Deleterious mutations and selection for sex in finite diploid populations

Genetics

Volumn 184, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1095-1112

  Roze, Denis ^a,b   Michod, Richard E ^c  

^a STATION BIOLOGIQUE DE ROSCOFF   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALLELE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELETION MUTANT; DIPLOIDY; GENDER; GENE CONVERSION; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC SELECTION; HETEROZYGOSITY; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HOMOZYGOSITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MITOSIS; MITOTIC RECOMBINATION; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; POPULATION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEX DETERMINATION; SIMULATION; ANIMAL; ASEXUAL REPRODUCTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; HETEROZYGOTE; MALE; MUTATION; SEX;

ALLELES; ANIMALS; DIPLOIDY; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENETIC LOCI; HETEROZYGOTE; MALE; MITOSIS; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; REPRODUCTION, ASEXUAL; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77955915226     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.108258     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. AGRAWAL, A. F., 2006 Evolution of sex: Why do organisms shuffle their genotypes? Curr. Biol. 16: R696-R704.
2. AGRAWAL, A. F., 2009 Spatial heterogeneity and the evolution of sex in diploids. Am. Nat. 174: S54-S70.
3. AGRAWAL, A. F., and S. P. OTTO, 2006 Host-parasite coevolution and selection on sex through the effects of segregation. Am. Nat. 168: 617-629.
4. AYLON, Y., and M. KUPIEC, 2004 DSB repair: the yeast paradigm. DNA Repair 3: 797-815.
5. BALLOUX, F., L. LEHMANN and T. DE MEUÛS, 2003 The population genetics of clonal and partially clonal diploids. Genetics 164: 1635-1644.
6. BARTON, N. H., 1995 A general model for the evolution of recombination. Genet. Res. 65: 123-144.
7. BARTON, N. H., and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1998 Why sex and recombination? Science 281: 1986-1990.
8. BARTON, N. H., and S. P. OTTO, 2005 Evolution of recombination due to random drift. Genetics 169: 2353-2370.
9. BARTON, N. H., and M. TURELLI, 1991 Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 127: 229-255.
10. BERNSTEIN, H., H. C. BYERLY, F. A. HOPF and R. E. MICHOD, 1985 Genetic damage, mutation, and the evolution of sex. Science 229: 1277-1281.
11. BERNSTEIN, H., F. A. HOPF and R. E. MICHOD, 1988 Is meiotic recombination an adaptation for repairing DNA, producing genetic variation, or both? pp. 139-160 in The Evolution of Sex: An Examination of Current Ideas, edited by R. E. MICHOD and B. R. LEVIN. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
12. BÜRGER, R., 2000 The Mathematical Theory of Selection, Recombination, and Mutation. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
13. CARR, L. L., and D. E. GOTTSCHLING, 2008 Does age influence loss of heterozygosity? Exp. Gerontol. 43: 123-129.
14. CHAMNANPUNT, J., W. SHAN and B. M. TYLER, 2001 High frequency mitotic gene conversion in genetic hybrids of the oomycete Phytophthora sojae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 14530-14535.
15. CHARLESWORTH, B., 1990 Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 55: 199-221.
16. CHARLESWORTH, B., 1993 Directional selection and the evolution of sex and recombination. Genet. Res. 61: 205-224.
17. CHARLESWORTH, B., and D. CHARLESWORTH, 1997 Rapid fixation of deleterious alleles can be caused by Muller's ratchet. Genet. Res. 70: 63-73.
18. CHARLESWORTH, D., M. T. MORGAN and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1993a Mutation accumulation in finite outbreeding and inbreeding populations. Genet. Res. 61: 39-56.
19. CHARLESWORTH, D., M. T. MORGAN and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1993b Mutation accumulation in finite populations. J. Hered. 84: 321-325.
20. CHEN, J.-M., D. N. COOPER, N. CHUZHANOVA, C. FÉREC and G. P. PATRINOS, 2007 Gene conversion:mechanisms, evolution and human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8: 762-775.
21. ELENA, S. F., and R. E. LENSKI, 1997 Test of synergistic interactions among deleterious mutations in bacteria. Nature 390: 395-397.
22. FELSENSTEIN, J., and S. YOKOHAMA, 1976 The evolutionary advantage of recombination. II. Individual selection for recombination. Genetics 83: 845-859.
23. GANDON, S., and S. P. OTTO, 2007 The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis. Genetics 175: 1835-1863.
