Physiological arousal in processing recognition information: Ignoring or integrating cognitive cues?

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 285-299

  Hochman, Guy ^a   Ayal, Shahar ^b   Glöckner, Andreas ^c  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Affect; Noncompensatory models; Parallel constraint satisfaction; Physiological arousal; Recognition heuristic

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955488169     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Alba, J. W., & Hutchinson, J. W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411-454.
2. Andreassi, J. L. (2000). Psychophysiology: Human behavior and physiological response. Mahwah, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Annoni, J. M., Ptak, R., Caldara-Schnetzer, A. R., Khateb, A., & Pollermann, B. Z. (2003). Decoupling of autonomic and cognitive emotional reactions after cerebellar stroke. Annals of Neurology, 53, 654-658.
4. Ariely, D., & Levav, J. (2000). Sequential Choice in Group Settings: Taking the Road Less Traveled and Less Enjoyed. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 279-290.
5. Ayal, S., & Hochman, G. (2009). Ignorance or integration: The cognitive processes underlying choice behavior. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 455-474.
6. Ayal, S., & Zakay, D. (2009). The perceived diversity heuristic: the case of pseudodiversity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 559-573.
7. Ballantyne, R., Warren, A., & Nobbs, K. (2006). The evolution of brand choice. Journal of Brand Management, 13, 339-352.
8. Bawa, K. (1990). Modeling inertia and variety seeking tendencies in brand choice behavior. Marketing Science, 9, 263-278.
9. Bergert, F. B., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2007). A responsetime approach to comparing generalized rational and take-the-best models of decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 107-129.
10. Betsch, C. (2008). Chronic preferences for intuition and deliberation in decision making: Lessons learned about intuition from an individual differences approach. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 252-269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Borges, B., Goldstein, D. G., Ortmann, A., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). Can ignorance beat the stock market? In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 59-72). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Brandstätter, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2008). Risky choice with heuristics: Reply to Birnbaum (2008),
13. Johnson, Schulte-Mecklenbeck, and Willemsen, and Rieger and Wang (2008). Psychological Review, 115, 281-290.
14. Bröder, A. (2003). Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox": Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 611-625.
15. Bröder, A. & Eichler, A. (2006). The use of recognition information and additional cues in inference from memory. Acta Psychologica, 121, 275-284.
16. Bröder, A., & Newell, B. R. (2008). Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 205-214.
17. Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003). Bayesian strategy assessment in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 193-213.
18. Busemeyer, J. R., & Townsend, J. T. (1993). Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review, 100, 432-459.
19. Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., & Berntson, G. G. (2007). Handbook of psychophysiology. Cambridge University Press.
20. Cotte, J., & Wood, S. L. (2004). Families and innovative consumer behavior: A triadic analysis of sibling and parental influance. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 78-86.
21. Chintagunta, P. K. (1998). Inertia and variety seeking in a model of brand-purchase timing. Marketing Science, 17, 253-270.
22. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.
23. Erev, I., Wallsten, T. S., & Budescu, D. V. (1994). Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psychological Review, 101, 519-527.
24. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
25. Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103, 650-669.
27. Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506-528.
28. Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & The ABC research group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Glöckner, A. (2008). Does intuition beat fast and frugal heuristics? A systematic empirical analysis. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 309-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Glöckner, A. (2009). Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The Multiple-Measure Maximum Likelihood strategy classification method. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 186-199.
31. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008a). Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the priority heuristic against cumulative prospect theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 75-95.
32. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008b). Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 215-228.
33. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008c). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1055-1075.
34. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2010). Decisions beyond boundaries: When more information is processed faster than less. Manuscript submitted for publication.
35. Glöckner, A., Betsch, T., & Schindler, N. (in press). Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.
36. Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (in press). Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A modelbased analysis of choice, confidence, and response time. Judgment and Decision Making.
37. Glöckner, A., & Hochman, G. (in press). The interplay of experience-based affective and probabilistic cues in decision making: Arousal increases when experience and additional cues conflict. Experimental Psychology.
38. Glöckner, A., & Hodges, S. D. (in press). Parallel constraint satisfaction in memory-based decisions. Experimental Psychology.
39. Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 37-48). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75-90.
41. Hilbig, B. E., & Pohl, R. F. (2008). Recognizing users of the recognition heuristic. Experimental Psychology, 55, 394-401.
42. Hilbig, B. E., & Pohl, R. F. (2009). Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: A decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1296-1305.
43. Hilbig, B. E. (in press). Reconsidering "evidence" for fast and frugal heuristics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
44. Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 283-295.
45. Hirschman, E. C., & Wallendorf, M. (1982). Motives underlying marketing information acquisition and knowledge transfer. Journal of Advertising, 11, 25-31.
46. Hochman, G., Glöckner, A., & Yechiam, E. (2010). Physiological measures in identifying decision strategies. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 139-159). London: Psychology Press & Routledge.
