A very short history of distributive justice

Social Justice Research

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 250-262

  Frohlich, Norman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Distributive justice; Framing; Rawls; Redistribution; Safety net; Social welfare

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347240805     PISSN: 08857466     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11211-007-0039-7     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Aristotle. (1952). Great Books of the Western World, Volume 9, Aristotle II, Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.
2. Arrow, K. J. (1977). Extended sympathy and the possibility of social choice. Am. Econ. Rev., 67, 219-225.
3. Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale.
4. Cox, J. C., Sadiraj, K., and Sadiraj, V. (2001). A Theory of Competition and Fairness Without Ineq uity Aversion. Paper presented at the International meetings of the Economics Society of America, Barcelona, Spain, June.
5. Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychol. Rev., 83(2): 85-113.
6. Cruz-Doña, R. dela, and Martina, A. (2000). Diverse groups agreeing on a system of justice and distribution: evidence from the Philippines. J. Interdiscipl. Econ. 11, 35-76.
7. Eckel, C. C., and Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games Econ. Behav., 16, 181-191.
8. Fehr, E., and Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econ., 114, 817-868.
9. Fleischacker, S. (1994). A short history of distributive justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
10. Frohlich, N., and Oppenheimer, J. A. (1992). Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory, Berkeley: University of California Press.
11. Frohlich, N., and Oppenheimer, J. (2006). Justice preferences and the arrow problem" with Joe A. Oppenheimer. Paper presented at the Workshop "Testing Different Theories of Individual Behavior in Social Dilemmas", Max Planck Institute, Jena, Germany, January 12-13.
12. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J., Bond, P., and Boschman, I. (1984). Beyond economic man. J. Confl. Resolut., 28(1): 3-24.
13. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J., and Kurki, A. (2004). Problems in modeling social preferences: insights from modified dictator experiments. Publ Choice, 119, 91-117.
14. Jackson, M., and Hill, P. (1995). A fair share. J. Theor. Polit., 7(2): 69-179.
15. Kahneman D., Knetsch, J. L., Thaler, R. H. (1986) Fairness and the assumptions of economics. In a specially edited volume (by Hogarth, R. M. and Reder, M. W.) of J. Bus., 59, S285-S301.
16. Konow, J. (1996). A positive theory of economic fairness. J. Econ. Behav. Org., 31(1): 15-35.
17. Konow, J. (2000). Fair shares and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. Am. Econ. Rev., 90, 1072-1091.
18. Konow, J. (2001). Fair and square: the four sides of distributive justice. J. Econ. Behav. Org., 46, 137-164.
19. Larrick, R. P., and Blount, S. (1997). The claiming effect: why players are more generous in social dilemmas than in ultimatum games. J. Pers. Social Psychol., 72, 810-825.
20. Michelbach, P. A., Scott, J. T., Mailand, R. E., and Bornstein, B. H. (2003). Doing Rawls justice: an experimental study of income distribution norms. Am. J. Polit. Sci., 47(3): 523-539.
21. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
22. Oleson, P. E. (1997). An Experimental Examination of Alternative Theories of Distributive Justice and Economic Fairness. Paper presented at Public Choice, San Francisco, March.
23. Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev., 83, 1281-1302.
24. Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and economics. J. Econ. Liter., 36, 11-46.
25. Ruffle, B. J. (1998). More is better, but fair is lair: tipping in dictator and ultimatum games. Games Econ. Behav., 23, 247-265.
26. Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
27. Saijo, T., Takahashi, S., and Turnbull, S. (1996). Justice in Income Distribution: An Experimental Approach. Mimeo: Presented at 1996 ISA, San Diego, April 18, 1996.
28. Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philos. Publ. Affairs, 6(4): 317-344.
29. Sen, A. (1983). Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.
30. Sen, A. (2002). The possibility of social choice. In Freedom and Social Choice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, pp. 65-118.
31. Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263-292.
32. Walker, I., and Smith, H. J. (Eds.) (2002). Relative Deprivation; Specification, Development, and Integration. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Wittman, D. (2002). When does altruism overcome the intransitivity of income distribution? In Breton, A. et al. (eds.), Rational Foundations of Democratic Politics. Cambridge University Press.