A tutorial overview of anomaly detection in hyperspectral images

IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine

Volumn 25, Issue 7 PART 2, 2010, Pages 5-27

  Matteoli, Stefania ^a   Diani, Marco ^a   Corsini, Giovanni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM IMPLEMENTATION; ALGORITHM OPTIMIZATION; ANOMALY DETECTION; ANOMALY DETECTOR; ELECTRO-OPTICAL SYSTEMS; GEOMETRIC CONCEPTS; HYPER-SPECTRAL IMAGES; HYPERSPECTRAL; PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATION; RESEARCH TOPICS; RESEARCH TRENDS; STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK; STATISTICAL MODELS; SURVEILLANCE APPLICATIONS;

DETECTORS;

REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

EID: 77955682014     PISSN: 08858985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MAES.2010.5546306     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Acito, N., Corsini, G., Diani, M., and Cini, A. Experimental performance analysis of hyperspectral anomaly detectors. In Proceedings of SPlE, vol.SS73, 2004, 41 -S1.
2. Acito, N., Corsini, G., and Diani, M. Adaptive detection algorithm for full-pixel targets in hyperspectral images. lEE Proceedings of Visual Image Signal Processing, 152, 6 (2008), 73 1-740.
3. Acito, N., Corsini, G., Diani, M., and Greco, M. Reducing computational complexity in hyperspectral anomaly detection: A feature level fusion approach. In Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2006, 1804-1807.
4. Ashton, E. A. Detection of subpixel anomalies in mUltispectral infrared imagery using an adaptive Bayesian classifier. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36, 2 (1998), S06-S17.
5. Banerjee, A., Burlina, P., and Diehl, C. A support vector method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44, 8(2006), 2282-229 1.
6. Banerjee, A., Burlina, P., and Meth, R. Fast hyperspectral anomaly detection via SVDD. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP 2007), vol.4, 2007, 101 - 1 04.
7. Bowles, J., Chen, W. , and Gillis, D. ORA SIS framework-benefits to working within the linear mixing model. In Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol.1 , 2003 , 96-98.
8. Burges, C. J. C. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2 (1998), 1 2 1 - 167.
9. Carlotto, M. J. A cluster-based approach for detecting man-made objects and changes in imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 2 (2008), 374-387.
10. Chang, C-I., and Chiang, S-S. Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40, 6 (2002), 13 14-132S.
11. Chang, C-I., and Du, Q. Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42, 3 (2004), 608-6 19.
12. Chang, C-I. Orthogonal subspace projection (OSP) revisited: A comprehensive study and analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 433 (2008), S02-S18
13. Chen, J. Y., and Reed, I. S. A detection algorithm for optical targets in clutter. IEEE Transactions on A erospace and Electronic Systems, 23, 1 (1987), 394-40S.
14. Chen, M., Kanade, T., Rowley, H., and Pomerleau, D. Anomaly detection through registration. Pattern Recognition, 32, I (1999), 113- 1 28.
15. Chiang, S-S., Chang, C-I., and Ginsberg, I. W. Unsupervised target detection in hyperspectral images using projection pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39, 7 (200 1 ), 13 80- 139 1.
16. Clare, P., Bernhardt, M., Oxford, w., Murphy, S., Godfree, P., and Wilkinson, V. A new approach to anomaly detection in hyperspectral images. In Proceedings of SPlE, vol.5093 , 2003 , 17-28.
17. Cremers, D., Kohlberg, T., and Schnorr, C. Shape statistics in kernel space for variational image segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 36 (2003), 1929- 1943.
18. Davies, D., and Bouldin, D. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1, 2 (1979), 224-227.
19. Denning, D. E. An intrusion detection model. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 13, 2 (1987), 222-232.
20. Du, Q., and Kopriva, I. Automated target detection and discrimination using constrained kurtosis maximization. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5, I (2008), 3 8-42.
21. Duda, R. 0., Hart, P. E., and Stork, D. G. Pattern Recognition (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Interscience, 2000, 117- 1 2 1.
22. Duran, O., and Petrou, M. A time-efficient clustering method for pure class selection. In Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol.1 , 2005, 510-513.
23. Duran, O., and Petrou, M. A time-efficient method for anomaly detection in hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1 2 (2007), 3 894-3904.
24. Duran, O., Petrou, M., Hathaway, D., and Nothard, I. Anomaly detection through adaptive background class extraction from dynamic hyperspectral data. In Proceedings of IEEE Nordic Signal Processing Conference, 2006, 234-237.
25. Genton, M. G. Classes of kernels for machine learning: A statistic perspective. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2 (200 1 ), 299-3 1 2.
