Robust fault diagnosis for atmospheric reentry vehicles: A case study

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A:Systems and Humans

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 886-899

  Falcoz, Alexandre ^a   Henry, David ^b   Zolghadri, Ali ^b  

^a AIRBUS GROUP INNOVATIONS   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ BORDEAUX 1   (France)

Author keywords

Fault detection and isolation (FDI); reusable launch vehicles (RLVs); robustness; sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ASTRIUM; ATMOSPHERIC RE-ENTRY VEHICLES; AUTO-LANDING; CENTER OF GRAVITY; COLLABORATIVE EFFORTS; COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT; CPU TIME; DESIGN PROCEDURE; DESIGN STAGE; DETECTION TIME; EUROPEAN AERONAUTIC DEFENCE AND SPACES; EUROPEAN LEVELS; EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY; FAULT DETECTION AND ISOLATION; FAULT SENSITIVITY; FLAP ACTUATORS; FLIGHT TRAJECTORY; GENERALIZED STRUCTURED SINGULAR VALUE; GUIDANCE , NAVIGATION , AND CONTROLS; HEALTHY CONTROLS; IN-PLANE; KEY FEATURE; MONTE CARLO; NONLINEAR BENCHMARK; OUT-OF-PLANE; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; PHASE BASED; REALISTIC OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS; REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLES; ROBUST FAULT DIAGNOSIS; ROBUST MODELS; ROBUST STRATEGY; ROBUSTNESS; SENSITIVITY; SIMULATION RESULT; SPECIFIC DIAGNOSIS; SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS; VEHICLE MOTION;

BENCHMARKING; DESIGN; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; LAUNCH VEHICLES; LAUNCHING; MONTE CARLO METHODS; QUALITY ASSURANCE; REENTRY; RELIABILITY; REUSABLE ROCKETS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS); VEHICLES;

FAULT DETECTION;

