Critiquing a Colleague's Forensic Advisory Report: A Suggested Protocol for Application to Child Custody Evaluations

Journal of Child Custody

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 37-64

  Gould, Jonathan W ^a   Kirkpatrick, H D ^b   Austin, William G ^c   Martindale, David A ^d  

^a Charlotte Psychotherapy and Consultation Group   (United States)

^b Private Practice   (United States)

^c Practicing clinical and forensic psychologist   (United States)

^d Forensic Psychology   (United States)

Author keywords

Child custody; Critique work product; Review work product; Second opinion

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955731884     PISSN: 15379418     EISSN: 1537940X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J190v01n03_04     Document Type: Article

References (140)

1. Ackerman, M. J. (2001). Clinician’s guide to child custody evaluations (2nded.). New York: Wiley.
2. Ackerman, M. J., and Kane, A.W. (1998). Psychological experts in divorce actions (3rd ed.). New York: Aspen Law and Business.
3. Ahrons, C. (1994). The good divorce: Keeping your family together when you marriage comes apart. New York: HarperPerennial.
4. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1979). Object relations, dependency, and attachment: A theoretical review of the infant-mother relationship. Child Development, 40, 969-1025.
5. Ake v. Oklahoma, 470 U.S. 68 (1985).
6. Amato, P. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1269-287.
7. Amato, P. R. (2001). Children of divorce in the 1990: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(3), 355-370.
8. Amato, P. R., and Gilbreth, J. G. (1999). Nonresident fathers and children’s well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 557-574.
9. Amato, P. R., and Keith, B. (1991). Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 26-46.
10. Amato, P. R., and Sobolewski, J. M. (2001). The effects of divorce and marital discord on adult children’s psychological well being. American Sociological Review, 66, 900921.
11. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (1997). Practice parameters for child custody evaluation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36(10 Suppl.), 57S-68S.
12. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (1990). Guidelines for psychosocial evaluation of suspected sexual abuse in young children. Chicago, IL: Author.
13. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (1995a). Psychosocial evaluation of suspected psychological maltreatment in children and adolescents. Chicago, IL: Author.
14. American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children. (1995b). Practice guidelines: Use of anatomical dolls in child sexual abuse assessments. Chicago, IL: Author.
15. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principals of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
16. American Psychological Association. (1994). Guidelines for child custody evaluation in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49, 677-680.
17. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
18. American Psychological Association, Office of Ethnic and Minority Affairs. (1990). Guidelines for providing services to ethnic, linguistic, and culturally diverse populations. American Psychologist, 48, 45-48.
19. Association of Family and Conciliation Courts. (1995). TheAFCC model standards of practice for child custody evaluations. Madison, WI: Author.
20. Austin, W. G. (2000a). Assessing credibility in allegations of martial violence in the high-conflict child custody case. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 462-477.
21. Austin, W. G. (2000b). Relocation law and the threshold of harm: Integrating legal and behavioral perspectives. Family Law Quarterly, 34, 63-82.
22. Austin, W. G. (2000c). A forensic psychology model of risk assessment for child custody relocation law. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 186-201.
23. Austin, W. G. (2001). Partner violence and risk assessment in child custody evaluations. Family Court Review, 39, 483-496.
24. Austin, W. G. (2002). Guidelines for utilizing collateral sources of information in child custody evaluations. Family Court Review, 40, 177-184.
25. Austin, W. G., and Kirkpatrick, H. D. (2004). The investigation component in forensic mental health evaluations: Considerations for parenting time assessments. Journal of Child Custody, 1(2), 23-46.
26. Bagby, R. M., Nicholson, R. A., Buis, T., Radovanovic, H., and Fidler, B. J. (1999). Defensive responding in the MMPI-2 in family custody and access evaluations. Psychological Assessment, 11(1), 24-28.
27. Bancroft, L., and Silverman, J. G. (2002). The batterer as parent: Addressing the impact of domestic violence on family dynamics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Baris, M. A., Coates, C. A., Duvall, B. B. Garrity, C. B., Johnson E. T., and LaCrosse, E. R. (2001). Working with high-conflict families of divorce: A guide for professionals. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
29. Bathurst, K., Gottfried, A. W., and Gottfried, A. E. (1997). Normative data for the MMPI-2 in child custody litigation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 9, 205-211.
30. Bauserman, R. (2002). Child adjustment in joint-custody versus sole-custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 91-102.
31. Binggeli, N. J., Hart, S. N., and Brassard, M. R. (2001). Psychological maltreatment of children. APSAC Study Guides 4. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
32. Biringen, Z., Greve, J., Howard, W., Leith, D., Tanner, L., Moore, S., Sakoguchi, S., and Williams, L. et al. (2002). Commentary on Warshak’s “Blanket restrictions: Overnight contact between parents and young children.” Family Court Review, 40, 204-207.
33. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
34. Braver, S. L., Ellman, I. M., and Fabricius, W. V. (in press). Relocation of children after divorce and children’s best interests: New evidence and legal considerations. Journal of Family Psychology.
35. Braver, S. L., and O’Connell, O. (1998). Divorced dads: Shattering the myths. New York: Tarcher/Putnam.
36. Briere, J., Berliner, L., Bulkley, J. A., Jenny, C., and Reid, T. (Eds.) (2001). The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
37. Bruch, C. S. (2001). Parental alienation syndrome and parental alienation: Getting it wrong in child custody cases. Family Law Quarterly, 35, 527-552.
38. Calloway, G. C. (1997). Ethical issues in the professional role of critiquing child custody evaluations. The North Carolina Psychologist, November-December, 10-11.
39. Cassidy, J., and Shaver, P. R. (Eds.) (1999). Handbook of attachment. New York: Guilford.
40. Ceci, S. J., and Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
41. Ceci, S. J., and Hembrooke, H. (1998). Expert witnesses in child abuse cases: What can and should be said in court. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Clawar, S. S., and Rivlin, B. (1991). Children held hostage: Dealing with programmed and brainwashed children. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association Family Law Section.
43. Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 336-345.
44. Cuthbert, C., Slote, K., Driggers, M. G., Mesh, C. J., Bancroft, L., and Silverman, J. (2002). Battered mothers speak out: A human rights report on domestic violence and child custody in the Massachusetts family courts. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Center of Women.
45. Depner, C. E., and Bray, J. H. (Eds.) (1993). Nonresidential parenting: New vistas in family living. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Ellsworth, P., and Levy, R. (1969). Legislative reform of child custody adjudication: An effort to rely on social science data in formulating legal policies. Law and Society Review, 4, 167-233.
47. Emery, R. E. (1999). Marriage, divorce, and children’s adjustment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Epstein, E. S. (2001). The attorney-client privilege and the work product doctrine (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
49. Ewing, C. P. (2003). Expert testimony: Law and practice. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of psychology, forensic psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 55-66). New York: Wiley.
50. Fabricius, W.V., and Hall, J.A. (2000). Young adults’ perspectives on divorce: Living arrangements. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 446-461.
51. Faller, K. C. (1999). Maltreatment in early childhood: Tools for research based intervention. New York: Haworth Press.
52. Friedrich, W. N. (2002). Psychological assessment of sexually abused children and their families. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
53. Galatzer-Levy, R. M. and Kraus, L. (Eds.) (1999). The scientific basis of child custody decisions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
54. Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Grove, W. M., and Stejskal, W. J. (2001). Toward a resolution of the Rorschach controversy. Psychological Assessment, 14, 433-448.
55. Gardner, R. A. (2001). “Should courts order PAS children to visit/reside with the alienated parent? A follow-up study.” American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19, 61-106.
56. Garrity, C. B., and Baris, M. A. (1994). Caught in the middle: Protecting the children of high-conflict divorce. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
57. Goldstein, A. M. (Ed.). (2003). Handbook ofpsychology: Forensic psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Wiley.
58. Gould, J. W. (1998). Conducting scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Gould, J. W. (1999a). Scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Part One: A model for interdisciplinary collaboration in the development of psycholegal questions guiding court-ordered child custody evaluations. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 37, 64-73.
60. Gould, J. W. (1999b). Conducting scientifically crafted child custody evaluations: Part Two: A paradigm for the forensic evaluation of child custody determination. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 37(2), 135-158.
61. Gould, J. W. (2001). A protocol for offering a critique of a colleague’s forensic work product. Handling of a relocation case. Proceedings of the American Bar Association, Family Law Section, Spring CLE Meeting, 343-358.
62. Gould, J. W., and Bell, L. C. (2000). Forensic methods and procedures applied to child custody evaluations: What judges need to know in determining a competent forensic work product. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 38(2), 21-27.
63. Gould, J. W., and Lehrmann, D. (2002). Evaluating the probative value of child custody evaluations. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 53(2), 17-30.
64. Gould, J. W., and Stahl, P. (2000). The art and science of child custody evaluations: Integrating clinical and forensic mental health models. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 392-414.
65. Gould, J. W., and Stahl, P. (2001). Never paint by the numbers: A response to Kelly and Lamb (2000), Solomon and Biringen (2000), and Lamb and Kelly (2001). Family Court Review, 39, 372-376.
66. Graham-Bermann, S. A., and Edleson, J. L. (Eds.) (2001). Domestic violence in the lives of children: The future of research, intervention, and social policy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