24. GARCÍA-DORADO, A., and A. CABALLERO, 2000 On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations. Genetics 155: 1991-2001.
25. GARCÍA-DORADO, A., C. LÓPEZ-FANJUL and A. CABALLERO, 2004 Rates and effects of deleterious mutations and their evolutionary consequences, pp. 20-32 in Evolution of Molecules and Ecosystems, edited by A. MOYA and E. FONT. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
26. GORDO, I., and P. R. A. CAMPOS, 2008 Sex and deleterious mutations. Genetics 179: 621-626.
27. GUILLEMIN, M.-L., S. FAUGERON, C. DESTOMBE, F. VIARD, J. A. CORREA et al., 2008 Genetic variation in wild and cultivated populations of the haploid-diploid red alga Gracilaria chilensis: how farming practices favor asexual reproduction and heterozygosity. Evolution 62: 1500-1519.
28. GUPTA, P. K., A. SAHOTA, S. A. BOYADJIEV, S. BYE, S. SHAO et al., 1997 High frequency in vivo loss of heterozygosity is primarily a consequence of mitotic recombination. Cancer Res. 57: 1188-1193.
29. HAAG, C. R., and D. ROZE, 2007 Genetic load in sexual and asexual diploids: segregation, dominance and genetic drift. Genetics 176: 1663-1678.
30. HADANY, L., and T. BEKER, 2007 Sexual selection and the evolution of obligatory sex. BMC Evol. Biol. 7: 245.
31. HAGSTROM, S. A., and T. P. DRYJA, 1999 Mitotic recombination map of 13cen-13q14 derived from an investigation of loss of heterozygosity in retinoblastomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 2952-2957.
32. HALLIGAN, D. L., and P. D. KEIGHTLEY, 2009 Spontaneous mutation accumulation studies in evolutionary genetics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 151-172.
33. HASTINGS, W. K., 1970 Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57: 97-109.
34. HELLEDAY, T., 2003 Pathways for mitotic homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Mutat. Res. 532: 103-115.
35. HILL, W. G., and A. ROBERTSON, 1966 The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection. Genet. Res. 8: 269-294.
36. HOLT, D., M. DREIMANIS, M. PFEIFFER, F. FIRGAIRA, A. MORLEY et al., 1999 Interindividual variation in mitotic recombination. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65: 1423-1427.
37. HOULE, D., K. A. HUGHES, S. ASSIMACOPOULOS and B. CHARLESWORTH, 1997 The effect of spontaneous mutation on quantitative traits. II. Dominance of mutations with effects on life-history traits. Genet. Res. 70: 27-34.
38. ILES, M. M., K. WALTERS and C. CANNINGS, 2003 Recombination can evolve in large finite populations given selection on sufficient loci. Genetics 165: 2249-2258.
39. IRA, G., D. SATORY and J. E. HABER, 2006 Conservative inheritance of newly synthesized DNA in double-strand-break-induced gene conversion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26: 9424-9429.
40. JOHNSON, R. D., and M. JASIN, 2001 Double-strand-break-induced homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 29: 196-201.
41. JUDD, S. R., and T. D. PETES, 1988 Physical lengths of meiotic and mitotic gene conversion tracts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 118: 401-410.
42. KEENEY, S., and M. J. NEALE, 2006 Initiation of meiotic recombination by formation of DNA double-strand breaks: mechanisms and regulation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34: 523-525.
43. KEENEY, S., C. N. GIROUX and N. KLECKNER, 1997 Meiosis-specific double-strand breaks are catalyzed by Spo11, a member of a widely conserved protein family. Cell 88: 375-384.
44. KEIGHTLEY, P. D., and S. P. OTTO, 2006 Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations. Nature 443: 89-92.
45. KIRKPATRICK, M., and C. D. JENKINS, 1989 Genetic segregation and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Nature 339: 300-301.
46. KIRKPATRICK, M., T. JOHNSON and N. H. BARTON, 2002 General models of multilocus evolution. Genetics 161: 1727-1750.
47. KONDRASHOV, A. S., 1988 Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction. Nature 336: 435-440.
48. LENORMAND, T., and S. P. OTTO, 2000 The evolution of recombination in a heterogeneous environment. Genetics 156: 423-438.
49. LETTIER, G., Q. FENG, A. ANTÙNEZ DE MAYOLO, N. ERDENIZ, R. J. D. REID et al., 2006 The role of DNA double-strand breaks in spontaneous homologous recombination in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2: 1773-1786. (Pubitemid 44813575)
50. LIANG, F., M. HAN, P. J. ROMANIENKO and M. JASIN, 1998 Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 5172-5177.
51. MANDEGAR, M. A., and S. P. OTTO, 2007 Mitotic recombination counteracts the benefits of genetic segregation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 274: 1301-1307.
