The quality of message ideas, thinking and interaction in an asynchronous CMC environment;La qualité des messages d’idées, de la pensée et de l’interaction dans un environnement CMC asynchrone;Die Qualität der übermittlung von Ideen, Denken und Interaktion in einem asynchronen CMC Umfeld

Educational Media International

Volumn 40, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 115-126

  Khine, Myint Swe ^a   Yeap, Lay Leng ^a   Chin Lok, Anthony Tan ^b  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^b SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23844432028     PISSN: 09523987     EISSN: 14695790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0952398032000092161     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. [Line 4587]Ahern, TC, Peck, K and Laycock, M (1992) The effects of teacher discourse in computer-mediated discussion, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 8, 3, 291-309.
2. Badger, A (2000) Keeping it fun and relevant: using active online learning. In White, K and Weight, B (eds) The Online Teaching Guide, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA, pp. 124-141.
3. Barnes, S (2003) Campus-Mediated Communication: Human-To-Human Communication across the Internet, Prentice-Hall, Boston, MA.
4. Bonk, C, Hansen, EJ, Grabner, MM, Lazar, S and Mirabelli, C (1998) Time to 'connect': Synchronous and asynchronous case-based dialogue among preservice teachers. In Bonk, C and King, K (eds) Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centred Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp. 289-314.
5. [Line 4709]Davie, L and Wells, R (1991) Empowering the learner through computer-mediated communication, The American Journal of Distance Education, 5, 1, 15-23.
6. [Line 4739]Doherty, P (2001) Student success in an asynchronous learning environment, Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 15, 1, 12-16.
7. Fogarry, R (1995) Best Practices for the Learner-Centered Classroom, Skylight, Illinois.
8. [Line 4789]Grubcr, S (1995) Re: ways we contribute: students, instructors, and pedagogies in the computer-mediated writing classroom. Computers and Composition, 12, 1, 61-78.
9. Hacker, D and Niederhauer, D (2000) Promoting deep and durable learning in the online classroom. In Weiss, R, Knowlton, D and Speck, B (2000) Principles of Effective Teaching in the Online Classroom. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 53-63.
10. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In Kaye AR (ed.) Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 117-135.
11. Hew KF (2001) Evaluating the extent of participation and quality of thinking among pre-service teachers in an asynchronous online discussion environment. MA in Instructional Design and Technology dissertation, Nanyang Technological University, Institute of Education, Singapore.
12. Hoffman, P and Lemke, D (2000) Teaching and Learning in a Network World, IOS Press, Amsterdam.
13. [Line 4928]Johnson, SD, Aragon, SR. Shaik, N and Palma-Rivas, N (2000) Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and facc-to-face learning environments, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11, 1, 29-49.
14. Kang, I (1998) The Use of Computer-Mediated Communication: Electronic Collaboration and Interactivity. In Bonk, C and King, K (eds) Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centred Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp. 315-337.
15. Lai, KW (1998) Social interaction and communication in a web-based tertiary course: some observations, Proceedings of ICCE '98, pp. 79-85.
16. [Line 5020]Landis, JR and Koch, GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
17. Lee, IS (2000) Factors affecting learners: discourse participation in a computer conferencing, ERIC Document Number: ED439698, 2000.
18. MeKendree, J, Lee, J, Dineen, F and Mayes, JT (1998) The Vicarious Learners: Helping Students 'Listen In' to Learn. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI.
19. [Line 5097]McKenzie, W and Murphy. D (2000) 'I hope this goes somewhere': evaluation of an online discussion group, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16, 3, 239-257.
20. Moore, G., Winograd, K and Lange, D (2001) You Can Teach Online: Building a Creative Learning Environment, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
21. Nally, R (1995) Designing computer-mediated conferencing into instruction. In Collins, M and Berge, Z (eds) Computer mediated communication and the online classroom, Volume II: Higher education, Hampton Press, New Jersey, pp. 11-23.
22. [Line 5184]O'Grady, G (2001) Maximising the potential of computer mediated discussion: guidelines for facilitation. CDTL Brief, 4, 4, 1-7.
23. Priest, L (2000) The story of one learner: a student's perspective on online teaching. In White. K and Weight. B (eds) The online Teaching Guide, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA, pp. 37-44.
24. Salmon, G (2001) E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. Kogan-Page, London.
25. Sutton, LA (2000) Vicanous Interaction: A Learning Theory for Computer-Mediated Communications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
26. [Line 5290]Swan, K. Shea, P, Fredericksen, E. Pickett, A, Petz, W and Maher, G (2000) Building knowledge building communities: consistency, contact and communication in the virtual classroom, Journal of Educational Computing Research. 23, 4, 359-383.
27. Swam, RJ and Parks, S (1994) Infusing the Teaching of Critical and Creative Thinking into Content Instruction. A Lesson Design Handbonk for the Elementary Grades. Critical Thinking Press. California.
28. Winiecki, D and Chyung. Y (1998) Keeping the Thread: Helping Distance Students and Instructors Keep Track of Asynchronous Disscusions. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching & Learning. Madison, WI.