Spatial facilitation is involved in flash-lag effect

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1655-1661

  Maiche, Alejandro ^a   Budelli, Ruben ^b   Gómez Sena, Leonel ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Differential latencies; Flash lag effect; Horizontal propagation; Motion; Neural processing delays

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FACILITATION; FLASH LAG EFFECT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOPHYSICS; PURSUIT, SMOOTH; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 34247859192     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allman J., Miezin F., and McGuinness E. Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annual Review of Neuroscience 8 (1985) 407-430
2. Baldo M.V., and Klein S.A. Extrapolation or attention shift?. Nature 378 6557 (1995) 565-566
3. Berry II M.J., Brivanlou I.H., Jordan T.A., and Meister M. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 398 6725 (1999) 334-338
4. Bringuier V., Chavane F., Glaeser L., and Fregnac Y. Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. Science 283 5402 (1999) 695-699
5. De Valois R.L., and De Valois K.K. Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors. Vision Research 31 9 (1991) 1619-1626
6. Eagleman D.M., and Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287 5460 (2000) 2036-2038
7. Fitzpatrick D. Seeing beyond the receptive field in primary visual cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 10 4 (2000) 438-443
8. Fregnac Y., Bringuier V., and Chavane F. Synaptic integration fields and associative plasticity of visual cortical cells in vivo. Journal of Physiology Paris 90 5-6 (1996) 367-372
9. Georges S., Series P., Fregnac Y., and Lorenceau J. Orientation dependent modulation of apparent speed: Psychophysical evidence. Vision Research 42 25 (2002) 2757-2772
10. Gilbert C.D., and Wiesel T.N. Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 9 7 (1989) 2432-2442
11. Jancke D., Chavane F., Naaman S., and Grinvald A. Imaging cortical correlates of illusion in early visual cortex. Nature 428 6981 (2004) 423-426
12. Jancke D., Erlhagen W., Schoner G., and Dinse H.R. Shorter latencies for motion trajectories than for flashes in population responses of cat primary visual cortex. Journal of Physiology 556 Pt 3 (2004) 971-982
13. Kersten D., and Yuille A. Bayesian models of object perception. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 13 2 (2003) 150-158
14. Mackay D.M. Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature 181 4607 (1958) 507-508
15. Maiche A., Budelli R., Estaún S., and Gómez-Sena L. Contextual dependence of flash-lag illusion magnitude. Perception 34 Suppl. (2005) 160-161
16. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature 370 6487 (1994) 256-257
17. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10 4 (1997) 437-442
18. Series P., Lorenceau J., and Fregnac Y. The "silent" surround of V1 receptive fields: Theory and experiments. Journal of Physiology Paris 97 4-6 (2003) 453-474
19. Stocker A.A., and Simoncelli E.P. Noise characteristics and prior expectations in human visual speed perception. Nature Neuroscience 9 4 (2006) 578-585
20. Toth L.J., Rao S.C., Kim D.S., Somers D., and Sur M. Subthreshold facilitation and suppression in primary visual cortex revealed by intrinsic signal imaging. Proceedings of the National Academic Sciences of the United States of America 93 18 (1996) 9869-9874
21. Vinje W.E., and Gallant J.L. Natural stimulation of the nonclassical receptive field increases information transmission efficiency in V1. Journal of Neuroscience 22 7 (2002) 2904-2915
22. Whitney D., and Murakami I. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience 1 8 (1998) 656-657