Biomechanics of short hip endoprostheses - The risk of bone failure increases with decreasing implant size

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 666-674

  Bishop, Nicholas E ^a   Burton, Andrew ^b   Maheson, Marci ^c   Morlock, Michael M ^a  

^a HAMBURG UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b Johnson Johnson Company   (United Kingdom)

^c BRISTOL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone fracture; Experiment; Hip prosthesis; Metaphyseal; Model

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL MODEL; BONE FAILURES; BONE FRACTURE; BONE QUALITY; ENDOPROSTHESES; ENDOPROSTHESIS; EXTREME CASE; FEMORAL HIP IMPLANTS; IMPLANT DESIGN; IMPLANT LENGTHS; LOAD CAPACITY; METAPHYSEAL; UNCEMENTED;

BIOMECHANICS; FRACTURE; HIP PROSTHESES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROSTHETICS;

BONE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE BOWING; BONE STRESS; CADAVER; CASE REPORT; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FEMUR OSTEOTOMY; GEOMETRY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE; VALIDATION STUDY; VARUS KNEE; WALKING AID; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 77955653751     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. A. Alho, O. Soreide, and A.J. Bjersand Mechanical factors in loosening of Christiansen and Charnley arthroplasties Acta Orthop. Scand. 55 1984 261 266
2. G. Bergmann, G. Deuretzbacher, M. Heller, F. Graichen, A. Rohlmann, and J. Strauss Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities J. Biomech. 34 2001 859 871
3. G. Bergmann, F. Graichen, and A. Rohlmann Hip joint contact forces during stumbling Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 389 2004 53 59
4. B. Birkenhauer, H. Kistmacher, and J. Ries Conception and first results of the Spiron cementless femoral neck screw prosthesis Orthopade 33 2004 1259 1266
5. S.A. Ender, A. Machner, G. Pap, J. Hubbe, H. Grashoff, and H.W. Neumann Cementless CUT femoral neck prosthesis: increased rate of aseptic loosening after 5 years Acta Orthop. 78 2007 616 621
6. f. Falez, g. Panegrossi, f. Favetti, and c. Barresi Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems J. Orthop. Traumatol. 9 2008 49 54
7. A. Fottner, F. Mazoochian, W. Plitz, P.C. Schulze, C. Birkenmaier, and V. Jansson The bending rod prosthesis: an experimental approach to metaphyseal hip arthroplasty Biomed. Tech. (Berl) 52 2007 346 350
8. J.A. Grant, N.E. Bishop, N. Gotzen, C. Sprecher, M. Honl, and M.M. Morlock Artificial composite bone as a model of human trabecular bone: the implant-bone interface J. Biomech. 40 2007 1158 1164
9. R. Huiskes Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement. Analyses of stresses and heat conduction in bone-prosthesis structures Acta Orthop. Scand. 1980 185:1 208 (Suppl)
10. B.A. Ishaque, J. Gils, S. Wienbeck, E. Donle, E. Basad, and H. Sturz (TPP) versus ESKA cut prosthesis] Z. Orthop. Unfall. 147 2009 79 88
11. E. Jakubowitz, J.B. Seeger, C. Lee, C. Heisel, J.P. Kretzer, and M.N. Thomsen Do short-stemmed-prostheses induce periprosthetic fractures earlier than standard hip stems? A biomechanical ex-vivo study of two different stem designs Arch. Orthop. Trauma. Surg. 2008
12. M.G. Joshi, S.G. Advani, F. Miller, and M.H. Santare Analysis of a femoral hip prosthesis designed to reduce stress shielding J. Biomech. 33 2000 1655 1662
13. J. Kärrholm, G. Garellick, C. Rogmark, and P. Herberts Swedish hip arthroplasty register - Annual report 2007 2008
14. J.H. Kuiper, and R. Huiskes Friction and stem stiffness affect dynamic interface motion in total hip replacement J. Orthop. Res. 14 1996 36 43
