Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among language minority learners and their classmates in early adolescence

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 596-632

  Lesaux, Nonie K ^a   Kieffer, Michael J ^b  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

^b Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

language minority learners; latent class analysis; reading comprehension difficulties; vocabulary

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956361361     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0002831209355469     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Aarts, R., & Verhoeven, L. (1999). Literacy attainment in a second language submersion context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 377-393.
2. Achieve. (2005). Rising to the challenge: Are high school graduates prepared for college and work? Washington, DC: Author.
3. Act. (2005). Crisis at the core: Preparing all students for college and work. Iowa City: Author. Retrieved September 21, 2009, fromhttp://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/crisis_report.pdf.
4. Alexander, P.A. (1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 33-51.
5. Alexander, P.A., & Jetton, T.L. (2000). Learning fromtext: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285-310). New York: Longman.
6. Alexander, P.A., & Judy, J.E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 375-404.
7. Allington, R.L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (1989). School response to reading failure: Instruction for Chapter 1 and special education students in grades 2, 4, & 8. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 529-542.
8. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
9. August, D.L., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. August, D.L., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Batalova, J., Fix, M., & Murray, J. (2007). Measures of change: The demography and literacy of adolescent English learners-A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
12. Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1994). In other words: The science and psychology of second language acquisition. New York: HarperCollins.
13. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C.E. (2004). Reading next-A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved December 3, 2007, fromhttp://www.carnegie.org/literacy/pdf/ReadingNext.pdf.
14. Buly, M.R., & Valencia, S.W. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3), 219-239.
15. Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 489-503.
16. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2000). Investigating the causes of reading comprehension failure: The comprehension-age match design. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 31-40.
17. Capps, R., Fix, M.E., Murray, J., Ost, J., Passell, J.S., & Hernandez, S.H. (2005). The new demography of America's schools: Immigration and the No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved November 2, 2008, fromhttp://www.urban-org/url.cfn?ID=311230.
18. Carlisle, J.F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169-190.
19. Carlisle, J.F., & Beeman, M.M. (2000). The effects of language of instruction on the reading and writing achievement of first-grade Hispanic children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 331-353.
20. Carlo, M.S., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C.E., Dressler, C., Lippman, D.N.,et al.(2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English-language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 188-215.
21. Catts, H.W., Hogan, T.P., & Adlof, S.M. (2005). Developing changes in reading and reading disabilities. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kahmi (Eds.), The connections between language and reading disabilities (pp. 50-71). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Chatterji, M. (2006). Reading achievement gaps, correlates, and moderators of early reading achievement: Evidence fromthe Early Childhood Longitudinal Study kindergarten to first grade sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 489-507.
23. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
24. Cosentino de Cohen, C., Deterding, N., & Clewell, B.C. (2005). Who's left behind? Immigrant children in high and low LEP schools. Policy Report produced by the Urban Institute. Retrieved November 22, 2008, fromhttp://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411231_whos_left_behind.pdf.
25. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 213-238.
26. Crawford, J. (2004). Educating English learners: Language diversity in the classroom (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Bilingual Education Services.
27. De George, G. (1988). Assessment and placement of language minority students: Procedures for mainstreaming. Equity and Excellence, 23, 44-56.
28. de Jong, E.J. (2004). After exit: Academic achievement patterns of former English language learners. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 12. Retrieved September 22, 2005, fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n50/v12n50.pdf.
29. Deshler, D., Palincsar, A., Biancarosa, G., & Nair, M. (2007). Informed choices for struggling adolescent readers: A research-based guide to instructional programs and practices. New York: International Reading Association.
30. Dressman, M. (2007). Theoretically framed: Argument and desire in the production of general knowledge about literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 332-363.
31. Dressman, M., Wilder, P., & Connor, J.J. (2005). Theories of failure and the failure of theories: A cognitive/sociocultural/macrostructural study of eight struggling students. Research in the Teaching of English, 40, 8-61.
32. Droop, M., & Verhoeven, L. (1998). Background knowledge, linguistic complexity, and second-language reading comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 30, 253-271.
33. Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
34. Durkin, D. (1978/1979). What classrooms observations reveal about comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481-533.
35. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Feldman, D.H. (1994). Beyond universals in cognitive development (2nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. Fischer, K.W., & Pare-Blagoev, J. (2000). From individual differences to dynamic pathways of development. Child Development, 71, 850-853.
