NEVER PAINT BY THE NUMBERS: A Response to Kelly and Lamb (2000), Solomon and Biringen (2001), and Lamb and Kelly (2001)

Family Court Review

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 372-376

  Gould, Jonathan W ^a   Stahl, Philip M ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937334847     PISSN: 15312445     EISSN: 17441617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.2001.tb00619.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. American Bar Association, Family Law Section (2000). High-conflict custody cases: Reforming the system for children (Report of the Wingspread Conference). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Austin, W. (2000). A forensic psychology model of risk assessment for child relocation law. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 192–207.
3. Ellis, E. M. (2001). Guidelines for conducting parental fitness evaluations. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19(1), 5–40.
4. Emery, R. (1999). Marriage, divorce, and children's adjustment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Gould, J. W. (1998). Conducting scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Gould, J. W. (1999a). Scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Part 1: A model for interdisciplinary collaboration in the development of psycholegal questions guiding court-ordered child custody evaluations. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 37, 64–73.
7. Gould, J. W. (1999b). Scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Part 2: A paradigm for forensic evaluation of child custody determination. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 37, 159–178.
8. Gould, J. W., & Bell, L. C. (2000). Forensic methods and procedures applied to child custody evaluations: What judges need to know in determining a competent forensic work product. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 38(2), 21–27.
9. Gould, J. W., & Stahl, P. M. (2000). The art and science of child custody evaluations: Integrating clinical and forensic mental health models. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 392–414.
10. Kelly, J. (2000). Children's adjustment in conflicted marriage and divorce: A decade review of research. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(8), 963–973.
11. Kelly, J. B., & Lamb, M. E. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 297–311.
12. Lamb, M. E., & Kelly, J. B. (2001). Using the empirical literature to guide the development of parenting plans for young children: A rejoinder to Solomon and Biringen. Family Court Review, 39, 365–371.
13. Solomon, J., & Biringen, Z. (2001). Another look at the developmental research: Commentary on Kelly and Lamb's “Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family Court Review, 39, 355–364.
14. Stahl, P. M. (1994). Conducting child custody evaluations: A comprehensive guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Stahl, P. M. (1999). Complex issues in child custody evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Warshak, R. (2000). Blanket restrictions: Overnight contact between parents and young children. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 38, 422–445.
17. Whiteside, M. (1998). Custody for children age 5 and younger. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 36, 479–502.