52. MARTIN, G., S. P. OTTO and T. LENORMAND, 2006 Selection for recombination in structured populations. Genetics 172: 593-609.
53. MAYNARD SMITH, J., 1988 The evolution of recombination, pp. 106-125 in The Evolution of Sex: An Examination of Current Ideas, edited by R. E. MICHOD and B. R. LEVIN. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
54. NAGYLAKI, T., 1993 The evolution of multilocus systems under weak selection. Genetics 134: 627-647.
55. OMILIAN, A. R., M. E. A. CRISTESCU, J. L. DUDYCHA and M. LYNCH, 2006 Ameiotic recombination in asexual lineages of Daphnia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 18638-18643.
56. OTTO, S. P., 2003 The advantages of segregation and the evolution of sex. Genetics 164: 1099-1118.
57. OTTO, S. P., 2009 The evolutionary enigma of sex. Am. Nat. 174: S1-S14.
58. OTTO, S. P., and N. H. BARTON, 1997 The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics 147: 879-906.
59. OTTO, S. P., and N. H. BARTON, 2001 Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution 55: 1921-1931.
60. OTTO, S. P., and M. W. FELDMAN, 1997 Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination. Theor. Popul. Biol. 51: 134-147.
61. OTTO, S. P., and S. L. NUISMER, 2004 Species interactions and the evolution of sex. Science 304: 1018-1020.
62. PÂQUES, F., and J. E. HABER, 1999 Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63: 349-404.
63. PETERS, A. D., and C. M. LIVELY, 1999 The red queen and fluctuating epistasis: a population genetic analysis of antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat. 154: 393-405.
64. PRADO, F., F. CORTÉS-LEDESMA, P. HUERTAS and A. AGUILERA, 2003 Mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 42: 185-198.
65. PRUGNOLLE, F., D. ROZE, A. THÉRON and T. DE MEEÛS, 2005 F-statistics under alternation of sexual and asexual reproduction: a model and data from schistosomes (Platyhelminth parasites). Mol. Ecol. 14: 1355-1365.
66. PYLKOV, K. V., L. A. ZHIVOTOVSKY and M. W. FELDMAN, 1998 Migration versus mutation in the evolution of recombination under multilocus selection. Genet. Res. 71: 247-256.
67. RICE, W. R., 2002 Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 241-251.
68. RICHARDSON, C., M. E. MOYNAHAN and M. JASIN, 1998 Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocations. Genes Dev. 12: 3831-3842. (Pubitemid 29024846)
69. ROZE, D., 2009 Diploidy, population structure and the evolution of recombination. Am. Nat. 174: S79-S94.
70. ROZE, D., and N. H. BARTON, 2006 The Hill-Robertson effect and the evolution of recombination. Genetics 173: 1793-1811.
71. ROZE, D., and T. LENORMAND, 2005 Self-fertilization and the evolution of recombination. Genetics 170: 841-857.
72. SALATHÉ, M., R. SALATHÉ, P. SCHMID-HEMPEL and S. BONHOEFFER, 2006 Mutation accumulation in space and the maintenance of sexual reproduction. Ecol. Lett. 9: 941-946.
73. SALATHÉ, M., R. D. KOUYOS, R. R. REGOES and S. BONHOEFFER, 2008 Rapid parasite adaptation drives selection for high recombination rates. Evolution 62: 295-300.
74. SHAO, C., L. DENG, O. HENEGARU, L. LIANG, N. RAIKWAR et al., 1999 Mitotic recombination produces the majority of recessive fibroblast variants in heterozygous mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 9230-9235.
75. SIEBER, O. M., K. HEINIMANN, P. GORMAN, H. LAMLUM, M. CRABTREE et al., 2002 Analysis of chromosomal instability in human colorectal adenomas with two mutational hits at APC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 16910-16915.
76. SZAFRANIEC, K., D. M. WLOCH, P. SLIWA, R. H. BORTS and R. KORONA, 2003 Small fitness effects and weak genetic interactions between deleterious mutations in heterozygous loci of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genet. Res. 82: 19-31.
77. TISCHFIELD, J. A., 1997 Loss of heterozygosity or: how I learned to stop worrying and love mitotic recombination. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61: 995-999.
78. UYENOYAMA, M. K., and B. O. BENGTSSON, 1989 On the origin of meiotic reproduction: a genetic modifier model. Genetics 123: 873-885.
79. VASSILIEVA, L. L., A. M. HOOK and M. LYNCH, 2000 The fitness effect of spontaneous mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Evolution 54: 1234-1246.
80. VIRGIN, J. B., J. P. BAILEY, F. HASTA, J. NEVILLE, A. COLE et al., 2001 Crossing over is rarely associated with intragenic mitotic recombination in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 157: 63-77.