Modelling the benefits of farmland restoration: Methodology and application to butterfly movement

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 15-31

  Sutcliffe, Odette L ^a   Bakkestuen, Vegar ^a   Fry, Gary ^a   Stabbetorp, Odd E ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Aphantopus hyperantus; Ecological distance; GIS; Heodes virgaureae; Movement; Restoration

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ECOLOGY; FARMS;

FARMLAND RESTORATION;

URBAN PLANNING;

BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; GIS; HABITAT CORRIDOR; MODELING; RESTORATION ECOLOGY;

APHANTOPUS HYPERANTUS;

EID: 0037429613     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00153-6     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andreassen, H.P., Ims, R.A., 1998. Betydningen av åkerlandskapets struktur for artene. In: Framstad, E., Lid, I.B. (Eds.), Jordbrukets kulturlandskap: forvaltning av miljøverdier. Universitetsforlaget AS, Oslo, Norway, pp. 128-137.
2. Bakkestuen, V., Dramstad, W.E., Fjellstad, W.J., 2001. Landscape changes in multifunctional landscapes change multiple functions. In: Mander, Ü., Printsmann, A., Palang, H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 European Conference of the International Association of Landscape Ecology on Development of European Landscapes, vol. 1. Stockholm, Sweden, Tartu, Estonia, 30th June-5th July 2001, Institute of Geography, University of Tartu, pp. 378-382.
3. Begon, M., 1979. Investigating Animal Abundance: Capture-Recapture for Biologists. Edward Arnold, London.
4. Beier, P., 1993. Determining minimum habitat areas and habitat corridors for cougars. Conserv. Biol. 7, 94-108.
5. Bekkby, T., Erikstad, L., Bakkestuen, V., Bjørge, A., in press. A landscape ecological approach to coastal zone applications. Sarsia.
6. Charrier, S., Petit, S., Burel, F., 1997. Movement of Abax parallelepipedus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in woody habitats of a hedgerow network landscape: a radio-tracing study. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 61, 133-144.
7. Clergeau, P., Burel, F., 1997. The role of spatio-temporal patch connectivity at the landscape level: an example in a bird distribution. Landscape Urban Plann. 38, 37-43.
8. Dover, J.W., Fry, G., 2001. Experimental simulation of some visible and physical components of a hedge and the effects on butterfly behaviour in an agricultural landscape. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 100, 221-233.
9. ESRI Inc., 1996. ArcView™ GIS 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, CA.
10. Fahrig, L., 1998. When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival? Ecol. Model. 105, 273-292.
11. Fortin, M., Gurevitch, J., 1993. Mantel tests: spatial structure in field experiments. In: Scheiner, S.M., Gurevitch, J. (Eds.), Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 342-359.
12. Fischer, K., Beinlich, B., Plachter, H., 1999. Population structure, mobility and habitat preferences of the violet copper Lycaena helle (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in western Germany: implications for conservation. J. Insect Conserv. 3, 43-52.
13. Fjellstad, W.J., 1998. The Landscape Ecology Of Butterflies in Traditionally Managed Norwegian Farmland. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Durham, UK.
14. Framstad, E., Lid, I.B., 1998. Jordbrukets kulturlandskap. Universitetsforlaget AS, Oslo, Norway.
15. Fry, G., 1991. Conservation in agricultural systems. In: Spellerberg, I.F., Goldsmith, F.B., Morris, M.G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the BES Symposium on Scientific Management of Temperate Communities for Nature Conservation, vol. 31. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp. 415-443.
16. Fry, G.L., 1994. The role of field boundaries in the landscape. In: Boatman, N. (Ed.), Field Margins: Integrating Agriculture and Conservation. BCPC Monograph No. 58, Thorton Heath, pp. 31-40.
17. Gustafson, E.J., Gardner, R.H., 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonisation. Ecology 77, 94-107.
18. Hanski, I.A., Gilpin, M.E., 1997. Metapopulation Biology-Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic press, USA.
19. Hanski, I., Thomas, C.D., 1994. Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: a spatially explicit model applied to butterflies. Biol. Conserv. 68, 167-180.
20. Harris, L.D., Scheck, J., 1991. From implications to applications: the dispersal corridor principle applied to the conservation of biological diversity. In: Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J. (Eds.), The Role of Corridors Nature Conservation (Part 2). Surry-Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia, pp. 189-220.
21. Harrison, S., Bruna, E., 1999. Habitat fragmentation and large-scale conservation: what do we know for sure? Ecography 22, 225-232.
22. Hehl-Lange, S., 2001. Structural elements of the visual landscape and their ecological functions. Landscape Urban Plann. 54, 107-115.
23. Hill, M.O., 1993. The Role of Corridors, Stepping Stones and Islands for Species Conservation in a Changing Climate. Research Report no. 75, English Nature, Peterborough, UK.
24. Huntley, B., 1991. How plants respond to climate change migration rates, individualism and the consequences for plant communities. Ann. Bot. 67 (Suppl. 1), 15-22.
