Distributive justice beliefs and group idea generation: Does a belief in equity facilitate productivity?

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 836-840

  Goncalo, Jack A ^a   Kim, Sharon H ^a  

^a and History   (United States)

Author keywords

Distributive justice; Equity equality; Group idea generation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955585892     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams J.S. Toward an understanding of inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1963, 67:422-436.
2. Adams J.S. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology 1965, Vol. 2:267-299. Academic Press, New York.
3. Amabile T.M. The effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37(2):221-233.
4. Baron R.M., Kenny D.A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 51:1173-1182.
5. Beersma B., De Dreu C.K.W. Conflict's consequences: Effects of social motives on Post-negotiation creative and convergent group functioning and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2005, 89:358-374.
6. Bliese P.D. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions 2000, 349-381. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.).
7. Brewer M.B., Gardner W. Who is this " we" ? Levels of collective identity and self representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1996, 71:83-93.
8. Chen Y., Church A.H. Reward allocation preferences in groups and organizations. The International Journal of Conflict Management 1993, 4(1):25-59.
9. De Dreu C.K.W., Nijstad B.A., Van knippenberg D. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2008, 12:22-49.
10. Deutsch M. Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues 1975, 31:137-149.
11. Deutsch M. Distributive justice, a social psychological perspective 1985, Yale University Press, New Haven.
12. Dugosh K.L., Paulus P.B. Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2005, 41:313-320.
13. Foa U.G., Foa E.B. Societal studies of the mind 1974, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
14. Forster J., Higgins E.T., Idson L.C. Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the " goal looms larger" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 75:1115-1131.
15. Frohlich N. A very short history of distributive justice. Social Justice Research 2007, 20:250-262.
16. Goncalo J.A., Staw B.M. Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2006, 100:96-109.
17. Higgins E.T. Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review 2006, 113:439-460.
18. Kuhn M.H., McPartland T. An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review 1954, 19:69-76.
19. Lepper M.R., Greene D., Nisbett R.E. Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the " over justification" hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1973, 28:129-137.
20. Leung K., Park H. Effects of interactional goal on choice of allocation rule: A cross- national study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1986, 37(1):111-120.
21. Leventhal G.S. Fairness in social relationships. Contemporary topics in social psychology 1976, 211-240. General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ. J.W. Thibaut, J.T. Spence, R.C. Carson (Eds.).
22. Mannix E.A., Neale M.A., Northcraft G.B. Equity, equality, or need? The effects of organizational culture on the allocation of benefits and burdens. Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes 1995, 63:276-286.
23. Markus H.R., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review 1991, 98:224-253.
24. Munkes J., Diehl M. Matching or competition? Performance comparison processes in an idea generation task. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2003, 6:305-320.
25. Osborn A.F. Applied imagination 1957, Scribner, New York.
26. Paulus P.B., Larey T.S., Putman V.L., Leggett K.L., Roland E.J. Social influence process in computer brainstorming. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1996, 18:3-14.
27. Simonton D.K. Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian. Psychological Inquiry 1999, 10:309-328.
28. Singelis T.M. The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1994, 20(5):580-591.
29. Stapel D.A., Koomen W. I, We, and the effects of others on me: How self-construal level moderates social comparison effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 5:766-781.
30. Stroebe W., Diehl M., Abakoumkin G. The illusion of group effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1992, 18(5):643-650.
31. Toubias O. Idea generation, creativity and incentives. Marketing Science 2006, 25(5):411-425.
32. Triandis H.C., Chen X.P., Chan D.K. Scenarios for the measurement of collectivism and individualism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1998, 29:275-289.
33. Triandis H.C., Gelfand M.J. Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74:118-128.