Skin Immunology and Sensitisation

Principles and Practice of Skin Toxicology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 149-168

  Basketter, David A ^a  

^a ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cocoamidopropyl betaine (CAPB) sensitising potency; Delayed ('Type IV') hypersensitivity; Local lymph node assay (LLNA); Robust in vitro (alternative) assays for sensitisation; Skin immunology and sensitisation; Skin sensitisation immune mediated response; Skin sensitisation allergic skin reaction (ACD); Skin sensitiser identification

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955447850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470773093.ch9     Document Type: Chapter

References (70)

1. Andersen, K.E. and Maibach, H.I. (eds). (1985). Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs: Current Problems in Dermatology, Karger,New York.
2. Andersen, K.E., Volund, A. and Frankild, S. (1996). The guinea pig maximization test with a multiple dose design. Acta Derm Venereol., 75(6): 463-9.
3. Api, A.M., Basketter, D.A., Cadby, P.A. et al. (2008). Dermal sensitisation quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol., submitted.
4. Balls,M. and Hellsten, E. Statement on the validity of the local lymph node assay for skin sensitisation testing. ECVAM Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, (2000): 28: 366-367.
5. Basketter, D.A. and Cadby, P. (2004). Reproducible prediction of contact allergenic potency using the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis, 50: 15-17.
6. Basketter, D.A. and Gerberick, G.F. (1996). Interlaboratory evaluation of the Buehler test. Contact Dermatitis, 35: 146-151.
7. Basketter, D.A. and Kimber, I. (2006). Predictive test for irritants and allergens and their use in quantitative risk assessment, in Contact Dermatitis, 4th Edn (Eds Frosch, P.J., Menné, T. and Lepoittevin, J.-P.), Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 179-188.
8. Basketter, D.A. and Kimber, I. (2007). Information derived from sensitisation test methods: test sensitivity, false positives and false negatives. Contact Dermatitis, 56: 1-4.
9. Basketter, D.A. andMaxwell, G. (2007). Identification and characterization of allergens: in vitro alternatives. Expert Reviews in Dermatology, 2: 471-480.
10. Basketter, D.A., Selbie, E., Scholes, E.W. et al. (1993). Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitisers in the maximisation, Buehler and local lymph node assays. Food Chem Toxic, 31: 63-67.
11. Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F., Kimber, I. and Loveless, S.E. (1996). The local lymph node assay-A viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitisation tests. Food and Chemical Toxicol, 34: 985-997.
12. Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F. and Kimber, I. (1998). Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive sensitisation tests. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 36: 327-333.
13. Basketter, D.A., Lea, L., Cooper, K. et al. (1999a). The identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay. Am J Cont Derm, 10: 207-212.
14. Basketter, D.A., Lea, L., Cooper, K. et al. (1999). A comparison of statistical approaches to derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses. J Appl Toxicol, 19: 261-266.
15. Basketter, D.A., Blaikie, L., Dearman, R.J. et al. (2000). Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency. Contact Dermatitis, 42: 344-348.
16. Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F. and Kimber, I. (2001). Skin sensitisation, vehicle effects and the local lymph node assay. Food Chem. Toxicol., 39: 621-627.
17. Basketter, D.A., Wilson, K., Gilmour, N.J. et al. (2003). Utility of historical vehicle control data in the interpretation of the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis, 49: 37-41.
18. Basketter, D.A., Andersen, K.E., Lidén, C. et al. (2005a). Evaluation of the skin sensitising potency of chemicals using existing methods and considerations of relevance for elicitation. Contact Dermatitis, 52: 39-43.
19. Basketter, D.A.,Clapp, C., Jefferies, D. et al. (2005b). Predictive identification of human skin sensitisation thresholds. Contact Dermatitis, 53: 260-267.
20. Basketter, D.A., McFadden, J., Evans, P. et al. (2006). Identification and classification of skin sensitisers: identifying false positives and false negatives. Contact Dermatitis, 55: 268-273.