38. Fleischman, H.L. & Hopstock, P.J. (1993). Descriptive study of services to limited English proficient students: Vol. 1. Summary of findings and conclusions. Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
39. Fletcher, J., Morris, J., Lyon, G.R., Stuebing, K.K. Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D.P.,et al.(1997). Subtypes of dyslexia: An old problem revisited. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 95-114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Fukkink, R.G., & de Glopper, K. (1998). Effects of instruction in deriving word meaning fromcontext: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 68, 450-469.
41. Gandara, P., & Rumberger, R. (2002). The inequitable treatment of English learners in California's public schools. UCLA's Institute for Democracy, Education, & Access. Williams Watch Series: Investigating the Claims of Williams v. State of California (Paper No. wws-rr005-1002). Available: http://repositories.cdlib.org/idea/wws/wws-rr005-1002.
42. Gandara, P., Rumberger, R.W., Maxwell-Jolly, J., & Callahan, R. (2003). English learners in California schools: Unequal resources, unequal outcomes. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11. Retrieved September 21, 2009, fromhttp://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n36/.
43. Gathercole, S.E., & Alloway, T.P. (2008). Working memory and learning: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
45. Gottardo, A., Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1996). The relationships between phonological sensitivity, syntactic processing, and verbal working memory in the reading performance of third-grade children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 563-582.
46. Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10.
47. Graves, M.F. (2000). A vocabulary program to complement and bolster a middle-grade comprehension program. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. Van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 116-135). New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Graves, M.F. (2006). The vocabulary book. New York: Teachers College Press.
49. Hacquebord, H. (1994). L2 reading in the content areas: Textbook comprehension in secondary education in the Netherlands. Journal of Research in Reading, 17, 83-98.
50. Hausken, G., Brimhall, D., & Pollack, J. (2001, April). Kindergartners' educational progress in reading: A study of language minority and non-language minority children. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
51. Hoover, W.A., & Gough, P.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127-160.
52. Hock, M.F., Brasseur, I.F., Deshler, D.D., Catts, H.W., Marquis, J.G., Mark, C.A.,et al.(2009). What is the nature of struggling adolescent readers in urban schools? Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 32, 21-38.
53. Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 172-192.
54. Kamil, M. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved September 21, 2009, fromhttp://www.all4ed.org/files/archive/publications/AdolescentsAndLiter acy.pdf.
55. Katzir, T., Kim, Y.S., Wolf, M., Morris, R., & Lovett, M.W. (2007). The varieties of pathways to dysfluent reading: Comparing subtypes of children with dyslexia at letter, word, and connected text levels of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 47-66.
56. Kieffer, M.J. (2008). Catching up or falling behind? Initial English proficiency, concentrated poverty, and the reading growth of language minority learners in the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 851-868.
57. Kieffer, M.J., & Lesaux, N.K. (2008). The role of morphology in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking English language learners. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 783-804.
58. Kieffer, M.J., & Lesaux, N.K. (2009). Dimensions of vocabulary knowledge for sixth graders fromlinguistically diverse backgrounds: Academic language, breadth, contextual sensitivity, and morphological awareness. Manuscript submitted for publication.
59. Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory and learning. American Psychologist, 49, 294-303.
60. Kintsch, W. (1998) Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61. Koda, K. (1990). The use of L1 reading strategies in L2 reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 393-410.
62. Koda, K. (1997). Orthographic knowledge in L2 lexical processing: A cross-linguistic perspective. In J. Coady & T. Huckin (Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition (pp. 35-52). New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Leach, J., Scarborough, H., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 211-224.
64. Lesaux, N.K., Koda, K., Siegel, L.S., & Shanahan, T. (2006). Development of literacy of language minority learners. In D. L. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in a second language: Report of the National Literacy Panel. (pp. 75-122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Lipka, O., Lesaux, N.K., & Siegel, L.S. (2006). Retrospective analyses of the reading development of a group of Grade 4 disabled readers: Risk status and profiles over 5 years. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 364-378.
66. Lubke, G., & Muthèn, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10, 21-39.
67. MacGinitie, W., MacGinitie, R., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L.G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
68. Morris, D., Ervin, C., & Conrad, K. (1996). A case study of middle school reading disability. Reading Teacher, 49(5), 214-222.
69. Morris, J., Stuebing, K.K., Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Lyon, G.R., Shankweiler, D.P.,et al.(1998). Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 347-373.
70. Morsy, L., Kieffer, M.J., & Snow, C. (2010). Measure for measure: A critical consumers' guide to reading comprehension assessments for adolescents. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York. Retrieved September 21, 2009, fromhttp://www.carnegie.org/literacy/tta/pdf/tta_Morsy.pdf.
71. Murnane, R., & Levy, F. (1996). Teaching the new basic skills: Principles for educating children to thrive in a changing economy. New York: Martin Kessler.
