The linguistic construction of expert identity in professor-student discussions of science

Cultural Studies of Science Education

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 119-150

  Oliveira, Alandeom W ^a   Sadler, Troy D ^b   Suslak, Daniel F ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency; Authority; Expertise; Identity; Inquiry based instruction; Linguistic signs

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249016933     PISSN: 18711502     EISSN: 18711510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11422-006-9039-4     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1998). Claiming power in doctor-patient talk. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 253-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Cicourel A. V. (1995). Medical speech events as resources for inferring differences in expert-novice diagnostic reasoning. In U. M. Quastoff (Ed.), Aspects of oral communication (pp. 364-387). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
4. Collins, J. (1996). Socialization to text: Structure and contradiction in schooled literacy. In M. Silverstein, & G. Urban (Ed.), Natural histories of discourse (pp. 203-228). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Davis, K. (1988). Power under the microscope. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
6. Erickson, F. (1996). Ethnographic microanalysis. In S. L. McKay, & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 283-306). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96, 606-633.
8. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9. Gunlogson, C. (2003). True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. New York: Routledge.
10. Heritage, J., & Greatbatch, D. (1986). Generating applause: A study of rhetoric and response at party political conferences. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 110-157.
11. Jakobson, R. (1960). Concluding statement: Linguistic and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp.350-377). Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Kishner, J. M., & Gibbs, R. W. (1996). How "just" gets its meanings: Polysemy and context in psychological semantics. Language and Speech, 39, 19-36.
13. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Matoesian, G. M. (2001). Law and the language of identity. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Mertz, E. (1996). Recontextualization as socialization: Text and pragmatics in the law school classroom. In M. Silverstein, & G. Urban (Eds.), Natural histories of discourse (pp. 229-249). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
17. Pierce, C. S. (1955). Logic as semiotic. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Pierce (pp. 98-119). New York: Dover.
18. Polman, J. L. (2004). Dialogic activity structures for project-based learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 431-466.
19. Putnam, H. (1996). The meaning of "meaning." In A. Pessin, &S. Goldberg (Eds.), The twin earth chronicles: Twenty years of reflection on Hilary Putnam's "The meaning of meaning" (pp. 3-52). London: M.E. Sharpe.
20. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). (pp. 492-498). UK: Blackwell Publishing.
21. Roth, W.-M., & Middleton, D. (2006). Knowing what you tell, telling what you know: uncertainty and asymmetries of meaning in interpreting graphical data. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 11-81.
22. Rowland, T. (1999). Pronouns in mathematics talk: Power, vagueness and generalization. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19, 19-25.
23. Schegloff, E. A. (1982). Discourse as interactional achievement: Some uses of "uh huh" and other things that come between sentences. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk (pp. 71-93). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
24. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Silverstein, M. (1992). The indeterminacy of contextualization: When enough is enough? In A. DiLuzio, & P. Auer (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 55-75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Silverstein M. (1995). Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description. In B. G. Blount (Ed.), Language, culture and society. Prospect Heights IL: Waveland Press Inc.
27. Silverstein M., & Urban G. (1996). The natural history of discourse. In M. Silverstein, & G. Urban (Eds.), Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Tabak, I., & Baumgartner, E. (2004). The teacher as partner: Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding. Cognition and Instruction, 22, 393-429.
29. Tannen, D. (1987). Repetition in conversation: Towards a poetics of talk. Language, 63, 574-605.
30. Waring, H. Z. (2002). Displaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35, 453-479.
31. Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF sequence: A proposal for the articulation of theories of activity and discourse for the analysis of teaching and learning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37.
32. Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
33. Wortham, S., & Rymes, B. (2003). Linguistic anthropology of education. Westport CT: Praeger Publishers.
34. Yngve, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. Paper presented at the meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.