Influence on load transfer of different femoral neck endoprostheses;Die lastübertragung verschiedener schenkelhalsendoprothesen auf das femur

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 144, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 386-393

  Steinhauser, Erwin ^a   Ellenrieder, M ^b   Gruber, C ^c   Busch, R ^d   Gradinger, R ^a   Mittelmeier, W ^e  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b BG UNFALLKLINIK MURNAU   (Germany)

^c ATOS KLINIK HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ROSTOCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Femoral neck endoprostheses; Photostress analysis; Stress shielding; Total hip replacement

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE MARROW CELL; BONE STRESS; CORTICAL BONE; ENDOPROSTHESIS; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMUR NECK; HIP; LOADING TEST; OSTEOLYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WALKING; WEIGHT BEARING;

CEMENTATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMUR HEAD; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 33749575855     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-942127     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement. A review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160000 cases. Acta Othop Scand 2000; 71: 111-121
2. th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Dallas, USA, Feb. 13-17, 2002; 1-16
3. Huggler AH, Jacob HAC. A new approach towards hip-prosthesis design. Arch Orthop Traumat Surg 1980; 97: 141-144
4. Scholz J, Grundei H. Die ESKA-Schenkelhalsprothese - eine Alternative zur Standardendoprothese des Hüftgelenkes für Patienten in jüngerem Lebensalter. Biomed Tech 1996; 41: 347-350
5. Thomas W, Grundei H. Die ESKA-Schenkelhalsendoprothese zur inneren Fixation Cut. Orthop Praxis 1999; 10: 646-652
6. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, Toni A. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomech 1996; 29: 525-535
7. Heiner AD, Brown TD. Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias. J Biomech 2001; 34: 773-781
8. Glisson RR, Musgrave DS, Graham RD, Vail TP. Validity of photoelastic strain measurement on cadaveric proximal femora. J Biomech Eng 2000; 122: 423-429
9. Zhou XM, Walker PS, Robertson DD. Effect of press-fit femoral stems on strains in the femur. A photoelastic coating study. J Arthroplasty 1990; 5: 71-82
10. Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech 1993; 26: 969-990
11. Huggler AH. The Thrust Plate Prosthesis: A new experience in hip surgery. In: Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (eds). The Thrust Plate Hip Prosthesis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1997; 1-24
12. Jacob HAC, Huggler AH. Die Druckscheiben-Hüftprothese (DSP) - Biomechanische Prinzipien und bisherige klinische Resultate. Med Orth Tech 1996; 116: 157-162
13. Huggler AH, Jacob HAC, Bereiter H, Haferkorn M, Ryf CH, Schenk R. Long-term results with the uncemented thrust plate prosthesis. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 1993; 59 (Suppl 1): 215-223
14. Jacob HAC. Biomechanical principles and design details of the thrust plate prosthesis. In: Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (eds). The Thrust Plate Hip Prosthesis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1997; 25-47
15. Mittelmeier W, Grunwald I, Schäfer R, Grundei H, Gradinger R. Zementlose Endoprothesenverankerung mittels trabekulären, dreidimensional interkonnektierenden Oberflächenstrukturen. Orthopäde 1997; 26: 117-124
16. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M. In vitro stress shielding measurements can be affected by large errors. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14: 215-219
17. Cristofolini L. A Critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 1997; 25: 409-483
18. Duda GN, Heller M, Albinger J, Schulz O, Schneider E, Claes L. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J Biomech 1998; 31: 841-846
19. Finlay JB, Chess DG, Hardie R, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. An evaluation of three loading configurations for the in vitro testing of femoral strains in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1997; 9: 749-759
20. Hua J, Walker PS. Closeness of fit of uncemented stems improves the strain distribution in the femur. J Orthop Res 1995; 13: 339-346
21. Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Strain distribution in the proximal human femur. An in vitro comparison in the intact femur and after insertion of reference and experimental femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001; 83: 295-301
22. Otani T, Whiteside LA, White SE. Strain distribution in the proximal femur with flexible composite and metallic femoral components under axial and torsional loads. J Biomed Mat Res 1993; 27: 575-585
23. Vail TP, Glisson RR, Koukoubis TD, Guilak F. The effect of hip stem material modulus on surface strain in human femora. J Biomech 1998; 31: 619-628
24. Huggler AH, Seemann PS. Die Druckscheibenprothese im siebten Jahr ihrer klinischen Anwendung. Auswertung und Resultate. In: Draenert K, Rütt A (Hrsg). Beiträge zur Implantatverankerung, Art and Science, München 1987; 171-184
25. Bereiter H, Bürgi M, Schenk R. Finite element investigations of the proximal femur after implantation of the thrust plate prosthesis compared with findings in a post-mortem histological specimen and in follow-up examinations. In: Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (eds). The Thrust Plate Hip Prosthesis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1997; 48-62
26. Isaque BA, Wienbeck S, Stürz H. Mittelfristige Ergebnisse und Wechseloperationen nach Druckscheibenendoprothese (DSP). Z Orthop 2004; 142: 25-32
27. Menge M. Bone remodelling of the proximal femur after implantation of a thrust plate prosthesis. In: Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (eds). The Thrust Plate Hip Prosthesis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1997; 98-106
28. Schenk RK, Hauser R, Huggler AH, Jacob HAC. Histology of the thrust plate-bone interface. In: Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (eds). The Thrust Plate Hip Prosthesis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1997; 63-73
29. Isaque BA, Wienbeck S, Basad E, Stürz H. Radiologische Verlaufsanalyse der Druckscheibenendoprothese (DSP). Z Orthop 2004; 142: 15-27
30. Fink B, Schneider T, Conrad S, Jaeger M, Protzen M, Rüther W. The thrust plate prosthesis in patients with aseptic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2002; 122: 499-505
31. Scholz J. Persönliche Kommunikation.
32. Koebke J, Xepulias P, Thomas W. Schenkelhalsprothese Typ Cut - eine funktionell-morphologische Analyse. Biomed Technik 2000; 45: 135-140
33. Gruber G, Stürz H. The limits of indications for the Thrust Plate Prosthesis. In: Huggler AH, Jacob HAC (eds). The Thrust Plate Hip Prosthesis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1997; 119-127