Identity and biography as mediators of science and mathematics faculty's involvement in K-12 service

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 743-766

  Skerrett, Allison ^a   Sevian, Hannah ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency; College faculty; Higher education; Identity; Professional development; Social justice

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956010418     PISSN: 18711502     EISSN: 18711510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-009-9235-0     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Andrews, D., Heaton, R., & Lewis, J. (2007). Engaging mathematicians in the mathematical education of teachers. Paper presented at the math and science partnership network conference. Washington, DC.
2. Astin, A., Korn, W., & Dey, E. (1991). The American college teacher: National norms for the 1989-90 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute.
3. Baez, B. (2002). Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. In C. S. Turner, A. L. Antonio, M. Garcia, A. Nora, & C. Presley (Eds.), Racial and ethnic diversity in higher education (pp. 151-168). Boston: Pearson.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Brandt, C. B. (2008). Discursive geographies in science: Space, identity, and scientific discourse among indigenous women in higher education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 703-730.
6. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. New York: Routledge.
7. Carr, K. (2002). Building bridges and crossing borders: Using service learning to overcome cultural barriers to collaboration between science and education departments. School Science and Mathematics, 10, 285-299.
8. Donaldson, E. L., & Emes, C. G. (2000). The challenge for women academics: Reaching a critical mass in research, teaching, and service. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 3, 33-56.
9. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
10. Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
11. Holland, D. C., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Jaeger, A. J., & Thornton, C. H. (2006). Neither honor nor compensation: Faculty and public service. Educational Policy, 20, 345-366.
13. Knowles, G. J. (1992). Models for understanding pre-service and beginning teachers' biographies: Illustrations from case studies. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers' lives (pp. 99-152). New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Link, A. N., Swann, C. A., & Bozeman, B. (2008). A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review, 27(4), 363-374.
15. Lorber, J. (2006). "Night to his day": The social construction of gender. In P. S. Rothenberg (Ed.), Race, class and gender in the United States: An integrated study (6th ed., pp. 54-68). New York: Worth.
16. Lundmark, C. (2002). The FIRST project for reforming undergraduate science teaching. BioScience, 52, 552.
17. Marsteller, P. A., & Quinones, C. (2003). Building a center for science education: Challenges and opportunities. Georgia Journal of Science, 61, 138-153.
18. McKinley, E. (2008). From object to subject: Hybrid identities of indigenous women in science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 959-975.
19. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Neumann, A., & LaPointe Terosky, A. (2007). To give and to receive: Recently tenured professors' experiences of service in major research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 282-310.
21. Oliveira, A. W., Sadler, T. D., & Suslak, D. F. (2006). The linguistic construction of expert identity in professor-student discussions of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 119-150.
22. Omi, M., & Winant, H. (2006). Racial formations. In P. S. Rothenberg (Ed.), Race, class and gender in the United States: An integrated study (Vol. 6, pp. 12-21). New York: Worth.
23. Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn't women's work count? Journal of Higher Education, 67, 46-84.
24. Rahm, J. (2007). Youths' and scientists' authoring of and positioning within science and scientists' work. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 517-544.
25. Roth, W.-M. (2007a). Emotion at work: A contribution to third-generation cultural-historical activity theory. Mind, Culture and Activity, 14(1-2), 40-63.
26. Roth, W.-M. (2007b). Theorizing passivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 1-8.
27. Roth, W.-M. (2007c). The ethico-moral nature of identity: Prolegomena to the development of third-generation cultural-historical activity theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 83-93.
28. Roth, W.-M., Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., Carambo, C., McKnight, Y., & Beers, J. (2004). Re/making identities in the praxis of urban schooling: A cultural historical perspective. Mind, Culture and Activity, 11(1), 48-69.
29. Tobin, K. (2009). Turning into others' voices: Radical listening, learning from difference, and escaping oppression. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4 (in press).
30. Tonso, K. L. (2006). Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 273-307.
31. Turner, J. H. (2002). Face to face: Toward a sociological theory of interpersonal behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.