A Floor, Not a Ceiling: Beyond Guidelines–An Argument for Minimum Standards of Practice in Conducting Child Custody and Visitation Evaluations

Journal of Child Custody

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 61-75

  Kirkpatrick, H D ^a  

^a Graduate School in San Francisco   (United States)

Author keywords

Child; Custody; Evaluations; Family law; Guidelines; Parameters; Practice; Standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746524794     PISSN: 15379418     EISSN: 1537940X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J190v01n01_05     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. (1997). Practice parameters for child custody evaluations. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 57S-68S.
2. American Academy of Psychiatry & the Law. (1995). Ethical guidelines for the practice of forensic psychiatry. Retrieved December 22,1998,.
3. American Law Institute. (2002a). Press release: American Law Institute publishes principles of the law of family dissolution. Retrieved May 15, 2002.
4. American Law Institute. (2002b). Principles of the law of family dissolution: Analysis and recommendations. San Francisco: Matthew Bender & Co.
5. American Psychological Association. (1994). Guidelines for child custody evaluations in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49, 677-682.
6. American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060-1073.
7. Association of Family and Conciliation Courts. (1995). Model standards of practice for child custody evaluation. Madison, WI: Author.
8. Bow, J. N., & Quinnell, M. S. (2001). Psychologists’ current practices and procedures in child custody evaluations: Five years after the American Psychological Association guidelines. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32(3), 261-268.
9. California Rules of Court. (2003). Uniform standards of practice for court-ordered child custody evaluations. Retrieved May 7, 2003
10. Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists. (1991). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychologists. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 655-665.
11. Galatzer-Levy, R. M., & Kraus, L. (1999). The scientific basis of child custody decisions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
12. Gould, J. W. (1998). Conducting scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Greenberg, L. R., & Gould, J. W. (2001). Merging paradigms: Clinical treatment in a forensic context. Professional Psychology: Research and practice, 32(5), 469-478.
14. Greenberg, S. A., & Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research & Practice, 28(1), 50-57.
15. Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
16. Heilbrun, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic.
17. Kuehnle, K. (1998). Child sexual abuse evaluations: The scientist-practitioner model. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 5-20.
18. Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. New York: Guilford.
19. New Jersey State Board of Psychological Examiners. (1993). Specialty guidelines for psychologists custody/visitation evaluations. Newark, NJ: New Jersey Department of Law & Public Safety.
20. North Carolina Psychological Association. (1994). Child custody guidelines. Raleigh, NC: Author.
21. Otto, R. K., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., & Edens, J. F. (2003). Child custody evaluation. In A. M. Goldstein & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology. Volume 11 Forensic Psychology (pp. 179-208). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Pear, R. (2002, November 30). Legal group urges states to update their family law. New York Times, p. A1.
23. Schacht, T. E. (2000). Prevention strategies to protect professionals and families involved in high-conflict divorce. University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review, 22(3), 565-592.
24. Skafte, D. (1985). Child custody evaluations: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Stahl, P.M. (1999). Complex issues in child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Strasburger, L., Gutheil, T. G., & Brodsky, A. (1997). On wearing two hats: Role conflict in serving as both psychotherapist and expert witness. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154 (4), 448-456.
27. World Publishing Company. (1971). Webster’s new twentieth century dictionary (2nd Ed.). Cleveland, OH: Author.