Concepts and methods for analysing the role of Information and Communication tools (IC-tools) in Social Learning processes for River Basin Management

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 630-639

  Maurel, Pierre ^a   Craps, Marc ^b   Cernesson, Flavie ^a   Raymond, Richard ^a   Valkering, Pieter ^c   Ferrand, Nils ^a  

^a AGROPARISTECH   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

IC tools; Public participation; Social Learning; Water Framework Directive

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL LEARNING; TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE;

RIVER BASIN PROJECTS;

BASIN MANAGEMENT; COMMUNICATION; LEARNING; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; RIVER BASIN;

AQUITAINE; BELGIUM; BENELUX; DORDOGNE; EURASIA; EUROPE; FLANDERS; FRANCE; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33845695876     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Arnstein S. A ladder of citizen participation in the USA. Journal of the American Institute of Planners (1969) 216-224
2. Barraqué, B., Le Bouhris, J.P., Maurel, P., Raymond, R., 2004. Public participation in the Dordogne river basin. Case study report produced under work package 5 of the HarmoniCOP project, Bruxelles, Belgium.
3. Craps, M. (Ed.), 2003. Social Learning in river basin management, WP2 report of the HarmoniCOP project, Bruxelles, Belgium.
4. Craps, M., Maurel, P. (Eds.), 2003. Social Learning Pool of Questions. An instrument to diagnose Social Learning and IC tools in European river basin management, combined WP2/WP3 report of the HarmoniCOP project, Bruxelles, Belgium.
5. Craps, M., Prins, S., 2004. Participation and Social Learning in the development planning of a Flemish river valley. Case study report produced under work package 5 of the HarmoniCOP project, Bruxelles, Belgium.
6. Craps M., Dewulf A., Mancero M., Santos E., and Bouwen R. Constructing common ground and re-creating differences between professional and indigenous communities in the Andes. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 14 (2004) 378-393
7. Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Aarts, N., Lewicki, R., Bouwen, R., van Woerkum, C., 2005. Disentangling approaches to framing: mapping the terrain. Paper Submitted for 18th IACM Conference, Sevilla, Spain.
8. Drafting Group, 2002. Guidance on public participation in relation to the Water Framework Directive - active involvement, consultation, and public access to information. EC report, Bruxelles, Belgium.
9. Faure, A., 2000. Etude de l'impact social des éclusées sur les vallées de la Dordogne, la Cère, la Maronne et la Vézère. EPIDOR report, Bergerac, France.
10. Ferrand N., Cernesson F., and Maurel P. Comparative charting of IC tools usage in Social Learning processes. International Environmental Modelling and Software (iEMSs) Conference (June 14-17, 2004), Osnabrück, Germany
11. Fisker J. Introduction to Communication Studies. second ed. (1990), Routledge, London-New York
12. Lalement R., and Lagarde P. Architecture du Système d'Information sur l'Eau. Livre Vert (2005), Ministère de l'Ecologie et du Développement Durable, Paris, France
13. Legris P., Ingham J., and Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information and Management 40 (2003) 191-204
14. Lewicki R., Gray B., and Elliot M. Making Sense of Intractable Environmental Conflicts (2003), Island Press, Washington
15. Maurel, P. (Ed.), 2003. Public participation and the European Water Framework Directive. Role of information and communication tools, WP3 report of the HarmoniCOP project, Bruxelles, Belgium.
16. Mostert E. The challenge of public participation. Water Policy 5 (2003) 179-197
17. Pahl-Wostl C. Participative and stakeholder-based policy design, evaluation and modeling processes. Integrated Assessment 3 (2002) 3-14
18. Raymond R., Maurel P., Ferrand N., and Barreteau O. Quelles fonctions et quels usages pour les outils d'information géographique dans la gestion durable des hydrosystèmes continentaux?. In: Scarwell H.-J., and Frenchomme M. (Eds). Contraintes environnementales et gouvernance des territoires (2004), Editions de l'Aube: La Tour d'Aigues, France 435-443
19. Star S.L., and Greisemer J.R. Institutional Ecology, "Translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology. Social studies of Science 19 (1989) 387-420
20. Tippet J., Searl B., Pahl-Wostl C., and Rees Y. Social Learning in public participation in river basin management - Early findings from HarmoniCOP European case studies. Environmental Science and Policy vol. 8 (2005), Research and technology integration in support of the European Union Water Framework Directive, Bruxelles, Belgium Special issue, issue 3
21. Ubbels A., and Verhallen J.M. Suitability of Decision Support Tools for Collaborative Planning Processes in Water Resources Management (2000), RIZA: Wageningen University, Netherlands
22. Vinck D., and Jeantet A. Mediating and commissioning objects in the sociotechnical process of product design: a conceptual approach. In: MacLean D., Saviotti P., and Vinck D. (Eds). Management and New Technology: Design, Networks and Strategy. COST Social Science Series (1995) Bruxelles, Belgium
23. Webler T., Tuler S., and Krueger R. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 27 3 (2001) 435-450
24. Wenger E. Communities of practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity (1998), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
25. Woodhill A.J. Dialogue and transboundary water resources management: towards a framework for facilitating Social Learning. In: Langaas S., and Timmerman J.G. (Eds). The Role and Use of Environmental Information in European Transboundary River Basin Management (2004), IWA, London, England
26. Working Group GIS, 2002. Guidance document on implementing the GIS elements of the WFD. EC report: Bruxelles, Belgium.