Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction

Vision Research

Volumn 40, Issue 28, 2000, Pages 3829-3839

  Whitney, David ^a   Cavanagha, Patrick ^a   Murakami, Ikuya ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

Author keywords

Direction change; Extrapolation; Facilitation; Flash lag; Latency; Motion

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EYE FIXATION; EYE POSITION; FACILITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; ILLUSION; LATENT PERIOD; LUMINANCE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS; VISION;

EID: 0033768966     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00225-X     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Multiple visual latency
2. Visual inertia in apparent motion
3. Extrapolation or attention shift?
4. Models of stimulus uncertainty in motion perception
5. A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination
6. Direction-specific improvement in motion discrimination
7. Vernier acuity with dot test objects
8. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina
9. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect
10. Human velocity and direction discrimination measured with random dot patterns
11. Detection of changes in speed and direction of motion: reaction time analysis
12. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness
13. Recruitment mechanisms in speed and fine-direction discrimination tasks
14. The parallel visual motion inputs into areas V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex
15. Facilitation in ON-OFF directionally selective ganglion cells of the rabbit retina
16. The effects of exposure duration and luminance on the 3-dot hyperacuity task
17. Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli
18. The time it takes to detect changes in speed and direction of visual motion
19. Population receptive fields (PRFs) derived from moving stimuli recorded in cat visual cortex show reduced latencies compared to the stationary condition
20. Extrapolation or attention shift?
21. Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movement. I. Localization and visual properties of neurons
22. Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position
23. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process
24. The position of moving objects
25. The detection of coherence in moving random-dot patterns
26. The independence of channels in human vision selective for direction of movement
27. Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects
28. Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away
29. A constant latency difference determines directional anisotropy in visual motion perception
30. The simple reaction time to changes in direction of visual motion
31. Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception
32. Versuch einer gemeinsamen theorie der phanomene frohlichs und hazelhoffs und kritik ihrer verfahren zur messung der empfindungszeit
33. Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Frohlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation
34. Apparent distance reduction with moving stimuli (Tandem Effect): evidence for an attention-shifting model
35. Temporal and spatial characteristics of the upper displacement limit for motion in random dots
36. Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movement. II. Differentiation of retinal from extraretinal inputs
37. Misalignment of contours through the interaction of apparent and real motion systems.
38. Motion extrapolation in catching
39. Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation
40. Factors influencing velocity coding in the human visual field
41. Effects of stimulus speed on direction discriminations
42. Moving ahead through differential visual latency
43. Dynamic properties of vision - V
44. Extrapolating movement without retinal motion
45. Mental set alters visibility of moving targets
46. Representational development of direction in motion perception: a fragile process
47. How the visual system detects changes in the direction of moving targets
48. Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones
49. The combination of motion signals over time
50. Extension of displacement limits in multiple-exposure sequences of apparent motion
51. Visible persistence is reduced by fixed-trajectory motion but not by random motion
52. Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: the integration of direction information
53. Summation and discrimination of gratings moving in opposite directions
54. Colliding targets: evidence for spatial localization within the motion system
55. Visual acuity in the presence of retinal image motion.
56. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation
57. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli