High-stringency tandem affinity purification of proteins conjugated to ubiquitin-like moieties

Nature Protocols

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 873-882

  Golebiowski, Filip ^a   Tatham, Michael H ^a   Nakamura, Akihiro ^b   Hay, Ronald T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b GUNMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMAN; TUMOR CELL LINE;

CELL LINE, TUMOR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; HUMANS; PROTEINS; UBIQUITINS;

EID: 77955479945     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2010.40     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Geiss-Friedlander, R., Melchior, F. Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 947-956 (2007)
2. Girdwood, D.W., Tatham, M.H., Hay, R.T. SUMO and transcriptional regulation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 201-210 (2004).
3. Hoege, C., Pfander, B., Moldovan, G.L., Pyrowolakis, G., Jentsch, S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419, 135-141 (2002).
4. Muller, S., Ledl, A., Schmidt, D., SUMO: a regulator of gene expression and genome integrity. Oncogene 23, 1998-2008 (2004).
5. Pichler, A., Melchior, F. Ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO1 and nucleocytoplasmic transport. Traffic 3, 381-387 (2002).
6. Stelter, P., Ulrich, H.D. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425, 188-191 (2003).
7. Hay, R.T. Role of ubiquitin-like proteins in transcriptional regulation. Ernst Schering Res. Found. Workshop 173-192 (2006).
8. Herrmann, J., Lerman, L.O., Lerman, A. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins in protein regulation. Circ. Res. 100, 1276-1291 (2007).
9. Jentsch, S., Pyrowolakis, G. Ubiquitin and its kin: how close are the family ties? Trends Cell Biol. 335-342 (2000).
10. Bergink, S., Jentsch, S. Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modificationsin DNA repair. Nature 458, 461-467 (2009)
11. Tagwerker, C. et al. A tandem affinity tag for two-step purification under fully denaturing conditions: application in ubiquitin profiling and protein complex identification combined with in vivo cross-linking. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5, 737-748 (2006).
12. Saitoh, H., Pu, R.T., Dasso, M. SUMO-1: wrestling with a new ubiquitinrelated modifier. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 374-376 (1997).
13. Hay, R.T. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol. Cell 18, 1-12 (2005).
14. Saitoh, H., Hinchey, J. Functional heterogeneity of small ubiquitinrelated protein modifiers SUMO-1 versus SUMO-2/3. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 6252-6258 (2000).
15. Golebiowski, F. et al. System-wide changes to SUMO modifications in response to heat shock. Sci. Signal 2, ra24 (2009).
16. Andersen, J.S., Matic, I., Vertegaal, A.C. Identification of SUMO target proteins by quantitative proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 497, 19-31 (2009).
17. Rosas-Acosta, G., Russell, W.K., Deyrieux, A., Russell, D.H., Wilson, V.G. A universal strategy for proteomic studies of SUMO and other ubiquitinlike modifiers. mol. Cell Proteomics 4, 56-72(2005).
18. Matic, I. et al. In vivo identification of human small ubiquitin-like modifier polymerization sites by high accuracy mass spectrometry and an in vitro to in vivo strategy. Mol. Cell Proteomics 7, 132-144 (2008).
19. Chung, T.L. et al. In vitro modification of human centromere protein CENP-C fragments by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) protein: definitive identification of the modification sites by tandem mass spectrometry analysis of the isopeptides. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 39653-39662 (2004).
20. Cooper, H.J. et al. Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry for the analysis of small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification: identification of lysines in RanBP2 and SUMO targeted for modification during the E3 autoSUMOylation reaction. Anal. Chem. 77, 6310-63(2005).
21. Pedrioli, P.G. et al. Automated identification of SUMOylation sites using mass spectrometry and SUMmOn pattern recognition software. Nat. Methods 3, 533-539 (2006).
22. Zhao, Y., Kwon, S.W., Anselmo, A., Kaur, K., White, M.A. Broad spectrum identification of cellular small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO) substrate proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 20999-2100(2004).
23. Li, T. et al. Sumoylation of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins, zinc finger proteins, and nuclear pore complex proteins: a proteomic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8551-8(2004).
24. Vertegaal, A.C. et al. A proteomic study of SUMO-2 target proteins. J. Biol. Chem. (2004)
25. Gregan, J. et al. Tandem affinity purification of functional TAP-tagged proteins from human cells. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1145-1151 (2007).
26. Puig, O. et al. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 24, 218-229 (2001).
27. Rigaut, G. et al. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 1030-1032 (1999).
28. Desterro, J.M., Rodriguez, M.S., Hay, R.T. SUMO-1 modification of IkappaBalpha inhibits NF-kappaB activation. Mol. Cell 2, 233-239 (1998).
29. Shevchenko, A., Tomas, H., Havlis, J., Olsen, J.V., Mann, M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2856-2860 (2006).
30. Ong, S.E., Mann, M. A practical recipe for stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Nat. Protoc. 1, 2650-2660 (2006).
31. Mann, M. Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 95(2006).
32. Ong, S.E. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1, 376-386 (2002).
33. Schimmel, J. et al. The ubiquitin-proteasome system is a key component of the SUMO-2/3 cycle. Mol. Cell Proteomics 7, 2107-2122 (2008).
34. Xirodimas, D.P. Novel substrates and functions for the ubiquitin-like molecule NEDD8. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 36, 802-806 (2008).
35. Wisniewski, J.R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N., Mann, M., Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359-362 (2009).
36. Ros, A. et al. Protein purification by off-gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2, 151-156 (2002).
37. Nielsen, M.L. et al. Iodoacetamide-induced artifact mimics ubiquitination in mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 5, 459-460 (2008).
38. Hobbs, S., Jitrapakdee, S., Wallace, J.C. Development of a bicistronic vector driven by the human polypeptide chain elongation factor 1alpha promoter for creation of stable mammalian cell lines that express very high levels of recombinant proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.372 (1998).
39. Wang, M., You, J., Bemis, K.G., Tegeler, T.J., Brown, D.P. Label-free mass spectrometry-based protein quantification technologies in proteomic analysis. Brief Funct. Genomic Proteomic 7, 329-339 (2008).
40. Ong, S.E., Foster, L.J., Mann, M. Mass spectrometric-based approaches in quantitative proteomics. Methods 29, 124-130 (2003).
41. Ong, S.E., Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 252-262 (2005).
42. Gygi, S.P. et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 994-999 (1999).
43. Ishihama, Y., Rappsilber, J., Mann, M. Modular stop and go extraction tips with stacked disks for parallel and multidimensional peptide fractionation in proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 5, 988-994 (2006).
44. Cox, J. et al. A practical guide to the MaxQuant computational platform for SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 4, 698-705 (2009).
45. Pan, C., Kumar, C., Bohl, S., Klingmueller, U., Mann, M. Comparative proteomic phenotyping of cell lines and primary cells to assess preservation of cell type-specific functions. Mol. Cell Proteomics 8, 443-450 (2009).
46. Park, S.K., Venable, J.D., Xu, T., Yates, J.R.A. III quantitative analysis software tool for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods 5, 319-322 (2008)