67. Greenberg, L., and Gould, J. W. (2001). The treating expert: A hybrid role with firm boundaries. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 469-478.
68. Greenberg, S. A., and Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28,50-57.
69. Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments. New York: Plenum.
70. Heilbrun, K. (1995). Child custody evaluation: Critically assessing mental health experts and psychological tests. Family Law Quarterly, 29, 63-78.
71. Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
72. Heilbrun, K., Warren, J., and Picarello, K. (2003). Thirdparty information in forensic assessment. In A. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 69-86). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
73. Heinze, M. C., and Grisso, T. (1996). Review of instruments assessing parenting competencies used in child custody evaluations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 14, 293-313.
74. Hess, A. K. (1998). Accepting forensic case referrals: Ethical and professional considerations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 29, 109-114.
75. Hetherington, E. M., Bridges, M., and Insabella, G. M. (1998). What matters? What does not? Five perspectives on the association between marital transitions and children’s adjustment. American Psychologist, 53, 167-184.
76. Hetherington, E. M., and Kelley, J. (2002). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York: Norton.
77. Holden, G. W., Geffner, R., and Jouriles, E. N. (1998) (Eds.). Children exposed to marital violence: Theory, research, and applied issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
78. Hynan, D. J. (1998). Interviewing children in custody evaluations. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 36, 466-478.
79. Jaffe, P. G., and Geffner, R. (1998). Child custody disputes and domestic violence: Critical issues for mental health, social service, and legal professionals. In G. W. Holden, R. Geffner, and E. N. Jouriles (Eds.), Children exposed to marital violence: Theory, research, and applied issues (pp. 371-408). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
80. Jaffe, P. G., Lemon, N. K. D., and Poisson, S. E. (2003). Child custody and domestic violence: A call for safety and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
81. Johnston, J. R., and Campbell, L. E. G. (1988). Impasses of divorce: The dynamics and resolution of family conflict. New York: Free Press.
82. Johnston, J. R., and Campbell, L. E. G. (1993). A clinical typology of interparental violence in disputed custody divorces. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, 190-199.
83. Johnston, J. R., and Girdner, L. K. (2001). Family abductors: Descriptive profiles and family interventions. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice Prevention.
84. Johnston, J., and Roseby, V. E. (1997). In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. New York: The Free Press.
85. Kelly, J. B., and Johnston, J. R. (2001). The alienated child: A reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Family Court Review, 39, 249-266.
86. Kelly, J. B., and Lamb, M. E. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 297-311.
87. Kirkpatrick, H. D. (2004). A floor, not a ceiling: Beyond guidelines-an argument for minimum standards of practice in conducting child custody and visitation evaluations. Journal of Child Custody, 1(1), 61-75.
88. Krauss, D. A., and Sales, B. D. (2000). Legal standards, expertise, and experts in the resolution of contested child custody cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and the Law, 6, 843-879.
89. Kuehlne, K. (1996). Assessing allegations ofchild sexual abuse. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press.
90. Kuehnle, K., Coulter, M., and Firestone, G. (2000). Child protection evaluations: The forensic stepchild. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 368-391.
91. Lamb, M. E. (1997). Fathers in child development: An introductory overview and guide. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 1-18). New York: Wiley.
92. Lamb, M. E. (2000). The history of research on father involvement: An overview. Marriage and Family Review, 29(2-3), 23-42.
93. Lamb, M. E. (2002). Placing children’s interests first. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law, 10, 98-119.
94. Lamb, M. E., and Kelly, J. B. (2001). Using the empirical literature to guide the development of parenting plans for young children. Family Court Review, 39, 365-371.
95. Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., and Thompson, R. A. (1997). The effects of divorce and custody arrangements on children’s behavior, development, and adjustment. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 35, 393-404.
96. Lassiter, G., Deater-Deckard, K., Dunn, J., and Davies, L. (2002). Support across generations: Children’s closeness to grandparents following divorce and remarriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 363-376.
97. Lee, S. M., and Olesen, N. W. (2001). Assessing alienation in child custody and access evaluations. Family Court Review, 39, 282-298.
98. Lyon, T. D. (1999). The new wave in children’s suggestibility research: A critique. Cornell Law Review, 84, 1004-1105.
99. Maccoby, E. E., and Mnookin, R. H. (1992). Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100. Main, M. (1996). Introduction to the special section on attachment and psychopathology: 2. Overview of the field of attachment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(2), 237-243.
101. Martindale, D. A. (2001). Cross-examining mental health experts in child custody litigation. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 29(4), 483-511.
102. Masten, A. S., and Coatsworth, J. D. (1998). The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments. American Psychologist, 53, 205-220.
