SCIENTIFICALLY CRAFTED CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATIONS: Part One: A Model for Interdisciplinary Collaboration in the Development of Psycholegal Questions Guiding Court-Ordered Child Custody Evaluations

Family Court Review

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 64-73

  Gould, Jonathan W ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002042342     PISSN: 15312445     EISSN: 17441617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.1999.tb00528.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ackerman, M. J. (1995). Clinician's guide to child custody evaluations. New York. John Wiley.
2. Ackerman, M. J., & Ackerman, M. (1996). Child custody evaluation practices: A 1996 survey of psychologists. Family Law Quarterly, 30(3), 565–586.
3. Ackerman, M. J., & Ackerman, M. (1997). Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28(2), 137–145.
4. American Psychological Association (APA). (1994). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49(7), 677–680.
5. Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC). (1995). Model standards of practice for child custody evaluation. Madison, WI: Author.
6. Brodzinsky, D. M. (1993). On the use and misuse of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24(2), 213–219.
7. Commitee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15(6), 655–665.
8. Gindes, M., & Otto, R. (1997). Communicating the results of the evaluation with attorneys, courts, parties, or others. Children, divorce, and custody: Lawyers and psychologists working together (pp. 1353–1371). Chicago, IL: American Bar Association.
9. Gould, J. (1998a). Conducting scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Gould, J. (1998b). A paradigm for forensic evaluation of child custody determinations. Manuscript under review.
11. Greenberg, S. (1996, June). Child-custody evaluations. Workshop sponsored by The American Board of Professional Psychology Summer Institute, Post Graduate Study in Psychology, Portland, OR.
12. Greenberg, S. A., & Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 28, 50–57.
13. Grisso, T. (1988). Competency to stand trail evaluations: A manual for practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.
14. Heilbrun, K. (1995). Child custody evaluations: Critically assessing mental health experts and psychological tests. Family Law Quarterly, 29(1), 63–78.
15. Jameson, B. J., Ehrenberg, M. F. & Hunter, M. A. (1997). Psychologists ratings of the best interst-of-the-child custody and access criterion: A family systems assessment model. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 28(3), 253–262.
16. North Carolina Psychological Association. (1994). Child custody guidelines. Raleigh: Author. Schutz, B. M., Dixon, E. B., Lindenberger, J. C., & Ruther, N. J. (1989). Solomon's sword: A practical guide to conducting child custody evaluations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Shapiro, D. L. (1991). Forensic psychological assessment: An integrative approach. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
18. Stahl, P. M. (1994). Conducting child custody evaluations: A comprehensive guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.