The role of interface organizations in science communication and understanding

Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 306-313

  Osmond, Deanna L ^a   Nadkarni, Nalini M ^b   Driscoll, Charles T ^c   Andrews, Elaine ^d   Gold, Arthur J ^e   Broussard Allred, Shorna R ^f   Berkowitz, Alan R ^g   Klemens, Michael W ^g   Loecke, Terry L ^g   Ann McGarry, Mary ^h   Schwarz, Kirsten ^g,i   Washington, Mary L ^j   Groffman, Peter M ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EVERGREEN STATE COLLEGE   (United States)

^c Syracuse University   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^f Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^g CARY INSTITUTE OF ECOSYSTEM STUDIES   (United States)

^h PLYMOUTH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j Parks and People Foundation   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY;

EID: 77955576417     PISSN: 15409295     EISSN: 15409309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/090145     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andersson L. 2004. Experiences of the use of riverine nutrient models in stakeholder dialogues, Int J Water Resour D 20: 399-413.
2. Bacic ILZ, Rossiter DG, and Bregt AK. 2006. Using spatial information to improve collective understanding of shared environmental problems at watershed level. Landscape Urban Plan 77: 54-66.
3. Bormann FH and Likens GE. 1979. Pattern and process in a forested ecosystem. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
4. Buck LE, Geisler CC, Schelhas J, and Wollenberg E (Eds). 2001. Biological diversity: balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management. Washington, DC: CRC Press.
5. Cash D, Clark WC, Alcock F, et al. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. P Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 8086-91.
6. Colfer CJP (Ed). 2005. The equitable forest. Diversity, community, and resource management. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future Press.
7. Craps M (Ed). 2003. Social learning in river basin management, WP2 report of the HarmoniCOP project, Brussels, Belgium.
8. Craps M and Maurel P (Eds). 2003. Social learning pool of questions. An instrument to diagnose social learning and IC tools in European river basin management, combined WP2/WP3 report of the HarmoniCOP project, Brussels, Belgium.
9. Craps M and Prins S. 2004. Participation and social learning in the development planning of a Flemish river valley. Case study report produced under work package 5 of the HarmoniCOP project, Brussels, Belgium.
10. Craps M, Dewulf A, Mancero M, et al. 2004. Constructing common ground and re-creating differences between professional and indigenous communities in the Andes. J Community Appl Soc 14: 378-93.
11. Driscoll CT, Lawrence GB, Bulger AJ, et al. 2001. Acid rain revisited: advances in scientific understanding since the passage of the 1970 and 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments. Hanover, NH: Hubbard Brook Research Foundation, Science Links Publication.
12. Driscoll C, Whitall D, Aber J, et al. 2003. Nitrogen pollution: from the sources to the sea. Hanover, NH: Hubbard Brook Research Foundation, Science Links Publication.
13. Driscoll CT, Evers D, Lambert KF, et al. 2007. Mercury matters: linking mercury science with public policy in the Northeastern United States. Hanover, NH: Hubbard Brook Research Foundation, Science Links Publication.
14. Gieryn TF. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science: credibility on the line. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15. Groffman PM, Driscoll CT, Likens GE, et al. 2004. Nor gloom of night: a new conceptual model for the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study. BioScience 54: 139-48.
16. Groffman PM, Stylinski C, Nisbet MC, et al. 2010. Restarting the conversation: challenges at the interface between ecology and society. Front Ecol Environ 8: 284-91.
17. Jeffrey P and Gearey M. 2006. Integrated water resources management: lost on the road from ambition to realization? Water Sci Technol 53:1-8.
18. Likens GE and Bormann FH. 1995. Biogeochemistry of a forested ecosystem. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
19. Lovett GM, Burns DA, Driscoll CT, et al. 2007. Who needs environmental monitoring? Front Ecol Environ 5: 253-60.
20. Maurel P, Craps M, Cemesson F, et al. 2007. Concepts and methods for analysing the role of information and communication tools (IC-tools) in social learning processes for river basin management. Environ Modell Softw 22: 630-39.
21. McCarthy JJ. 2009. Presidents who value science. Science 323: 853.
22. Meffe GK, Nielsen LA, Knight RL, and Schenborn DA. 2002. Ecosystem management. Adaptive, community-based conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
23. Miller J. 2004. Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: what we know and what we need to know. Public Underst Sci 13: 273-94.
24. Nadkarni NM. 2006. The moss-in-prison project: disseminating science beyond academia. Front Ecol Environ 4: 442-43.
25. Nadkarni NM. 2007. Ecological outreach to faith-based communities. Front Ecol Environ 5: 332-33.
26. NSB (National Science Board). 2002. Science and engineering indicators 2002. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
27. Olsson JA and Andersson L. 2007. Possibilities and problems with the use of models as a communication tool in water resource management. Water Resour Manag 21: 97-110.
28. Osmond DL, Ranells NN, Hodges SC, et al. 2001a. Tracking nitrogen loading reductions from agricultural sources: NLEW. In: Steenvoorden J, Claessen F, and Willems J (Eds). Proceedings of the International Conference on Agricultural Effects on Ground and Surface Waters, 1-4 October 2000; Wageningen, The Netherlands. IAHS Publication 273.
29. Osmond DL, Xu L, Ranells NN, et al. 2001b. Nitrogen loss estimation worksheet (NLEW): an agricultural nitrogen loading reduction tracking tool. In: Optimizing nitrogen management in food and energy production and environmental protection: Proceedings of the 2nd International Nitrogen Conference on Science and Policy. Scientific World 1.
30. Priest S. 2009. Reinterpreting the audiences for media messages about science. In: Holliman R, Whitelegg E, Scanlon E, et al. (Eds). Investigating science communication in the information age: implications for public engagement and popular media. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Rinaudo JD and Garin P. 2005. The benefits of combining lay and expert input for water-management planning at the watershed level. Water Policy 7: 279-93.
32. Roth WM, Riecken J, Pozzer-Ardenghi L, et al. 2004. Those who get hurt aren't always being heard: scientist-resident interactions over community water. Sci Technol Hum Val 29: 153-83.
33. Smith TA, Osmond D, and Wendell Gilliam J. 2006. Riparian buffer width and nitrate removal in a lagoon-effluent irrigated agricultural area. J Soil Water Conserv 61: 273-81.
34. Ulrich C and Nadkarni NM. 2009. Sustainability research in enforced residential institutions: collaborations of ecologists and prisoners. Environ Dev Sustainability 11: 815-22.
35. Whiteman L and Nadkarni N. 2009. www.nsf.gov/discoveries/disc-summ.jsp? cntn-id=114311. Viewed 14 Jul 2009.