21. Basketter, D.A., Casati, S., Cronin, M.T.D. et al. (2007a). Skin sensitisation and epidermal disposition. ATLA, 35: 137-154.
22. Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F. and Kimber, I. (2007b). The local lymph node assay EC3 value: status of validation. Contact Dermatitis, 57: 70-75.
23. Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F. and Kimber, I. (2007c). The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitising chemicals. Journal of Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 26: 293-301.
24. Basketter,D.A., Clapp,C.J., Safford, B.J. et al. (2007). Preservatives and skin sensitisation quantitative risk assessment: risk benefit considerations. Dermatitis, in press.
25. Buehler, E.V. (1965). Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. Arch Dermatol 91: 171-177.
26. Chan, P.D., Baldwin, R.C., Parson, R.D. et al. (1983). Kathon biocide: Manifestation of delayed contact dermatitis in guinea pigs is dependent on the concentration for induction and challenge. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 81: 409-411.
27. Cronin, M.TD. and Basketter, D.A. (1994). Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitisation database. SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research, 2: 159-179.
28. Dean, J.H., Twerdok, L.E., Tice, R.R. et al. (2001). ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. II. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 34: 258-273.
29. de Groot, A.C. (1990). Methylisothiazolinone/methylchloroisothiazolinone (Kathon CG) allergy: an updated review. Am J Cont Derm., 1: 151-156.
30. Divkovic, M., Pease, C.M., Gerberick, G.F. and Basketter, D.A. (2005). Hapten-protein binding: From theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitisation. Contact Dermatitis, 53: 189-200.
31. Felter, S.P., Robinson, M.K., Basketter, D.A. and Gerberick, G.F., (2002). A review of the scientific basis for default uncertainty factors for use in quantitative risk assessment of the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis, 47: 257-266.
32. Felter, S.P., Ryan, C.A., Basketter, D.A. and Gerberick, G.F. (2003). Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Regulatory Toxicol Pharmacol, 37: 1-10.
33. Frankild, S., Basketter, D.A. and Andersen, K.E. (1996). The value and limitations of rechallenge in the guinea pig maximisation test. Contact Dermatitis, 35: 135-140.
34. Friedmann, P.J. (2006). Contact sensitisation and allergic contact dermatitis: immunobiological mechanisms. Toxicol Lett, 15: 49-54.
35. Frosch, P.J., Menné, T. and Lepoittevin, J.-P. (2006). Contact Dermatitis, 4th Edn, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.
36. Gerberick, G.F., Ryan, C.A., Kimber, I. et al. (2000). Local lymph node assay validation assessment for regulatory purposes. Am J Cont Derm. 11: 3-18.
37. Gerberick, G.F., Robinson, M.K., Ryan, C.A. et al. (2001a). Contact allergenic potency: Correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Am J Cont Derm., 12: 156-161.
38. Gerberick, G.F., Robinson, M.K., Felter, S. et al. (2001b). Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Dermatitis, 45: 333-340.
39. Gerberick, G.F., Ryan, C.A., Kern, P.S. et al. (2004a). A chemical dataset for the evaluation of alternative approaches to skin sensitisation testing. Contact Dermatitis, 50: 274-288.
40. Gerberick, G.F., Vassallo, J.D., Bailey, R.E. et al. (2004b). Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens. Toxicol Sci., 81(2): 332-43.
41. Gerberick, G.F., Ryan, C.A., Kern, P.S. et al. (2005). Compilation of historical local lymph node assay data for the evaluation of skin sensitisation alternatives. Dermatitis, 16: 157-202.
42. Gerberick, G.F.,Vassallo, J.D., Foertsch, L.M. et al. (2007).Quantification ofChemical Peptide Reactivity for Screening Contact Allergens: A Classification TreeModel Approach. Toxicol Sci., 97: 417-427.
43. Griem, P., Goebel, C. and Scheffler, H. (2003). Proposal for a risk assessment methodology for skin sensitisation based on sensitisation potency data. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 38: 269-290.
44. Griffiths, C.E., R.J., Dearman, M., Cumberbatch and I., Kimber. (2005). Cytokines and Langerhans cell mobilisation in mouse and man. Cytokine. 32: 67-70.
45. Jowsey, I., Basketter, D.A., Westmoreland, C., Kimber, I., (2006). A future approach to measuring relative skin sensitising potency. J. Appl. Toxicol., 26: 341-350.
