When is connectivity important? A case study of the spatial pattern of sudden oak death

Oikos

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 485-493

  Ellis, Alicia M ^a,b   Václavík, Tomáš ^a   Meentemeyer, Ross K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; DECIDUOUS TREE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EUKARYOTE; FRAGMENTATION; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; MORTALITY; PATH ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

CALIFORNIA; OREGON; UNITED STATES;

LITHOCARPUS; PHYTOPHTHORA RAMORUM;

EID: 77955513067     PISSN: 00301299     EISSN: 16000706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17918.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adriaensen, F. et al. 2003. The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model. - Landscape Urban Plann. 64: 233-247.
2. Agrios, G. 2005. Plant pathology. - Academic Press.
3. Aylor, D. E. 2003. Spread of plant disease on a continental scale: role of aerial dispersal of pathogens. - Ecology 84: 1989-1997.
4. Bring, J. 1994. How to standardize regression coefficients. - Am. Stat. 48: 209-213.
5. Calabrese, J. M. and Fagan, W. F. 2004. A comparison - shopper's guide to connectivity metrics. - Front. Ecol. Environ. 2: 529-536.
6. Cantwell, M. D. and Forman, R. T. T. 1993. Landscape graphs - ecological modeling with graph-theory to detect configurations common to diverse landscapes. - Landscape Ecol. 8: 239-255.
7. Condeso, T. E. and Meentemeyer, R. K. 2007. Effects of landscape heterogeneity on the emerging forest disease sudden oak death. - J. Ecol. 95: 364-375.
8. Cushman, J. H. and Meentemeyer, R. K. 2008. Multi-scale patterns of human activity and the incidence of an exotic forest pathogen. - J. Ecol. 96: 766-776.
9. Davidson, J. M. et al. 2005. Transmission of Phytophthora ramorum in mixed-evergreen forest in California. - Phytopathology 95: 587-595.
10. Dubayah, R. C. 1994. Modeling a solar radiation topoclimatology for the Rio Grande river basin. - J. Veg. Sci. 5: 627-640.
11. Eastman, J. R. 1989. Pushbroom algorithms for calculating distances in raster grids. - Proc. AUTOCARTO 9: 288-297.
12. Eastman, J. R. 2006. IDRISI Andes guide to GIS and image pocessing. - IDRISI Productions 1987-2006 Clark Univ., Clark Labs.
13. Fitt, B. D. L. et al. 1989. The role of rain in dispersal of pathogen inoculum. - Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 27: 241-270.
14. Goovaerts, P. 2000. Geostatistical approaches for incorporating elevation into the spatial interpolation of rainfall. - J. Hydrol. 228: 113-129.
15. Hanski, I. 1994. Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 131-135.
16. Hanski, I. 1999. Metapopulation ecology. - Oxford Univ. Press.
17. Havel, J. E. et al. 2002. Estimating dispersal from patterns of spread: spatial and local control of lake invasions. - Ecology 83: 3306-3318.
18. Holdenrieder, O. et al. 2004. Tree diseases and landscape processes: the challenge of landscape pathology. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 19: 446-452.
19. Jeger, M. J. et al. 2007. Modelling disease spread and control in networks: implications for plant science. - New Phytol. 174: 279-297.
20. Keitt, T. H. et al. 1997. Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. - Conserv. Ecol. [online] 1: 4..
21. Kelly, M. and Meentemeyer, R. K. 2002. Landscape dynamics of the spread of sudden oak death. - Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 68: 1001-1009.
22. Kindlmann, P. and Burel, F. 2008. Connectivity measures: a review. - Landscape Ecol. 23: 879-890.
23. Koscinski, D. et al. 2009. Effects of landscape and history on diversification of a montane, stream-breeding amphibian. - J. Biogeogr. 36: 255-265.
24. Kostova, T. 2009. Interplay of node connectivity and epidemic rates in the dynamics of epidemic networks. - J. Difference Eq. Appl. 15: 415-428.
25. Magle, S. B. et al. 2009. A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA. - Landscape Ecol. 24: 267-280.
26. Mascheretti, S. et al. 2008. Reconstruction of the sudden oak death epidemic in California through microsatellite analysis of the pathogen Phytophthora ramorum. - Mol. Ecol. 17: 2755-2768.
27. McCartney, H. A. and Fitt, B. D. L. 1985. Construction of dispersal models. - In: Ingram, D. et al. (eds), Advances in plant pathology. Vol. 3, Mathematical modeling of crop disease. Academic Press, pp. 107-143.
28. Meentemeyer, R. et al. 2004. Mapping the risk of establishment and spread of sudden oak death in California. - For. Ecol. Manage. 200: 195-214.
29. Meentemeyer, R. K. et al. 2008a. Early detection of emerging forest disease using dispersal estimation and ecological niche modeling. - Ecol. Appl. 18: 377-390.
30. Meentemeyer, R. K. et al. 2008b. Influence of land-cover change on the spread of an invasive forest pathogen. - Ecol. Appl. 18: 159-171.
31. Minor, E. S. and Urban, D. L. 2008. A graph-theory framework for evaluating landscape connectivity and conservation planning. - Conserv. Biol. 22: 297-307.
32. Moilanen, A. and Nieminen, M. 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. - Ecology 83: 1131-1145.
33. Moore, I. D. et al. 1991. Digital terrain modellling. A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. - Hydrol. Processes 5: 3-30.
34. Ostfeld, R. S. et al. 2005. Spatial epidemiology: an emerging (or re-emerging) discipline. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 328-336.
35. Plantegenest, M. et al. 2007. Landscape epidemiology of plant diseases. - J. R. Soc. Interface 4: 963-972.
36. Ristaino, J. B. and Gumpertz, M. L. 2000. New frontiers in the study of dispersal and spatial analysis of epidemics caused by species in the genus Phytophthora. - Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 38.
37. Rizzo, D. M. and Garbelotto, M. 2003. Sudden oak death: endangering California and Oregon forest ecosystems. - Front. Ecol. Environ. 1: 197-204.
38. Rizzo, D. M. et al. 2005. Phytophthora ramorum: Integrative research and management of an emerging pathogen in California and Oregon forests. - Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 43: 309-335.
39. Sutcliffe, O. L. et al. 2003. Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: methodology and application to butterfly movement. - Landscape Urban Plann. 63: 15-31.
40. Taylor, P. D. et al. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. - Oikos 68: 571-573.
41. Tischendorf, L. and Fahrig, L. 2000. How should we measure landscape connectivity? - Landscape Ecol. 15: 633-641.
42. Urban, D. and Keitt, T. 2001. Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. - Ecology 82: 1205-1218.
43. Walker, R. and Craighead, L. 1997. Least-cost-path analysis. - In: Proc. 17th Annu. ESRI Int. Users Conf. on Analysing Wildlife Movement Corridors in Montana Using GIS.
44. Wiens, J. A. 2001. The landscape context of dispersal. - In: Clobert, J. et al. (eds), Dispersal. Oxford Univ. Press.