Perceived onset time and position of a moving stimulus

Vision Research

Volumn 43, Issue 15, 2003, Pages 1625-1635

  Kreegipuu, Kairi ^a   Allik, Jüri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Movement onset; Spatio temporal sensitivity; Velocity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEASUREMENT; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0038697751     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00165-2     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allik J., Kreegipuu K. Multiple visual latency. Psychological Science. 9:1998;135-138.
2. Aschersleben G., Müsseler J. Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:1999;1-12.
3. Bachmann T. Twelve spatiotemporal phenomena and one explanation. Aschersleben G., Bachmann T., Müsseler J. Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events. 1999;173-206 Elsevier, Amsterdam.
4. Bachmann T. Microgenetic approach to the conscious mind. 2000;John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
5. Bachmann T., Põder E. Change in feature space is not necessary for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research. 41:2001;1103-1106.
6. Baldo M.V., Klein S.A. Extrapolation or attention shift? Nature. 378:1995;565-566.
7. Baldo M.V.C., Kihara A.H., Namba J., Klein S.A. Evidence for an attentional component of the perceptual misalignment between moving and flashing stimuli. Perception. 31:2002;17-30.
8. Baldo M.V.C., Namba J. The attentional modulation of the flash-lag effect. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 35:2002;969-972.
9. Brenner E., Smeets J.B.J. Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect. Vision Research. 40:2000;1645-1648.
10. Collyer C.E. Discrimination of spatial and temporal intervals defined by three light flashes: effect of spacing on temporal judgements and of timing on spatial judgements. Perception & Psychophysics. 21:1977;357-364.
11. Eagleman D.M. Visual illusions and neurobiology. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2:2001;920-926.
12. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science. 287:2000;2036-2038.
13. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Response to Patel, Ogmen, Bedell and Sampath (2000) [Technical Comments]. Science. 290:2000;1051a.
14. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Response to Krekelberg and Lappe (2000) and Whitney and Cavanagh (2000) [Technical Comments]. Science. 289:2000;1107a.
15. Eagleman D.M., Sejnowski T.J. Untangling spatial from temporal illusions. TRENDS in Neurosciences. 25(June):2002;293.
16. Exner S. Über die eine Gesichtswahrnenehmung nötige Zeit. About the necessary duration of a visual perception Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Matematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Classe. 58:1868;601-632.
17. Freyd J.J., Finke R.A. Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 10:1984;126-132.
18. Fröhlich F.W. Überr die Messung der Empfindungszeit. About the measurement of the sensation time Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie. 54:1923;58-78.
19. Fröhlich F.W. Die Empfindungzeit. The sensation time:1929;Gustav Fischer, Jena.
20. Haddad H. Jr., Carreiro L.R.R., Baldo M.V.C. Modulation of the perception of temporal order by attentional and pre-attentional factors. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research. 35:2002;979-983.
21. Hess C. Untersuchungen über den Erregungsvorgang in Sehorgan bei kurz- und bei längerdauernder Reizung. Studies on the sensation processes in organ of sight for long and short duration stimuli Pflügers Archiv für die gesammte Physiologie des Menchen und Thiere. 101:1904;226-262.
22. Hubbard T.L., Motes M.A. Does representational momentum reflect a distortion of the length or the endpoint of a trajectory? Cognition. 83:2002;B89-B99.
23. Jones B., Huang Y.L. Space-time dependencies in psychophysical judgement of extent and duration: algebraic models of the tau and kappa effects. Psychological Bulletin. 91:1982;128-142.
24. Kerzel D. A matter of design: no representational momentum without predictability. Visual Cognition. 9:2002;66-80.
25. Kerzel D., Müsseler J. Effects of stimulus material on the Fröhlich illusion. Vision Research. 42:2002;181-189.
