Probing the brain substrates of cognitive processes responsible for context effects on recognition memory

Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 519-544

  Vakil, Eli ^a   Raz, Tal ^a   Levy, Daniel A ^b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b INTERDISCIPLINARY CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Aging; Association; Context effect; Frontal lobe; Medial temporal lobe; Source memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN CORTEX; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77956354613     PISSN: 13825585     EISSN: 17444128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13825581003690182     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Brown, M. W., & Aggleton, J. P. (2001). Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 51-61.
2. Benton, A. L., & Hamsher, K. (1976). Multilingual aphasia examination manual. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
3. Cansino, S., Maquet, P., Dolan, R. J., & Rugg, M. D. (2002). Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 1048-1056.
4. Craik, F. I. M. (1982). Selective changes in encoding as a function of reduced processing capacity. In R. Klix, J. Hoffman & E. Van Der Meer (Eds), Coding and knowledge representation: Processes and structures in human memory. Amsterdam: Elsevier, North Holland.
5. Craik, F. I. M., Routh, D. A., & Broadbent, D. E. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences, 302, 341-359.
6. Davidson, P. S. R., & Glisky, E. L. (2002). Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 174-186.
7. Delis, D. C., Kramer, J., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1987). The California Verbal Learning Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
8. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478.
9. Dennis, N. A., Hayes, S. M., Prince, S. E., Madden, D. J., Huettel, S. A., & Cabeza, R. (2008). Effects of aging on the neural correlates of successful item and source memory encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 791-808.
10. Dobbins, I. G., & Han, S. (2006) Cue- versus probe-dependent prefrontal cortex activity during contextual remembering. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1439-1452.
11. Dobbins, I. G., Foley, H., Schacter, D., & Wagner, A. (2002). Executive control during retrieval: Multiple prefrontal processes subserve source memory. Neuron, 35, 989-996.
12. Duarte, A., Ranganath, C., & Knight, R. T. (2005). Effects of unilateral prefrontal lesions on familiarity, recollection, and source memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 8333-8337.
13. Eichenbaum, H. & Cohen, N. J. (2001). From conditioning to conscious recollection: Memory systems of the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Fernandez, A., & Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 333-345.
15. Gallo, D. A., Cotel, S. C., Moore, C. D., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Aging can spare recollection- based retrieval monitoring: The importance of event distinctiveness. Psychology & Aging, 22, 209-213.
16. Glisky, E. L., & Kong, L. L. (2008). Do young and older adults rely on different processes in source memory tasks? A neuropsychological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 809-822.
17. Glisky, E. L., Polster, M. R., & Routhieaux, B. C. (1995). Double dissociation between item and source memory. Neuropsychology, 9, 229-235.
18. Glisky, E. L., Rubin, S. R., & Davidson, P. S. R. (2001). Source memory in older adults: An encoding or retrieval problem? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1131-1146.
19. Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 325-331.
20. Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory? British Journal of Psychology, 71, 99-104.
21. Gutchess, A. H., Hebrank, A., Sutton, B. P., Leshikar, E., Chee, M. W. L., Tan, J. C., Goh, J. O. S., & Park, D. C. (2007). Contextual interference in recognition memory with age. NeuroImage, 35, 1338-1347.
22. Hannula, D. E., Ryan, J. D., Tranel, D. & Cohen, N. J. (2007). Rapid onset relational memory effects are evident in eye movement behavior, but not in hippocampal amnesia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1690-1705.
23. Hart, R. P., Kwentus, J. A., Wade, J. B., & Taylor, J. R. (1988). Modified Wisconsin sorting test in elderly normal depressed and demented patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2, 49-56.
24. Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., & Chrosniak, L. D. (1989). Aging and source monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 4, 106-112.
25. Hollingworth, A. (2006). Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 58-69.
26. Howard, M. W., Fotedar, M. S., Datey, A. V., & Hasselmo, M. E. (2005). The temporal context model in spatial navigation and relational learning: Toward a common explanation of medial temporal lobe function across domains. Psychological Review, 112, 75-116.
27. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: Measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 3-22.
28. Janowsky, J. S., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1989). Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1043-1056.
29. Kan, I. P., Giovanello, K. S., Schnyer, D. M., Makris, N., & Verfaellie, M. (2007). Role of the medial temporal lobes in relational memory: Neuropsychological evidence from a cued recognition paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2589-2597.
30. Kramer, J. H., Rosen, H. J., Du, A. T., Schuff, N., Hollnagel, C., Weiner, M. W., Miller, B. L., & Delis, D. C. (2005). Dissociations in hippocampal and frontal contributions to episodic memory performance. Neuropsychology, 19, 799-805.
31. Levy, D. A., Rabinyan, E., & Vakil, E. (2008). Forgotten but not gone: Context effects on recognition memory do not require explicit context memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1620-1628.
32. Manier, D., Apetroaia, I., Pappas, Z., & Hirst, W. (2004). Implicit contributions of context to recognition. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 471-483.
33. Mayes, A. R., Meudell, P. R., & Som, S. (1981). Further similarities between amnesia and normal attenuated memory: Effect with paired-associate learning and contextual shifts. Neuropsychologia, 19, 655-664.
34. Mayes, A. R., Holdstock, J. S., Isaac, C. L., Montaldi, D., Grigor, J., Gummer, A., Cariga, P., Downes, J. J., Tsivilis, D., Gaffan, D., Gong, Q., & Norman, K. A. (2004). Associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions and relatively normal item recognition. Hippocampus, 14, 763-784.