25. Kindvall, O., 1999. Dispersal in a metapopulation of the bush cricket, Metrioptera bicolor (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 172-185.
26. Knaapen, J.P., Scheffer, M., Harms, B., 1992. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plann. 23, 1-16.
27. Kuussaari, M., Nieminen, M., Hanski, I., 1996. An experimental study of migration in the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 791-801.
28. Leduc, A., Drapeau, P., Bergeron, Y., Legendre, P., 1992. Study of spatial components of forest cover using partial Mantel tests and path analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 3, 62-78.
29. Legendre, P., 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74, 1659-1673.
30. Legendre, P., Fortin, M., 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80, 107-138.
31. Legendre, P., Vaudor, A. 1991. The R-Package: Multidimension Analysis, Spatial Analysis. Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, iv + 142 pp.
32. Manley, B.F.J., 1986. Randomisation and regression methods for testing for associations with geographical, environmental and biological distances between populations, environmental and biological distances between populations. Res. Population Ecol. 28, 201-218.
33. Mantel, N., 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalised regression approach. Cancer Res. 27, 209-220.
34. Mauremooto, J.R., Wratten, S.D., Worner, S.P., Fry, G., 1995. Permeability of hedgerows to predatory carbide beetles. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 52, 141-148.
35. Merriam, G., 1984. Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. In: Brandt, J., Agger, P.A. (Eds.), Methodology in Landscape Ecological Research and Planning, vol. 1. University Centre, Roskilde, Denmark, pp. 5-15.
36. Michels, E., Cottenie, K., Neys, L., De Gelas, K., Coppin, P., De Meester, L., 2001. Geographical and genetic distances among zooplankton population in a set of interconnected ponds: a plea for using GIS modelling of the effective geographical distance. Mol. Ecol. 10 (8), 1929-1938.
37. Moilanen, A., Hanski, I., 1998. Metapopulation dynamics: effects of habitat quality and landscape structure. Ecology 79, 2503-2515.
38. Opdam, P., 1990. Dispersal in fragmented populations: the key to survival. In: Bunce, R.G.H., Howard, D.C. (Eds.), Species Dispersal in Agricultural Habitats. Belhaven Press, London, pp. 3-17.
39. Pollard, E., Yates, T.J., 1993. Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation. Chapman and Hall, London.
40. Pollock, K.H., Nichols, J.D., Brownie, C., Hines, J.E., 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monogr. 107, 1-97.
41. Ray, N., 1999. Friction.costdistancematrix. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Anthropology and Ecology Department, University of Geneva, Switzerland, ArcView script at http://gis.esri.com/arcscripts/scripts.cfm.
42. Roland, J., Keyghobadi, N., Fownes, S., 2000. Alpine Parnassius butterfly dispersal: effects of landscape and population size. Ecology 81, 1642-1653.
43. Simberloff, D., Cox, J., 1987. Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conserv. Biol. 1, 63-71.
44. Simberloff, D., Farr, J.A., Cox, J., Mehlman, D.W., 1992. Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments? Conserv. Biol. 6, 493-504.
45. Smouse, P.E., Long, J.C., Sokal, R.R., 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst. Zool. 35, 727-732.
46. Sutcliffe, O.L., Thomas, C.D., 1996. Open corridors appear to facilitate dispersal by ringlet butterflies (Aphantopus hyperantus) between woodland clearings. Conserv. Biol. 10, 1359-1365.
47. Taylor, P.D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K., Merriam, G., 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68, 571-573.
48. Thomas, C.D., 1991. Ecological Corridors: An Assessment. Science and Research Series no. 34, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
49. Thomas, C.F.G., Green, F., Marshall, E.J.P., 1997. Distribution, dispersal and population size of the ground beetles, Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger) and Harpalus rufipes (Degeer) (Coleoptera, Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger) and Harpalus rufipes (Degeer) (Coleoptera, Carabidae), in field margin habitats. Biol. Agric. Hortic. 15, 337-352.
50. Vermeulen, H.J.W., 1994. Corridor function of a road verge for dispersal of stenotopic heathland ground beetles Carabidae. Biol. Conserv. 69, 339-349.
51. Vos, C.C., Chardon, J.P., 1997. Landscape resistance and dispersal in fragmented populations: a case study of the tree frog (Hyla arborea) in an agricultural landscape. In: Cooper, A., Power, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th annual IALE (UK) Conference on Species Dispersal and Land Use Processes. Coleraine, pp. 19-26.
52. Walker, R., Craighead, L. 1997. Least-cost-path analysis. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual ESRI International Users Conference on Analysing Wildlife Movement Corridors in Montana Using GIS. San Diego, CA.
53. Wiens, J.A., 1997. Metapopulation dynamics and landscape ecology. In: Hanski, I.A., Gilpin, M.E. (Eds.), Metapopulation Biology-Ecology, Genetics and Evolution. Academic Press, London, pp. 43-62.
54. With, K.A., Crist, T.O., 1995. Critical thresholds in species responses to landscape structure. Ecology 76, 2446-2459.
55. Zollner, P.A., Lima, S.L., 1999. Search strategies for landscape-level inter-patch movements. Ecology 80, 1019-1030.