72. Murnane, R., & Levy, F. (2004). The new division of labor: How computers are creating the next job market. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
73. Muthèn, B. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81-117.
74. Nagy, W.E., Berninger, V.W., & Abbott, R.D. (2006) Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134-147.
75. Nair, M. (2007). An analysis of the words appearing in middle school textbooks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
76. National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Nation's report card reading-2007, Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
77. Nylund, K.L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthèn, B.O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535-569.
78. Oakhill, J. (1993). Children's difficulties in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 223-237.
79. Oakhill, J., Yuill, N., & Parkin, A. (1986). On the nature of the difference between skilled and less-skilled comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 9, 80-91.
80. Pearson, P.D., Hiebert, E.H., & Kamil, M.L. (2007). Vocabulary assessment: What we know and what we need to learn. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 282-296.
81. Perfetti, C.A. (1988). Verbal efficiency in reading ability. In M. Daneman, G. E. Mackinnon, & T.G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 6, pp. 109-143). Boston: Academic Press.
82. RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
83. Rathbun, A., West, J., & Hausken, E.G. (2004). From kindergarten through third grade: Children's beginning school experiences (NCES 2004-007). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
84. Ready, D., & Tindal, G. (2006). An investigation of language minority children: Demographic characteristics, initial performance, and growth in achievement (Rep. No. 686). Los Angeles: Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies.
85. Roser, N., & Juel, C. (1982). Effects of vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension. In J. A. Niles & L. A. Harris (Eds.), Yearbook of the National Reading Conference: Vol. 31. New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 110-118). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
86. Rumbaut, R.G., Massey, D.S., & Bean, F.D. (2006). Linguistic life expectancies: Immigrant language retention in Southern California. Population and Development Review, 32, 447-460.
87. Samson, J., & Lesaux, N.K. (2009). Language minority learners in special education: Rates and predictors of identification for services. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 148-162.
88. Schneider, W. (1993). Domain-specific knowledge and memory performance in children. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 257-274.
89. Scott, J.A., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Asslin, M. (2003). Vocabulary instruction throughout the day in twenty-three upper elementary classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 103, 269-283.
90. Seigneuric, A., Ehrlich, M.F., Oakhill, J., & Yuill, N. (2000). Working memory resources and children's reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 81-103.
91. Shankweiler, D. (1989). How problems of comprehension are related to difficulties decoding. In D. Shankweiler & I. Y. Liberman (Eds.), Phonology and reading disabilities: Solving the reading puzzle (pp. 35-68). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
92. Snow, C., Burns, M., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
93. Speece, D.L. (1995). Cluster analysis in perspective. Exceptionality, 5, 31-44.
94. Speece, D.L. (2003). The methods of cluster analysis and the study of learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 501-513). New York: Guilford.
95. Stahl, S.A., & Nagy, W.E. (2006). Teaching word meanings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
96. Stoller, F., & Grabe, W. (1995). Implications for L2 vocabulary acquisition and instruction fromL1 vocabulary research. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 24-45). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
97. Swanborn, M.S.W., & de Glopper, K. (1999). Incidental word learning while reading: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 261-285.
98. Swanson, H.L. (1996). Swanson Cognitive Processing Test. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
99. Swanson, H.L., & Sàez, L. (2003). Memory difficulties in children and adults with learning disabilities. In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 182-198). New York: Guilford.
100. Swanson, H.L., & Siegel, L.S. (2001). Learning disabilities as a working memory deficit. Issues in Education, 7, 1-48.
101. Sweet, A., & Snow, C.E. (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension. New York: Guilford.
102. Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15, 55-64.
103. Torgesen, J.K., Houston, D.D., Decker, S.M., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J.,et al.(2007). Academic literacy instruction for adolescents: A guidance document fromthe center on instruction. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
104. Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
105. Touchstone Applied Science Associates. (2004). Degrees of reading power(2004). New York: College Board.
106. Verhoeven, L. (1990). Acquisition of reading in a second language. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 90-114.
107. Verhoeven, L.T. (2000). Components in early second language reading and spelling. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 313-330.
108. Watts, S.M. (1995). Vocabulary instruction during reading lessons in six classrooms. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 399-424.
109. White, C. (2007, April). Piloting a vocabulary intervention for middle school readers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, IL.
110. White, K.R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 461-481.
111. Woodcock, R.W. (1991). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery-Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
112. Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2005). Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24(3), 4-12.
113. Yuill, N., Oakhill, J., & Parkin, A. (1989). Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 351-361.