Introduction of a novel teaching paradigm for head and neck anatomy

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 349-355

  Chen, Kuan Chin Jean ^a,b   Glicksman, Jordan T ^a   Haase, Peter ^a   Johnson, Marjorie ^a   Wilson, Tim ^a   Fung, Kevin ^a  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Computer assisted learning; Head and neck anatomy; Undergraduate medical education

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISSECTION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HEAD; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MULTIMEDIA; NECK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGEON; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; FOLLOW UP; PILOT STUDY; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TEACHING; YOUNG ADULT;

ANATOMY, REGIONAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEAD; HUMANS; NECK; PILOT PROJECTS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77955451622     PISSN: 19160216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2010.090160     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Functions and structure of a medical school. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Available at: http://www.lcme.org/pubs.htm#fands (accessed March 10, 2009).
2. Carr MM, Reznick RK, Brown DH. Comparison of computer-assisted instruction and seminar instruction to acquire psychomotor and cognitive knowledge of epistaxis management. J Otolaryngol 2002;31:197-201.
3. Carr MM, Hewitt J, Scardamalia M, Reznick RK. Internet-based otolaryngology case discussions for medical students. J Otolaryngol 2002;31:197-201.
4. Beyea JA, Wong E, Bromwich M, et al. Evaluation of a particle repositioning maneuver web-based teaching module. Laryngoscope 2008;118:175-80.
5. Kandasamy T, Fung K. Interactive Internet-based cases for undergraduate otolaryngology education. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140:398-402.
6. Glicksman JT, Brandt MG, Moukarbel RV, et al. Computer-assisted teaching of epistaxis management: a randomized controlled trial. Laryngoscope 2009;119:466-72.
7. Hu A, Wilson T, Ladak H, et al. Evaluation of a three dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;135:677-81.
8. Malaney GD. You still need high response rates with web-based surveys. Student Affairs Online, University of Massachusetts 2002;3(1). Available at: http://www.studentaffairs.com/ejournal/winter-2002/rates.html (accessed September 1, 2009).
9. Carini RM, Hayek JC, Kuh GD, Ouimet JA. College student responses to Web and paper surveys: does mode matter? Res Higher Educ 2003;44:1-19.
10. Hardy N. Online ratings: fact and fiction. New Direct Teach Learn 2003;96:31-8.
11. Johnson TD. Online student ratings: will students respond? New Direct Teach Learn 2003;96:49-60.
12. McGhee DE, Lovell N. Psychometric properties of student ratings of instruction in online and oncampus courses. New Direct Teach Learn 2003;96:39-48.
13. Thorpe SW. Online student evaluation of instruction: an investigation of non-response bias. Presented at the 42nd Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research; 2002; Toronto. Available at: http://www.airweb.org/ forum02/550.pdf (accessed November 9, 2004).
14. Glicksman JT, Brandt MB, Parr J, Fung K. A needs assessment of undergraduate education in otolaryngology amongst family medicine residents. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;37:668-75.
15. Wong A, Fung K. ENT in undergraduate medical education. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;38:38-48.
16. Seyfer AE, Welling D, Fox JP. The value of surgeons teaching anatomy to first-year medical students. Bull Am Coll Surg 2007;92:8-14.
17. Slater JA, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Does gender influence learning style preferences of first-year medical students? Adv Physiol Educ 2007;31:336-42.
18. Wehrwein EA, Lujan HL, DiCarlo SE. Gender differences in learning style preferences among undergraduate physiology students. Adv Physiol Educ 2007;31:153-7.
19. Murphy RJ, Gray SA, Straja SR, et al. Student learning preferences and teaching implications. J Dent Educ 2004;68:859-66.