26. Goldberg, H., Kwon, H., and Nasrabadi, N. M. Kernel eigenspace separation transform for subspace anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 4, 4 (2007), 581-585.
27. Goldberg, H., and Nasrabadi, N. M. A comparative study of linear and nonlinear anomaly detectors for hyperspectral imagery. In Proceedings of SPlE, vol.6565 , 2007 , 656504- 1 - 17.
28. Goode, A., et al. Distributed online anomaly detection in high-content screening. In Proceedings of IEEE 5th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2008, 249-252.
29. Harsanyi, I. c., and Chang, C-I. Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: An orthogonal subspace projection approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32, 4 (1994), 779-785.
30. Hayton, P., Tarassenko, L., Scholkopf, B., and Anuzis, P. Support vector novelty detection applied to jet engine vibration spectra, Advances in neural information processing systemS13. I n Proceedings of the 2000 Conference, 200 1 , 946-952.
31. Hazel, G. H. Multivariate Gaussian MRF for multispectral scene segmentation and anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38, 3 (2000), 1199- 1 2 11.
32. Healey, G., and Slater, D. Models and methods for automated material identification in hyperspectral imagery acquired under unknown illumination and atmospheric conditions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37, I I (1999), 2706-2717.
33. Huber, P. J. Projection pursuit. Annals on Statistics, 13, 2 (1985), 435-475.
34. Hunt, B. R., and Cannon, T. M. Nonstationary assumptions of Gaussian models of images. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 6 (1976), 876-881.
35. Hytla, P., Hardie, R. C., Eismann, M. T., and Meola, I. Anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery: A comparison of methods using seasonal data. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol.6565 , 2007, 656506- 1 - 11.
36. Hyviirinen, A., and Oja, E. Independent component analysis : Algorithms and applications. Neural Networks, 13, 4-5 (2000), 411-430. (Pubitemid 30447427)
37. Ifarraguerri, A., and Chang, C-1. Unsupervised hyperspectral image analysis with projection pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38, 6 (2000), 2529-2538.
38. Kay, S. M. Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection Theory. Upper Saddle River, NI: Prentice-Hall, 1998.
39. Kelly, E. I. An adaptive detection algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 22 (1986), 115- 127.
40. Kwon, H., Der, S. Z., and Nasrabadi, N. M. Adaptive anomaly detection using subspace separation for hyperspectral imagery. Optical Engineering, 42, 11 (2003), 3342-335 1.
41. Kwon, H., and Nasrabadi, N. M. Kernel RX-algorithm: A nonlinear anomaly detector for hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 2 (2005), 388-397.
42. Kyrgyzov, I. 0., Kyrgyzov, O. 0., Maitre, H., and Campedel, M. Kernel MDL to determine the number of clusters. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4571 (2007), 203-2 17.
43. Lazarevic, A., Ertoz, L., Kumar, v. , Ozgur, A., and Srivastava, J. A comparative study of anomaly detection schemes in network intrusion detection. In Proceedings of the Third SIAM Conference on Data Mining, 2003.
44. Lee, W-H., Gader, P. D., and Wilson, J. N. Optimizing the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve with application to landmine detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 2 (2007), 3 89-397.
45. Levy, A., and Lindenbaum, M. Sequential-Karhunen-Loeve basis extraction and its application to images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 9, 8(2000), 1371 - 1374.
46. Lo, E., and Ingram, J. Hyperspectral anomaly detection based on minimum generalized variance method. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol.6966, 2008, 696603 - 1-7.
47. Manolakis, D., Marden, D., Kerekes, J., and Shaw, G. On the statistics of hyperspectral imaging data. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol.4381 , 200 1 , 308-3 16.
48. Manolakis, D., and Marden, D. Non Gaussian models for hyperspectral algorithm design and assessment. In Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, vol.3, 2002, 1664- 1666.
49. Manolakis, D., Marden, D., and Shaw, G. A. Hyperspectral image processing for automatic target detection applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 14, I (2003), 79- 116.
50. Manolakis, D., and Shaw, G. Detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, (2002), 29-43.
51. Manolakis, D. Taxonomy of detection algorithms for hyperspectral imaging applications. Optical Engineering, 44, 6 (2005), 066403- 1-11.
52. Marden, D., and Manolakis, D. Modeling hyperspectral imaging data. In Proceedings of SPlE, vol.5093 , 2003, 253-262.
53. Margalit, A., Reed, I. S., and Gagliardi, R. M. Adaptive optical target detection using correlated images. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 21, 3 (1985), 46-59.
54. Masson, P., and Pieczynski, W. SEM algorithm and unsupervised statistical segmentation of satellite images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 31, 3 (1993), 6 18-633.