47. Holyoak, K. J., & Simon, D. (1999). Bidirectional reasoning in decision making by constraint satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 3-31.
48. Holyoak, K. J., & Spellman, B. A. (1993). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 265-315.
49. Horstmann, N., Ahlgrimm, A., & Glöckner, A. (2009). How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 335-354.
50. Iani, C., Gopher, D., & Lavie, P. (2004). Effects of task difficulty and invested mental effort on peripheral vasoconstriction. Psychophysiology, 41, 789-798.
51. Iani, C., Gopher, D., Grunwald, A. J., & Lavie, P. (2007). Peripheral arterial tone as an on-line measure of load in a simulated flight task. Ergonomic, 50, 1026-1035.
52. Karasik, R., Sapir, N, Ashkenazy, Y., Ivanov, P. C., Dvir, I., Lavie, P., & Havlin, S. (2002). Correlation differences in heartbeat fluctuations during rest and exercise. Physical Review E, 66, 62902-62904.
53. Klabunde, R. E. (2005). Cardiovascular Physiology Concepts. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
54. Lavie, P., Schnall, R. P., Sheffy, J., & Shlitner, A. (2000). Peripheral vasoconstriction during REM sleep detected by a new plethysmographic method. Nature Medicine, 6, 606.
55. Macdonald, E., & Sharp, B. (2000). Brand Awareness Effects on Consumer Decision Making for a Common, Repeat Purchase Product: A Replication. Journal of Business Research, 48, 5-15.
56. Manning, K. C., Bearden, W. O., & Madden, T. J. (1995). Consumer innovativeness and the adaptation process. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4, 329-346.
57. Marewski, J. N., Gaissmaier, W., Schooler, L. J., Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). From recognition to decisions: Extending and testing recognitionbased models for multi-alternative inference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 287-309.
58. McAlister, L. (1982). A dynamic attribute satiation model of variety-seeking behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 141-150.
59. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
60. McCloy, R. & Beaman, C. P. (2004). The recognition heuristic: Fast and frugal but not as simple as it seems. In: K. Forbus, D. Gentner, & T. Regier (Eds.). Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 933-937). Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum.
61. Menon, S., & Kahn, B. E. (1995). The impact of context on variety seeking in product choices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 285-295.
62. Newell, B. R. & Fernandez, D. R. (2006). On the binary quality of recognition and the inconsequentiality of further knowledge: Two critical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 333-346.
63. Newell, B. R. & Shanks, D. R. (2004). On the role of recognition in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 30, 923-935.
64. Newell, B. R. (2005). Re-visions of rationality? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 11-15.
65. Oppenheimer, D. M. (2003). Not so fast! (and not so frugal!): Rethinking the recognition heuristic. Cognition, 90, B1-B9.
66. Pachur, T., & Biele, G. (2007). Forecasting from ignorance: The use and usefulness of recognition in lay predictions of sport events. Acta Psychologica, 125, 99-116.
67. Pachur, T. & Hertwig, R. (2006). On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: Retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 32, 983-1002.
68. Pachur, T., Bröder, A., & Marewski, J. N. (2008). The recognition heuristic in memory-based inference: Is recognition a non-compensatory cue? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 183-210.
69. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552.
70. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
71. Penzel, T., Fricke, R., Jerrentrup, A., Peter, J., & Vogelmeier, C. (2002). Peripheral arterial tonometry for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering, 47, 315-317.
72. Pohl, R. F. (2006). Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 251-271.
73. Raju, P. S. (1980). Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality, demographics, and exploratory behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 272-282.
74. Ratner, R. K., Kahn, B. E., & Kahneman, D. (1999). Choosing less preferred experiences for the sake of variety. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 1-15.
75. Read, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1995). Diversification bias: Explaining the discrepancy in variet seeking between combined and separated choices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1, 34-49.
76. Read, S. J., Vanman, E. J., & Miller, L. C. (1997). Connectionism, parallel constraint satisfaction processes, and Gestalt principles: (Re) introducing cognitive dynamics to social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 26-53.
77. Reimer, T., & Katsikopoulos, K.V. (2004). The use of recognition in group decision-making. Cognitive Science, 28, 1009-1029.
78. Richter, T. & Späth, P. (2006). Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 32,150-162.
79. Russo, J. E., Carlson, K. A., Meloy, M. G., & Yong, K. (2008). The goal of consistency as a cause of information distortion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 456-470.
80. Schweizer, T. S. (2006). The psychology of noveltyseeking, creativity and innovation: Neurocognitive aspects within a work-psychological perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 164-172.
81. Serwe, S., & Frings, C. (2006). Who will win Wimbledon? The recognition heuristic in predicting sport events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 321-332.
82. Simon, D., Krawczyk, D. C., Bleicher, A., & Holyoak, K. J. (2008). The transience of constructed preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 1-14.
83. Simon, D., Snow, C. J., & Read, S. J. (2004). The Redux of Cognitive Consistency Theories: Evidence Judgments by Constraint Satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 814-837.
84. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397-420). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
85. Sokol-Hessner, P., Hsu, M., Curley, N. G., Delgado, M. R., Camerer, C. F., & Phelps, E. A. (2009). Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 5035-5040.
86. Sujan, M., & Bettman J. R. (1989). The effects of brand positioning strategies on consumers' brand and category perceptions: Some insights from schema research. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 454-467.
87. Thagard, P. (1989). Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 435-502.
88. Thagard, P., & Millgram, E. (1995). Inference to the best plan: A coherence theory of decision. In A. Ram & D. B. Leake (Eds.), Goal-driven learning (pp. 439-454). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Wood, S. L., & Lynch, J. G. Jr. (2002). Prior knowledge and complacency in new product learning. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 416-426.