103. McCann, J. T., Flens, J. R., Campagna, V., Colman, P., Lazzaro, T., and Conner, E. (2001). The MCMI-III in child custody evaluations: A normative study. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1, 27-44
104. Medoff, D. (2003). The scientific basis of psychological testing: Considerations following Daubert, Kumho and Joiner. Family Court Review, 41(2), 199-213.
105. Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., and Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
106. Metropolitan Denver Interdisciplinary Committee. (1997). The child custody evaluation: The MDICC aspirational guidelines. Denver, CO: Author.
107. Mullender, A., Hague, G., Imam, U., Kelly, L., Malos, E., and Regan, L. (2002). Children’s perspectives on domestic violence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishers.
108. New Jersey State Board of Psychological Examiners. (1993). Specialty guidelines for psychologists [sic.] Custody/visitation evaluations. Newark, NJ: Division of Consumer Affairs, New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety.
109. North Carolina Psychological Association. (1994). Child custody guidelines. Raleigh, NC: Author.
110. Okpaku, S. R. (1976). Psychology: Impediment or aid in child custody cases? Rutgers Law Review, 29, 1117-1153.
111. Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., and Barcus, E. H. (2000). The use of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 312-340.
112. Otto, R. K., and Heilbrun, K. (2002). The practice of forensic psychology: A look toward the future in light of the past. American Psychologist, 57(1), 5-18.
113. Poole, D. A., and Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
114. Rohner, R. P., and Veneziano, R. A. (2001). The importance of father love: History and contemporary evidence. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 382-405
115. Rogers, R. (1995). Diagnostic and structured interviewing: A handbook for psychologists. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
116. Roseby, V. (1995). Uses of psychological testing in a child-focused approach to child custody evaluations. Family Law Quarterly, 29, 97-110.
117. Rosenthal, R., Hiller, J. B., Bornstein, R. F., Berry, D. T. R, and Brunell-Neuleib, S. (2001). Meta-analytic methods, the Rorschach, and the MMPI. Psychological Assessment, 14, 449-451.
118. Schutz, B. M., Dixon, E. B., Lindenberger, J. C., and Ruther, N. J. (1989). Solomon’s sword. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
119. Shuman, D. W. (1994). Psychiatric and psychological evidence (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
120. Shuman, D. W., and Sales, B. D. (1998). The admissibility of expert testimony based upon clinical judgment and scientific research. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 4(4), 1226-1252.
121. Shuman, D. W., and Sales, B. D. (1999). The impact of Daubert and its progenty on the admissibility of behavioral and social science evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(1), 3-15.
122. Shuman, D. W. (2002). The role of mental health experts in custody decisions: Science, psychological tests, and clinical judgment. Family Law Quarterly, 36(1), 135-162.
123. Skafte, D. (1985). Child custody evaluations: A practical guide. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
124. Solomon, J., and Biringen, Z. (2001). Another look at the developmental research. Family Court Review, 39, 355-364.
125. Stacey, J., and Biblarz, T. J. (2001). Does the sexual orientation of parents matter? American Sociological Review, 66, 159-183.
126. Stahl, P. (1994). Conducting child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
127. Stahl, P. (1996). Second opinions: An ethical and professional process for reviewing child custody evaluations. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 34, 386-395.
128. Stahl, P. M. (1999). Complex issues in custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
129. Stoltz, J. M., and Ney, T. (2002). Resistance to visitation: Rethinking child and parental alienation. Family Court Review, 40, 220-231.
130. Sullivan, M. J., and Kelly, J. B. (2001). Legal and psychological management of cases with an alienated child. Family Court Review, 39, 299-315.
131. Wallerstein, J. S. and Kelly, J. B. (1980). Surviving the breakup: How children and parents cope with divorce. New York: Basic Books.
132. Wallerstein, J. S., and Tanke, T. J. (1996). To move or not to move: Psychological andle- gal considerations in the relocation of children following divorce. Family Law Quarterly, 30, 305-332
133. Warshak, R. A. (1996). Gender bias in child custody decisions. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 34, 396-409.
134. Warshak, J. W. (2000a). Blanket restrictions: Overnight contact between parents and young children. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 422-445.
135. Warshak, J. W. (2000b). Social science and children’s best interests in relocation cases: Burgess revisited. Family Law Quarterly, 34, 83-113.
136. Warshak, R. A. (2001). Divorce poison. New York: Regan.
137. Weiner, I. B. (2001). Advancing the science of psychological assessment: The Rorschach inkblot method as exemplar. Psychological Assessment, 13, 423-432.
138. Weissman, H. N. (1991). Child custody evaluations: Fair and unfair professional practices. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9, 469-476.
139. Weissman, H. N., and DeBow, D. M. (2003). Ethical principles and professional competencies. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Forensic psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 33-53). New York: Wiley.
140. Whiteside, M. F. (1998). Custody for children: Age 5 and younger. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 36, 479-502.