55. Matteoli, S. , Carnesecchi, F., Diani, M., Corsini, G., and Chiarantini, L. Comparative analysis of hyperspectral anomaly detection strategies on a new high spatial and spectral resolution data set. In Proceedings of SPlE, vol.6748, 2007, 6748.
56. McKenzie, P., and Alder, M. Selecting the optimal number of components for a Gaussian mixture model. In Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Iriformation Theory, 1994, 393.
57. Nascimento, J. M. P., and Bioucas Dias, J. M. Vertex component analysis: A fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 4 (2005), 898-909.
58. Nasrabadi, N. M. Penalized spectral matched filter for target detection in hyperspectral imagery. In Proceedings of IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2007, 4830-4833
59. Parzen, E. On the estimation of a probability density function and mode. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33 (1962), 1065-1076.
60. Penn, B. Using self-organizing maps for anomaly detection in hyperspectral imagery. In Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, vol.3 , 2002, 15 3 1 - 1535.
61. Rakotomamonjy, A. Optimizing AUC with support vector machine (SVM). In Proceedings of European Conference on A rtificial Intelligence, Workshop on ROC Analysis in AI, Valencia, Spain, 2004.
62. Ranney, K. I. and Soumekh, M. Hyperspectral anomaly detection within the signal subspace. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 3, 3 (2006), 3 1 2-3 16. (Pubitemid 44150314)
63. Reed, I. S., and Yu, X. Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 38, 10 (1990), 1760- 1770.
64. Richards, J. A., and Jia, X. Remote Sensing Digital Image Processing. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.
65. Rissanen, J. Universal coding, information, prediction, and estimation. IEEE Transactions on Iriformation Theory, 30, 4 (1984), 629-636.
66. Ruiz A., and Lopez-de Teruel, E. Nonlinear kernel-based statistical pattern analysis. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 12, 1 (200 1 ), 16-32.
67. Scholkopf, B., Platt, J. c., Shawe-Taylor, J., Smola, A. J., and Williamson, R. C. Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural Computation, 13 (200 1 ), 1443- 1471.
68. Scholkopf, B., and Smola, A. J. Learning with kernels: Support vector machines. Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 200 1. Also available at http://www.learning-with-kernels.orgl.
69. Schweizer, S. M., and Moura, J. M. F. Hyperspectral Imagery: Clutter Adaptation in Anomaly Detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46, 5 (2000), 1855-1871.
70. Schweizer, S. M., and Moura, J. M. F. Efficient detection in hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 10, 4 (200 1 ), 5 84-597.
71. Song, X., Jermaine, c., and Ranka, S. Conditional anomaly detection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 19, 5 (2007), 63 1-645.
72. Stein, D. W. J., Beaven, S. G., Hoff, L. E., Winter, E. M., Schaum, A. P., and Stocker, A. D. Anomaly detectio from hyperspectral imagery. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 19, 1 (2002), 5 8-69.
73. Stellman, C. M., Hazel, G. G., Bucholtz, F., and Michalowicz, J. V. Real-time hyperspectral detection and cuing. Optical Engineering, 39, 7 (2000), 1928- 193 5.
74. Stoica, P., and Selen, Y. Model-order selection: A review of information criterion rules. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 21, 4 (2004), 36-47.
75. Suen, P-H., Healey, G., and Slater, D. The impact of viewing geometry on material discriminability in hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39, 7 (200 1 ), 352-358.
76. Tarassenko, L., Hayton, P., Cerneaz, N., and Brady, M. Novelty detection for identification of masses in mammograms. In Proceedings of lEE Fourth International Coriference on Artificial Neural Networks, 1995, 442-447.
77. Tax, D. M. J., and Duin, R. P. W. Support vector domain description. Pattern Recognition Letters, 20 (1999), 119 1 -1199.
78. Tax, D. M. J., and Duin, R. P. W. Support vector data description. Machine Learning, 54, 1 (2004), 45-66.
79. Therrien, C. V. Discrete Random Signals and Statistical Signal Processing. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
80. Torrieri, D. The eigen space transform for neural-network classifiers. Neural Networks, 12 (1999), 419-427
81. Winter, M. E. Fast autonomous spectral endmember determination in hyperspectral data. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Applied Geologic Remote Sensing, vol.2, 1999, 337-344.
82. Winter, M. E. Comparison of approaches for determining end-members in hyperspectral data. In Proceedings of IEEE A erospace Conference, vol.3 , 2000, 305-3 13.
83. Xie, X. L., and Beni, G. A validity measure for fuzzy clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis Machine Intelligence, 13, 8(199 1 ), 841-847.
84. Yeung, K. Y., Fraley, C., Murua, A., Rafery, A. E., and Ruzzo, W. L. Model-based clustering and data transformations for gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 17, 10 (200 1 ), 977-987.