46. Kimber, I. and Basketter, D.A. (1992). The murine local lymph node assay; collaborative studies and new directions: A commentary. Food Chem Toxicol., 30: 165-169.
47. Kimber, I. and Basketter, D.A. (1997). Contact sensitisation: A new approach to risk assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 3: 385-395.
48. Kimber, I. and Dearman, R.J. (1991). Investigation of lymph node cell proliferation as a possible immunological correlate of contact sensitising potential. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 29: 125-129.
49. Kimber, I., Dearman, R.J., Scholes, E.W. and Basketter, D.A. (1994). The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. Toxicol., 93: 13-31.
50. Kimber, I., Basketter, D.A., Berthold, K. et al. (2001). Skin sensitisation testing in potency and risk assessment. Toxicological Sciences, 59: 198-208.
51. Kimber, I., Dearman, R.J., Gerberick, G.F. and Basketter, D.A. (2002). The local lymph node assay: past, present and future. Contact Dermatitis, 47: 315-328.
52. Kimber, I., Dearman, R.J., Betts et al. (2006). The local lymph node assay and skin sensitisation: a cut-down screen to reduce animal requirements. Contact Dermatitis, 54: 181-185.
53. Kligman, A.M. and Basketter, D.A. (1995). A critical commentary and updating of the guinea pig maximisation test. Contact Dermatitis, 32: 129-134.
54. Lahti, A. and Basketter, D.A. (2006). Immediate contact reactions, in Contact Dermatitis, 4th Edn (Eds, Frosch, P.J., Menné, T. and Lepoittevin, J.-P.), Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 83-96.
55. Lepoittevin, J.-P. (2006). Immediate contact reactions, in Contact Dermatitis, 4th Edn (Eds, Frosch, P.J., Menné, T. and Lepoittevin, J.-P.), Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 45-68.
56. Magnusson, B., Kligman, A.M. (1970). Allergic contact dermatitis in the guinea pig. Identification of contact allergens, Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Illinois.
57. Maurer, T., Weirich, E.G., Hess, R. The optimization test in the guinea pig in relation to other predictive sensitisation methods. Toxicology, (1980); 15(3): 163-171.
58. Matzinger, P. Friendly and dangerous signals: is the tissue in control? Nat Immunol., (2007): 8: 11-13.
59. McFadden, J.P. and Basketter, D.A. (2000). Contact allergy, irritancy and danger. Contact Dermatitis, 42: 123-127.
60. NIH (1999). The murine local lymph node assay: a test method for assessing the allergic contact dermatitis potential of chemicals/compounds. NIH No. 99-4494.
61. OECD Guidelines for Testing Chemicals. (1992). Guideline 406: skin sensitisation. Paris.
62. OECD Guidelines for Testing Chemicals. (2002). Guideline 429. Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay, Paris, 2002.
63. Roberts, D.W., Aptula, A.O. and Patlewicz, G. (2007a). Electrophilic chemistry related to skin sensitisation. Reaction mechanistic applicability domain classification for a published data set of 106 chemicals tested in the mouse local lymph node assay. Chem Res Toxicol., 20: 44-60.
64. Roberts, D.W., Patlewicz, G., Kern, P.S. et al. (2007b). Mechanistic applicability domain classification of a local lymph node assay dataset for skin sensitisation. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 16: 1019-1030.
65. Rustemeyer, T., van Hoogstraten, I.M.W., von Blomberg, B.M. and Scheper, R.J. (2006). Mechanisms in allergic contact dermatitis, in Contact Dermatitis, 4th Edn (Eds, Frosch, P.J., Menné, T. and Lepoittevin, J.-P.), Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 11-44.
66. Schneider, K. and Akkan, Z. (2004). Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitisation assays. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 39: 245-255.
67. Steiling,W., Basketter, D.A., Berthold, K. et al. (2001). Skin sensitisation testing-new perspectives and recommendations. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 39: 293-301.
68. Wahlberg, J.E. and Boman, A. (1985). Guinea pig maximization test, in Contact allergy predictive tests in guinea pigs: Current Problems in Dermatology, (eds Andersen, K.E. and Maibach, H.I.), Karger, New York, pp 65-106.
69. Weaver, J.E., Carding, C.W. and Maibach, H.I. (1985). Dose response assessments of Kathon biocide. I. Diagnostic use and diagnostic threshold patch testing with sensitised humans. Contact Dermatitis, 12: 141-145.
70. Zachariae, C., Rastogi, S., Devantier, C. et al. (2003). Methyldibromo glutaronitrile: clinical experience and exposure-based risk assessment. Contact Dermatitis, 48: 150-154.