How should we measure landscape connectivity?

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 15, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 633-641

  Tischendorf, L ^a,b   Fahrig, L ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONNECTIVITY; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; MEASUREMENT METHOD;

EID: 0033780010     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1008177324187     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Discontinuous habitat corridors: Effects on male root vole movements
2. Patterns of movement of radioactive carabid beetles
3. Movements of Abax parallelepipedus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in woody habitats of a hedgerow network landscape: A radio-tracing study
4. Effects of habitat fragmentation on meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) population dynamics in experiment landscape patches
5. Fencerows, edges, and implications of changing connectivity illustrated by two contiguous Ohio landscapes
6. Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Sigmon, Microtus, and Peromyscus)
7. Spatial scale mediates the influence of habitat fragmentation on dispersal success: Implications for conservation
8. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction
9. When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival?
10. Effects of grassy banks on the dispersal of some carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on farmland
11. Dispersal in small mammals
12. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern
13. Spatial scaling and animal population dynamics
14. Connectivity and complexity in landscapes and ecosystems
15. Dispersal and connectivity in metapopulations
16. The elements of connectivity where corridor quality is variable
17. Permeabilities of patch boundaries to benthic invertebrates-Influences of boundary contrast, light level, and faunal density and mobility
18. Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes
19. Relative success of residents and immigrants in Peromyscus leucopus
20. An analysis of dispersal in an unmanipulated population of Peromyscus leucopus
21. Removal trapping studies of dispersal in Peromyscus leucopus
22. The role of dispersal in the demography of small mammals
23. Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields
24. Linear barriers to arthropod movements in the landscape
25. Interpatch movement of the red milkweed beetle, Tetraopes tetraophthalmus: Individual responses to patch size and isolation
26. Barriers as boundaries for metapopulations and demes of Peromyscus lencopus in farm landscapes
27. The structural connectivity threshold: An hypothesis in conservation biology at the landscape scale
28. Connectivity in fragmented populations-Abax parallelepipedus in a hedgerow network landscape
29. Effects of landscape dynamics on the metapopulation of a ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a hedgerow network
30. An experimental assessment of landscape connectivity
31. Dispersal patterns of lynx in the northwest territories
32. Pattern of movement in and dispersal from a Dutch forest of Carabus problematicus Hbst. (Coleoptera, Carabidae)
33. Assessing the data requirements of spatially explicit dispersal models
34. Between-habitat movement of dusky-footed woodrats and vulnerability to predation
35. Dispersal and habitat connectivity in complex heterogeneous landscapes: An analysis with a GIS-based random walk model
36. Using landscape indices to predict habitat connectivity
37. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure
38. Modeling individual movements in heterogeneous landscapes: Potentials of a new approach
39. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity
40. Movements of carabid beetles (Coleoptera Carabidae) inhabiting cereal fields: A field tracing study
41. Patchy landscapes and animal movements: Do beetles percolate?
42. The application of neutral landscape models in conservation biology
43. Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments
44. The use and misuse of neutral landscape models in ecology