GUIDELINES FOR UTILIZING COLLATERAL SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS

Family Court Review

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 177-184

  Austin, William G ^a  

^a Northwest Colorado Psychological Services   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010088117     PISSN: 15312445     EISSN: 17441617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.2002.tb00828.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Althaus v. Cohen, 562 Pa. 547 (2000).
2. American Psychological Association. (1994). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49, 677–679.
3. Austin, W. G. (2000a). Assessing credibility in allegations of marital violence in the high conflict child custody case. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 462–477.
4. Austin, W. G. (2000b). A forensic psychology model of risk assessment for child custody relocation law. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 186–201.
5. Austin, W. G. (2000c). Relocation law and the threshold of harm: Integrating legal and behavioral perspectives. Family Law Quarterly, 34, 63–82.
6. Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to validity of experiments in social settings, Psychological Bulletin, 54, 297–312.
7. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.
8. D.A.S. v. People, 863 P.2d 291 (Colo. 1993).
9. Dissolution of Marriage–Parental Responsibility Act, 14 Colorado Revised Statutes, § 10–127(1)(II)(2)(a)(1999).
10. Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). A few can catch a liar. American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.
11. Gould, J. W. (1998). Conducting scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Gould, J. W. (1999). Scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Part two: A paradigm for forensic evaluation. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 37, 135–158.
13. Hedrick, M. (1998, November). Comprehensive child custody evaluations. Workshop sponsored by the American Academy of Forensic Psychologists, St. Louis, MO.
14. Heilbrun, K., & Warren, J. (1999, May). Third party iformation in inforensic assessment. Workshop sponsored by the American Academy of Forensic Psychology, Philadelphia.
15. Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
16. Porter, S., Woodworth, M., & Birt, A. R. (2000). Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 643–658.
17. Schutz, B. M., Dixon, E. B., Lidenberger, J. C., & Ruther, N. J. (1989). Solomon's sword: A practical guide to conducting child custody evaluations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Skafte, D. (1985). Child custody evaluations: A practical guide. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19. Stahl, P. M. (1994). Conducting child custody evaluations: A comprehensive guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Sternberg, K. J., Lamb, M. E., & Dawud-Noursi, S. (1998). Using multiple informants to understand domestic violence and its effects. In G. W. Holden, R. Geffner, & E. N. Jouriles (Eds.), Children exposed to marital violence (pp. 121–156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Weisman, H. N. (1991). Child custody evaluations: Fair and unfair professional practices. Behavioral Science and the Law, 9, 469–476.
22. Woody, R. H. (2000). Child custody: Practice standards, ethical issues, and legal safeguards for mental health professionals. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources Press.