MRI planimetry for diagnosis and follow-up of valve area in mitral stenosis treated with valvuloplasty

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 178, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 781-786

  Djavidani, Behrus ^a   Debl, K ^a   Buchner, S ^a   Lipke, C ^a   Nitz, W ^a   Feuerbach, S ^a   Riegger, C ^a   Luchner, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Heart; Mitral stenosis; MR imaging; Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty; Planimetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VALVULOPLASTY; ANATOMY; BALLOON DILATATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; BALLOON DILATATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748448288     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926876     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Mahnken AH, Gunther RW, Krombach GA. The basics of left ventricular functional analysis with MRI and MSCT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1349-1354
2. Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Poetsch T et al. Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 2002; 144: 329-334
3. Djavidani B, Debl K, Lenhart M et al. Planimetry of mitral valve stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 2048-2053
4. Debl K, Djavidani B, Seitz J et al. Planimetry of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 631-636
5. Inoue K, Okawi T, Nakamura T et al. Clinical application of transvenous mitral commissurotomy by a new balloon catheter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 87: 394-402
6. Vilacosta I, Iturralde E, San Roman JA et al. Transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring of percutaneous mitral balloon valvulotomy. Am J Cardiol 1992; 70: 1040-1044
7. Gorlin R, Gorlin SG. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves and central circulatory shunts. Am Heart J 1951; 41: 1-29
8. Hatte L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A et al. Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1979; 60: 1096-1104
9. Come PT, Riley MF, Diver DL et al. Noninvasive assessment of mitral stenosis before and after percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 817-825
10. Pitsavos CE, Stefanadis CI, Stratos CG et al. Assessment of accuracy of the Doppler pressure half-time method in the estimation of the mitral valve area immediately after balloon mitral valvuloplasty. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 455-463
11. Thomas JD, Wilkins GT, Choong CYP et al. Inaccuracy of mitral pressure half-time immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy: dependence on transmitral gradient and left atrial and ventricular compliance. Circulation 1988; 78: 980-993
12. Levin TN, Feldman T, Carroll JD. Effect of atrial septal occlusion on mitral valve area after Inoue balloon valvotomy. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1994; 33: 308-314
13. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Balloon Valvuloplasty Registry. Multicenter experience with balloon mitral commissurotomy: NHLBI balloon valvuloplasty registry report on immediate and 30-day follow-up results. Circulation 1992; 85: 448-461
14. Reyes VP, Raju BS, Wynne J et al. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty compared with open surgical commissurotomy for mitral stenosis. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 961-967
15. Lin SJ, Brown PA, Watkins MP et al. Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 133-137