15. I.D. Learmonth Total hip replacement and the law of diminishing returns J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 88 2006 1664 1673
16. Maquet Biomechanics of the hip Biomechanics of the hip 1985 Springer Verlag Berlin
17. R.W. McCalden, J.A. McGeough, and C.M. Court-Brown Age-related changes in the compressive strength of cancellous bone. The relative importance of changes in density and trabecular architecture J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 79 1997 421 427
18. M.M. Morlock, N. Bishop, J. Zustin, M. Hahn, W. Ruther, and M. Amling Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90 Suppl 3 2008 89 95
19. B.F. Morrey, R.A. Adams, and M. Kessler A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 82 2000 952 958
20. E. Munting, and M. Verhelpen Fixation and effect on bone strain pattern of a stemless hip prosthesis J. Biomech. 28 1995 949 961
21. E. Munting, P. Smitz, S.N. Van, D.C. Nagant de, A. Vincent, and J.P. Devogelaer Effect of a stemless femoral implant for total hip arthroplasty on the bone mineral density of the proximal femur. A prospective longitudinal study J. Arthroplasty 12 1997 373 379
22. Pauwels The fracture of the femoral neck. A mechanical problem Biomechanics of the locomotor apparatus 1980 Springer-Verlag Berlin
23. N.A. Ramaniraka, L.R. Rakotomanana, P.J. Rubin, and P. Leyvraz Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice Appar. Mot. 86 2000 590 597
24. C.J. Richards, D. Giannitsios, O.L. Huk, D.J. Zukor, T. Steffen, and J. Antoniou Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90 Suppl 3 2008 96 101
25. Schlegel, U.J., Rothstock, S., Siewe, J., Schiwy-Bochat, K.H., Eysel, P., Morlock, M.M., in press. Does impaction matter in hip resurfacing? A cadaveric study. J. Arthroplasty. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2010.01.108.
26. E. Steinhauser, M. Ellenrieder, G. Gruber, R. Busch, R. Gradinger, and W. Mittelmeier Influence on load transfer of different femoral neck endoprostheses Z. Orthop. Ihre Grenzgeb. 144 2006 386 393
27. C. Stukenborg-Colsman Femoral neck prostheses Orthopade 36 2007 347 352
28. K.E. Tanner, A.L. Yettram, M. Loeffler, W.D. Goodier, M.A. Freeman, and W. Bonfield Is stem length important in uncemented endoprostheses?18 Med. Eng. Phys. 17 1995 291 296
29. M. Taylor, and K.E. Tanner Fatigue failure of cancellous bone: a possible cause of implant migration and loosening J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 79 1997 181 182
30. M. Taylor, K.E. Tanner, M.A. Freeman, and A.L. Yettram Cancellous bone stresses surrounding the femoral component of a hip prosthesis: an elastic-plastic finite element analysis Med. Eng. Phys. 17 1995 544 550
31. W. Thomas, L. Lucente, N. Mantegna, and H. Grundei ESKA (CUT) endoprosthesis Orthopade 33 2004 1243 1248
32. H. Weinans, R. Huiskes, and H.J. Grootenboer Quantitative analysis of bone reactions to relative motions at implant-bone interfaces J. Biomech. 26 1993 1271 1281
33. F.M. Westphal, N. Bishop, M. Honl, E. Hille, K. Puschel, and M.M. Morlock Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis - a biomechanical in vitro study Clin. Biomech. 21 2006 834 840
34. F.M. Westphal, N. Bishop, K. Puschel, and M.M. Morlock Biomechanics of a new short-stemmed uncemented hip prosthesis: An in-vitro study in human bone Hip Int. 16 Suppl 3 2006 22 30
35. G. Wieners, M. Pech, F. Streitparth, V. Jansson, and W. Plitz Photoelastic stress analysis of human femurs before and after implantation of different models of femur neck prostheses Z. Orthop. Ihre Grenzgeb. 145 2007 81 87