35. Mitchell, K. J., Raye, C. R., McGuire, J. T., Frankel, H., Greene, E. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2008). Neuroimaging evidence for agenda-dependent monitoring of different features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 780-790.
36. Moscovitch, M. (1994a). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds), Memory systems (pp. 269-310). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
37. Moscovitch, M. (1994b). Cognitive resources and dual-task interference effects at retrieval in normal people: The role of the frontal lobes and medial temporal cortex. Neuropsychology, 8, 524-534.
38. Murnane, K., & Phelps, M. P. (1993). A global activation approach to the effect of changes in environmental context on recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 882-894.
39. Murnane, K., & Phelps, M. P. (1994). When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model. Memory & Cognition, 22, 584-590.
40. Murnane, K., Phelps, M., and Malmberg, K. (1999). Context-dependent recognition memory: The ICE theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 403-415.
41. Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Craik, F. I. M. (1995). Memory for context and its use in item memory: Comparisons of younger and older persons. Psychology and Aging, 10, 284-293.
42. Nicolas, S., and Carbonnel, S. (1996). Implicit memory for new associations: The pictorial influence. Psychological Research, 59, 145-156.
43. Parker, A., & Gellatly, A. (1997). Moveable cues: A practical method for reducing contextdependent forgetting. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 163-173.
44. Prince, S. E., Daselaar, S. M., & Cabeza, R. (2005). Neural correlates of relational memory: Successful encoding and retrieval of semantic and perceptual associations. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 1203-1210.
45. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
46. Rudy, J. W., & Sutherland, R. J. (1995). Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration. Hippocampus, 5, 375-389.
47. Rugg, M. D., Fletcher, P. C., Chua, P. M.-L., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). The role of the prefrontal cortex in recognition memory and memory for source: A fMRI study. Neuroimage, 10, 520-529.
48. Russo, R., & Parkin, A. J. (1993). Age differences in implicit memory and awareness in younger and older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 62-74.
49. Russo, R., Ward, G., Geurts, H., & Scheres, A. (1999). When unfamiliarity matters: Changing environmental context between study and test affects recognition memory for unfamiliar stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 488-499.
50. Shimamura, A. P., & Squire. L. R. (1991). The relationship between fact and source memory: Findings from amnesic patients and normal subjects. Psychobiology, 19, 1-10.
51. Simons, J. S., Owen, A. M., Fletcher, P. C., & Burgess, P. W. (2005a). Anterior prefrontal cortex and the recollection of contextual information. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1774-1783.
52. Simons, J. S., Gilbert, S. J., Owen, A. M., Fletcher, P. C., & Burgess, P. W. (2005b). Distinct roles for lateral and medial anterior prefrontal cortex in contextual recollection. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 813-820.
53. Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 203-220.
54. Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342-353.
55. Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1994). Memory for facts, source, and context: Can frontal lobe dysfunction explain age-related differences? Psychology and Aging, 9, 149-159.
56. Spencer, W. D., & Raz, N. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 10, 527-539.
57. Squire, L. R., Stark, C. E. L., & Clark, R. E. (2004). The medial temporal lobe. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 279-306.
58. Swick, D., Senkfor, A. J., & Van Petten, C. (2006). Source memory retrieval is affected by aging and prefrontal lesions: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Brain Research, 1107, 161-176.
59. Thaiss, L., & Petrides, M. (2003). Source versus content memory in patients with a unilateral frontal cortex or a temporal lobe excision. Brain, 126, 1112-1126.
60. Troyer, A. K., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 161-171.
61. Troyer, A. K., Winocur, G. W., Craik, F. I. M., & Moscovitch, M. (1999). Source memory and divided attention: Reciprocal cost to primary and secondary tasks. Neuropsychology, 13, 467-474.
62. Vakil, E. (2005). The effect of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) on different aspects of memory: A selective review. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 977-1021.
63. Vakil, E., & Blachstein, H. (1997). Rey AVLT: Developmental norms for adults and the sensitivity of different memory measures to age. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 356-369.
64. Vakil, E., & Hoffman, Y. (2004). A dissociation between perceptual and conceptual skill learning: The differential effect of divided attention. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 653-666.
65. Vakil, E., Biederman, Y., Liran, G., Groswasser, Z. & Aberbuch, S. (1994). Head-injured patients and control group: Implicit versus explicit measures of frequency of occurrence. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 539-546.
66. Vakil, E., Golan, H., Grunbaum, E., Groswasser, Z. & Aberbuch, S. (1996a). Direct and indirect measures of contextual information in brain-injured patients. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 9, 176-181.
67. Vakil, E., Melamed, M., & Even, N. (1996b). Direct and indirect measures of contextual information: Older versus younger adult subjects. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 3, 30-36.
68. Vakil, E., Openheim, M., Falck, D., Aberbuch, S., & Groswasser, Z. (1997). Indirect influence on modality on direct memory for words and their modality: Closed-headinjured and control participants. Neuropsychology, 111, 545-551.
69. Vakil, E., Raz, T., & Levy, D. A. (2007). The multifactorial nature of recognition memory context effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 916-923.
70. Vingerhoets, G., Vermeule, E., & Santens, P. (2005). Impaired intentional content learning but spared incidental retention of contextual information in non-demented patients with Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychologia, 43, 675-681.
71. Wechsler, D. A. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
72. Wechsler, D. (1987). Manual for the Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.