Review and reward within the computerised peer-assessment of essays

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 321-333

  Davies, Phil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; Computer aided assessment; Peer assessment; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956031861     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930802071072     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bhalerao, A., and A. Ward. 2001. Towards electronically assisted peer assessment: A ase study. Association of Learning Technology Journal 9, no. 1: 26-37.
2. Bostock, S. 2000. Student peer assessment. http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/aa/landt/lt/docs/bostock_peer_assessment.htm.
3. Boud, D., R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. 1999. Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 24, no. 4: 413-26.
4. Brown, S., P. Race, and J. Bull. 1999. Computer-assisted assessment in higher education. London: SEDA.
5. Bull, J., and C. McKenna. 2004. Blueprint for computer-assisted assessment. London: Routledge-Falmer.
6. Davies, P. 2000. Computerized peer-assessment. Innovations in Education & Teaching International 37, no. 4: 346-55.
7. Davies, P. 2003. Closing the communications loop on the computerized peer assessment of essays. Association of Learning Technology Journal 11, no. 1: 41-54.
8. Davies, P. 2004. Don't write just mark: The validity of assessing student ability via their computerized peer-marking of an essay rather than their creation of an essay. Association of Learning Technology Journal 12, no. 3: 263-79.
9. Davies, P. 2005. Weighting for computerized peer-assessment to be accepted. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual International CAA Conference, ed. M. Danson, 179-92. Leicestershire: Loughborough University.
10. Davies, P. 2006. Peer-assessment: Judging the quality of student work by the comments not the marks? Innovations in Education & Teaching International 43, no. 1: 69-82.
11. De Volder, M., M. Rutjens, A. Slootmaker, H. Kurvers, M. Bitter, R. Kappe, H. Roossink, J. de Goeijen, and H. Reitzema. 2007. Espace: A new web-tool for peer assessment with in-built feedback quality system. http://www.cluteinstitute.com/Programs/Hawaii-2007/Article%20172.pdf.
12. Dochy, F., M. Segers, and D. Sluijsmans. 1999. The use of self-, peer- and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education 24, no. 3: 331-50.
13. Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
14. Falchikov, N., and J. Goldfinch. 2000. Student peer-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research 70, no. 3: 287-22.
15. Parsons, R. 2003. Self, peer and tutor assessment of text online: Design, delivery and analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th International CAA Conference (July), ed. J. Christie, 315-26. Leicestershire: Loughborough University.
16. Robinson, J. 2002. In search of fairness: An application of multi-reviewer anonymous peer-review in a large class. Journal of Further and Higher Education 26, no. 2: 183-92.
17. Topping, K. 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research 68, no. 3: 249-76.