen, L., & McElree, B. (2006). The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 537-577). New York: Elsevier.
41. Pylkkänen, L., & McElree, B. (2007). An MEG study of silent meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1905-1921.
42. Rugg, M. D. (1983). Dissociation of semantic priming, word and non-word repetition effects by event-related potentials. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 39, 123-148.
43. Simos, P. G., Basile, L. F. H., & Papanicolaou, A. C. (1997). Source localization of the N400 response in a sentence-reading paradigm using evoked magnetic fields and magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Research, 762, 29-39.
44. Traxler, M. J., McElree, B., Williams, R. S., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 1-25. (Pubitemid 40801100)
45. Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., & McElree, B. (2002). Coercion in sentence processing: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 530-547.
46. van Berkum, J., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 657-671.
47. van Berkum, J., Zwitserlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 701-718. (Pubitemid 38373375)
48. van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C., & Hagoort, P. (1999). Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 147-182.
49. van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40, 235-248. (Pubitemid 36336846)
50. van Lambalgen, M., & Hamm, F. (2004). The proper treatment of events. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
51. van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory & Cognition, 18, 380-393.
52. van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words. Memory & Cognition, 19, 95-112.
53. Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75, 105-143.