EID: 77955849604     PISSN: 10834427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2063022     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. M. James and L. Dubon, "An autonomous diagnostic and prognostic monitoring system for NASA's deep space network," in Proc. IEEE Aerosp. Conf., 2000, vol.2, pp. 403-414.
2. D. Bernard, G. Dorais, E. Gamble, B. Kanefsky, J. Kurien, G. Man, W. Millar, N. Muscettola, P. Nayak, K. Rajan, N. Rouquette, B. Smith, W. Taylor, and Y.-W. Tung, "Spacecraft autonomy flight experience: The DS1 remote agent experiment," in Proc. AIAA, Albuquerque, NM, 1999, pp. 28-30.
3. J. Dunphy, Y. Tung, P. Nayak, and M. Clark, "Validation and verification of the remote agent for spacecraft autonomy," in Proc. IEEE Aerosp. Conf., 1999, vol.1, pp. 449-468.
4. N. Muscettola, P. Nayak, B. Pell, and B. Williams, "Remote agent: To boldly go where no AI system has gone before," Artif. Intell., vol. 103, no. 1/2, pp. 5-47, Aug. 1998.
5. J. DeKleer and B. Williams, "Diagnosing multiple faults," Artif. Intell., vol.32, no.1, pp. 97-130, Apr. 1987.
6. S. Osder, "Practical view of redundancy management\Application and theory," AIAA J. Guid., Control Dyn., vol.22, no.1, pp. 12-21, 1999.
7. M. Blanke, M. Kinnaert, M. Lunze, and M. Staroswiecki, Diagnosis and Fault Tolerant Control. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
8. N. Odintsova, I. Rish, and S. Ma, "Multi-fault diagnosis in dynamic systems," IBM T.J. Watson Res. Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 2004.
9. G. Biswas, M. Cordier, J. Lunze, L. Travé-Massuyès, and M. Staroswiecki, "Diagnosis of complex systems: Bridging the methodologies of the FDI and DX communities," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, Cybern., vol.34, no.5, pp. 2159-2162, Oct. 2004.
10. S. Singh, A. Kodali, K. Choi, K. R. Pattipati, S. M. Namburu, S. C. Sean, D. V. Prokhorov, and L. Qiao, "Dynamic multiple fault diagnosis: Mathematical formulations and solution techniques," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol.39, no.1, pp. 160-176, Jan. 2009.
11. L. Jianhui, M. Namburu, K. R. Pattipati, Q. Liu, and S. Chigusa, "Integrated model-based and data-driven diagnosis of automotive antilock braking systems," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol.40, no.2, pp. 321-336, Mar. 2010.
12. V. Venkatasubramanian, R. Rengaswamy, K. Yin, and S. Kavuri, "A review of process fault detection and diagnosis. Part 1: Quantitative model-based methods," Comput. Chem. Eng., vol.27, no.3, pp. 293-311, Mar. 2003. (Pubitemid 36285962)
13. R. Patton, P. Frank, and R. Clark, Issues of Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. London, U.K.: Springer-Verlag, 2000.
14. R. Isermann, "Model-based fault detection and diagnosis\Status and applications," Annu. Rev. Control, vol.29, no.1, pp. 71-85, 2005.
15. S. Ding, Model-based Fault Diagnosis Techniques\Design Schemes, Algorithms, and Tools. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2008.
16. N. de Freitas, "Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering for fault diagnosis," in Proc. IEEE Aerosp. Conf., 2001, pp. 1767-1772.
17. V. Verma, J. Langford, and R. Simmons, "Non-parametric fault identification for space rovers," in Proc. iSAIRAS, J.-C. Piedboeuf, Ed., Jun. 2001.
18. F. Hutter and R. Dearden, "Efficient on-line fault diagnosis for non-linear systems," in Proc. iSAIRAS, Nara, Japan, May 19-23, 2003.
19. R. Dearden, T. Willeke, R. Simmons, V. Verma, F. Hutter, and S. Thrun, "Real-time fault detection and situational awareness for rovers: Report on the Mars technology program task," in Proc. IEEE Aerosp. Conf., 2004, pp. 826-840.
20. R. Patton, F. Uppal, S. Simani, and B. Polle, "A Monte Carlo analysis and design for FDI of a satellite attitude control system," in Proc. SAFEPROCESS, 2006, pp. 1393-1398.
21. ∞ estimators," in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. SMC, 2004, vol.6, pp. 5195-5200.
22. H. Castro, S. Bennani, and A. Marcos, "Integrated vs decoupled fault detection filter and flight control law designs for re-entry vehicle," in Proc. IEEE Comput. Aided Control Syst. Des., IEEE Int. Conf. Control Appl., IEEE Int. Symp. Intell. Control, Munich, Germany, Oct. 4-6, 2006, pp. 3295-3300.
23. R. Agustin, R. Mangoubi, R. Hain, and N. Adams, "Robust failure detection for reentry vehicle attitude control systems," J. Guid. Control Dyn., vol.22, no.6, pp. 839-845, 1999.
24. D. Henry and A. Zolghadri, "Design and analysis of robust residual generators for systems under feedback control," Automatica, vol.41, no.2, pp. 251-264, Feb. 2005.
25. D. Henry and A. Zolghadri, "Norm-based design of robust FDI schemes for uncertain systems under feedback control: Comparison of two approaches," Control Eng. Pract., vol.14, no.9, pp. 1081-1097, Sep. 2006.
26. W. Morris, N. H. White, and R. G. Caldwell, "HL-20 operations and support requirements for the Personnel Launch System mission," J. Spacecraft Rockets, vol.30, no.5, pp. 597-605, 1993.
27. J.-L. Boiffier, The Dynamics of Flight. The Equations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 1998.
28. C. V. der Linden, "DASMAT-Delft University aircraft simulation model and analysis tool," Faculty Aerosp. Eng., Delft Univ. Technol., Delft, The Netherlands, Rep. LR-781, 1996.
29. P. Menon, I. Postlethwaite, S. Bennani, A. Marcos, and D. Bates, "Robustness analysis of a reusable launch vehicle flight control law," Control Eng. Pract., vol.17, no.7, pp. 751-765, Jul. 2009.
30. A. Falcoz, D. Henry, and A. Zolghadri, "A nonlinear fault identification scheme for reusable launch vehicles control surfaces," Int. Rev. Aerosp. Eng., vol.1, no.5, pp. 447-457, 2008.
31. V. Morio, F. Cazaurang, A. Zolghadri, and P. Vernis, "Onboard path planning for reusable launch vehicles. Application to the shuttle orbiter reentry mission," Int. Rev. Aerosp. Eng., vol.1, no.6, pp. 492-503, 2008.
32. - LPV filters for fault diagnosis: Some new results," in Proc. 7th IFAC Symp. Fault Detection, Supervision Safety Tech. Processes, 2009, pp. 420-425.
33. - filters," J. Guid. Control Dyn., vol.31, no.3, pp. 699-711, 2008.
34. P. Frank, E. Alcorta-Garcia, and B. Köppen-Seliger, "Modelling for fault detection and isolation versus modelling for control," Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst., vol.7, no.1, pp. 1-46, Mar. 2001.
35. J. Cockburn and B. Morton, "Linear fractional representations of uncertain systems," Automatica, vol.33, no.7, pp. 1263-1271, Jul. 1997.
36. J. Magni, S. Bennani, and J. Dijkgraaf, An Overview of System Modelling in LFT Form\Advanced Techniques for Clearance of Flight Control Laws. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2002.
37. J. Magni, Linear fractional representations with a toolbox: Modelling, order reduction gain scheduling, version 1.3, ONERA, Syst. Control Flight Dyn. Dept., Toulouse, France, Tech. Rep. TR 6/08162 DCSD. [Online]. Available: http://www.cert.fr/dcsd/idco/perso/Magni/
38. J. Chen and R. Patton, Robust Model-Based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 1999.
39. S. Ding, T. Jeinsch, P. Frank, and E. Ding, "A unified approach to the optimization of fault detection systems," Int. J. Adapt. Control Signal Process., vol.14, no.7, pp. 725-745, Nov. 2000.
40. S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 1994, ser. Studies in Applied Mathematics.
41. X. Ding and L. Guo, "Observer based optimal fault detector," in Proc. 13th IFAC World Congr., 1996, pp. 187-192.
42. A. Emami-Naeini, M. Akhter, and S. Rock, "Effect of model uncertainty on failure detection: The threshold selector," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol.33, no.12, pp. 1106-1115, Dec. 1988.
43. M. Rank and H. Niemann, "Norm based design of fault detectors," Int. J. Control, vol.72, no.9, pp. 773-783, Jun. 1999.
44. R. Tütüncü, K. Toh, and M. Todd, SDPT3\A Matlab Software Package for Semidefinite-Quadratic-Linear Programming, ver. 3.0, 2001.
45. M. Basseville and I. Nikiforov, Detection of Abrupt Changes. Theory and Application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1993, ser. Information and System Sciences.