26. Khurana B., Nijhawan R. Extrapolation or attention shift? (Replay to Baldo and Klein). Nature. 378:1995;566.
27. Khurana B., Watanabe K., Nijhawan R. The role of attention in motion extrapolation: are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed? Perception. 29:2000;675-692.
28. Kirschfeld K., Kammer T. The Fröhlich effect: a consequence of the interaction of visual focal attention and metacontrast. Vision Research. 39:1999;3702-3709.
29. Kirschfeld K., Kammer T. Visual attention and metacontrast modify latency to perception in opposite directions. Vision Research. 40:2000;1027-1033.
30. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. Temporal recruitment along the trajectory of moving objects and the perception of position. Vision Research. 39:1999;2669-2679.
31. Krekelberg B., Lappe M. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Research. 40:2000;201-215.
32. Lappe M., Krekelberg B. The position of moving objects. Perception. 27:1998;1437-1449.
33. MacKay D.M. Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects. Nature. 181:1958;507-508.
34. Marr D. Vision. A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. 1982;W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.
35. Mashhour M. The psychophysical relations in the perception of velocity. Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis:1964;Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.
36. Mateeff S., Bohdanecky Z., Hohnsbein J., Ehrenstein W.H., Yakimoff N. A constant latency difference determines directional anisotropy in visual motion perception. Visual Research. 31:1991;2235-2237.
37. Mateeff S., Yakimoff N., Hohnsbein J., Ehrenstein W.H., Bohdanecky Z., Radil T. Selective directional sensitivity in visual motion perception. Vision Research. 31:1991;131-138.
38. Müsseler J., Aschersleben G. Localizing the first position of a moving stimulus: the Fröhlich effect and an attention-shifting explanation. Perception & Psychophysics. 60:1998;683-695.
39. Müsseler J., Stork S., Kerzel D. Comparing mislocalizations with moving stimuli: the Fröhlich effect, the flash-lag, and representational momentum. Visual Cognition. 9:2002;120-138.
40. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature. 370:1994;256-257.
41. Nijhawan R. Visual decomposition of colour trough motion extrapolation. Nature. 386:1997;66-69.
42. Nijhawan R. The flash-lag phenomenon: object motion and eye movements. Perception. 30:2001;263-282.
43. Nishida S., Johnston A. Marker correspondence, not processing latency, determines temporal binding of visual attributes. Current Biology. 12:2002;359-368.
44. Patel S.S., Ogmen H., Bedell E., Sampath V. Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction [Technical Comment]. Science. 290:2000;1050-1051a.
45. Posner M. Attention in cognitive neuroscience: an overview. Cazzaniga M.S. The cognitive neurosciences. 1995;615-624 The MIT Press, Cambridge.
46. Purushothaman G., Patel S.S., Bedell H.E., Ogmen H. Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature. 396:1998;424.
47. Schlag J., Schlag-Rey M. Through the eye slowly: delays and localization errors in the visual system. Nature Reviews. 3:2002;191-199.
48. Sheth B.R., Nijhawan R., Shimojo S. Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nature Neuroscience. 3:2000;489-495.
49. Shore D.I., Spence C., Klein R.M. Visual prior entry. Psychological Science. 12:2001;205-212.
50. Thornton I.M. The onset repulsion effect. Spatial Vision. 15:2002;219-243.
51. Titchener E.B. Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. 1908;Macmillan, New York.
52. Watt R.J., Morgan M.J., Ward R.M. Stimulus features that determine the visual location of a bright bar. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 24(1):1983;66-71.
53. Westheimer G., McKee S. Integration regions for visual hyperacuity. Vision Research. 17:1977;89-93.
54. Whitney D., Cavanagh P. The position of moving objects [Technical Comment]. Science. 289:2000;1107a.
55. Whitney D., Cavanagh P., Murakami I. Temporal facilitation for moving stimuli is independent of changes in direction. Vision Research. 40:2000;3829-3839.
56. Whitney D., Murakami I. Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation. Nature Neuroscience. 1:1998;656-657.
57. Whitney D., Murakami I., Cavanagh P. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research. 40:2000;137-149.