Using spatial information to improve collective understanding of shared environmental problems at watershed level

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 77, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 54-66

  Bacic, Ivan Luiz Zilli ^a   Rossiter, David G ^b   Bregt, Arnold K ^c  

^a EMPRESA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA E EXTENSÃO RURAL DE SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Demand driven land evaluation; Spatial information; Stakeholders' perception; Visualisation tools; Water pollution

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION SCIENCE; LANDFORMS; VISUALIZATION; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

DEMAND-DRIVEN LAND EVALUATION; DYNAMIC POLLUTION MODEL; SPATIAL INFORMATION; STAKEHOLDERS' PERCEPTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; SPATIAL DATA; STAKEHOLDER; STREAMWATER; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED;

BRAZIL; SANTA CATARINA; SOUTH AMERICA;

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 33747448648     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Al-Kodmany K. Using visualization techniques for enhancing public participation in planning and design: process, implementation, and evaluation. Landscape Urban Planning 45 (1999) 37-45
2. Appleton K., and Lovett A. GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defining 'sufficient' realism for environmental decision-making. Landscape Urban Planning 65 (2003) 117-131
3. Bacic, I.L.Z., 2003. Demand-driven land evaluation: with case studies in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Ph.D. Thesis. Wageningen University and ITC.
4. Bacic I.L.Z., Rossiter D.G., and Bregt A.K. The use of land evaluation information by land use planners and decision-makers: a case study in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Soil Use Manage. 19 (2003) 12-18
5. Backus G.B.C., Eidman V.R., and Dijkhuizen A.A. Farm decision making under risk and uncertainty. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 45 (1997) 307-328
6. Ball J. Towards a methodology for mapping 'regions for sustainability' using PPGIS. Prog. Planning 58 (2002) 81-140
7. Barrera-Bassols N., and Zinck J.A. Ethnopedology: a worldwide view on the soil knowledge of local people. Geoderma 111 (2003) 171-195
8. Barrios E., and Trejo M.T. Implications of local soil knowledge for integrated soil management in Latin America. Geoderma 111 (2003) 217-231
9. Bojórquez-Tapia L.A., Díaz-Mondragon S., and Ezcurra E. GIS-based approach for participatory decision making and land suitability assessment. Int. J. Geographical Information Sci. 15 (2001) 129-151
10. In: Craig W.J., Harris T.M., and Weiner D. (Eds). Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems (2002), Taylor & Francis, London
11. Dartora V., Perdomo C.C., and Tumelero I.L. Manejo de dejetos de suínos. Boletim Informativo Pesquisa e Extensão (1998), EMBRAPA/EMATER, Brasil
12. EMBRAPA, 1999. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos (Rio de Janeiro-RJ). Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Embrapa Produção de Informação, Brasília.
13. Engel B.A., Srinivasan R., Arnold J., Rewerts C., and Brown S.J. Nonpoint source (NPS) pollution modeling using models integrated with geographic information systems (GIS). Water Sci. Technol. 28 (1993) 685-690
14. ERDAS LCC, 2002. ERDAS IMAGE. Release 8.6. ERDAS LCC.
15. FAO/INCRA, 1997. Agricultura familiar na região sul. FAO/INCRA, Brasília.
16. Geertman S. Participatory planning and GIS: a PSS to bridge the gap. Environ. Planning B: Planning Design 29 (2002) 21-35
17. Gimblett R., Daniel T., Cherry S., and Meitner M.J. The simulation and visualisation of complex human-environment interactions. Landscape Urban Planning 54 (2001) 63-78
18. Gonzalez, R.M., 2000. Platforms and Terraces: Bridging participation and GIS in joint-learning for watershed management with the Ifugaos of the Philippines. Ph.D. Thesis (ITC Dissertation 72). Wageningen University.
19. Instituto Cepa/SC, 2001. Diagnóstico rural. Instituto Cepa/SC, Florianópolis.
20. ITC, 2002. ILWIS v.3.2. Academic. The Integrated Land & Water Information System. ITC, Enschede.
21. Mannaerts, C., Dost, R., Lichun, W., 2002. GRIPS - Geo-referenced interface package for the AGNPS v. 5.0 watershed model. ITC, Enschede.
22. Ogao, P.J., 2002. Exploratory visualization of temporal geospatial data using animation. Ph.D. Thesis (ITC Dissertation 89). Utrecht University.
23. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations (1995), Free Press, New York
24. Ryder R. Local soil knowledge and site suitability evaluation in the Dominican Republic. Geoderma 111 (2003) 289-305
25. Silva, L.C., Bortoluzzi, C.A., 1987. Mapa geológico do Estado de Santa Catarina escala 1:500 000: texto explicativo. DNPM - 11o Distrito/Secr. Ciência Tecnologia, Minas e Energia - Coordenadoria de Recursos Minerais, Florianópolis.
26. Simon H.A. The new science of management decision (1977), Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632, New Jersey
27. Tassinari, G., Oliveira, F.T.G., Pola, A.C., 1997. Inventário das terras em microbacias hidrográficas: Rio Ariranhazinho - Seara/SC. EPAGRI - Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina S.A., Florianópolis.
28. In: Tedesco J.C. (Ed). Agricultura familiar: realidades e perspectivas (1999), EDIUPF, Passo Fundo
29. Tress B., and Tress G. Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning - a study from Denmark. Landscape Urban Planning 64 (2003) 161-178
30. USDA, 1999. Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Agriculture Handbook 436. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington DC.
31. Young, R.A., Onstad, C.A., Bosch, D.D., Anderson, W.P., 1987. AGNPS, Agricultural non-point source pollution model: a watershed analysis tool. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Conservation Research Report 35, Washington DC.