Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay

American Journal of Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 207-212

  Basketter, David A ^a   Lea, Linda J ^b   Cooper, Karen J ^b   Ryan, Cindy A ^b   Gerberick, G Frank ^b   Dearman, Rebecca J ^b   Kimber, Ian ^b  

^a UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; ALUMINUM; BERYLLIUM; CHROMIUM; COBALT; CONTACT ALLERGEN; COPPER; GOLD; LEAD; MANGANESE; MERCURY; METAL; NICKEL; PLATINUM; TIN; ZINC;

ALLERGENICITY; ARTICLE; CHEMOSENSITIVITY; CONTACT ALLERGY; CONTACT DERMATITIS; DOSE RESPONSE; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN SENSITIZATION;

EID: 0032749663     PISSN: 1046199X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01634989-199912000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I, et al: The local lymph node assay - A viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. Food Chem Toxicol 34:985-997, 1996
2. Chamberlain M, Basketter DA: The local lymph node assay: Status of validation. Food Chem Toxicol 34:999-1002, 1996
3. NIH Publication no. 99-4494. The murine local lymph node assay: A test method for determining the allergic contact dermatitis potential of chemicals/compounds (1999)
4. Gerberick GF, Ryan CA, Kimber I, et al: Local lymph node assay validation assessment for regulatory purposes. Am J Contact Dermat, accepted, 1999
5. Manderwelt C, Clottens FL, Demedts M, et al: Assessment of the sensitizing potential of five metal salts in the local lymph node assay. Toxicology 120:65-73, 1997
6. Kimber I, Basketter DA: The murine local lymph node assay; collaborative studies and new directions: A commentary. Food Chem Toxicol 30:165-169, 1992
7. European Commission: Annex IV to Commission Directive 93/21/EEC of 27 April 1993 adapting to technical progress for the 18th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal of the European Communities 36:59, 1993
8. World Health Organization: Criteria for classification of skin and airway sensitizing substances in the work and general environments, in Flyvholm M-A, Andersen KE, Baranski B, Sarlo K (eds). Copenhagen, Denmark, WHO, 1997
9. Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, (eds): Textbook of Contact Dermatitis (ed 2). Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag, 1995
10. Kligman A: The identification of contact allergens by human assay. III. The maximization test: A procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. J Invest Dermatol 47:393-401, 1966
11. Schuppe H-G, Kulig J, Lerchenmüller C, et al: Contact hypersensitivity to disocium hexachloroplatinate in mice. Toxicology Lett 93:125-133, 1997
12. Menné T, Andersen KE, Kaaber K, et al: Tin: An overlooked contact sensitizer? Contact Dermatitis 16:9-10, 1987
13. Nguyen LQ, Allen HB: Reactions to manganese and cadmium in tattoos. Cutis 23:71-72, 1979
14. Basketter DA, Gerberick GF, Kimber I: Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests. Food Chem Toxicol 36:327-333, 1998
15. Fowler JF: Allergic contact dermatitis to metals. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1:212-223, 1990
16. Kimber I, Basketter DA: Contact hypersensitivity to metals, in LW Chang, L Magus and T Suzuki (eds): Toxicol of Metals. Boca Raton, FL, CRC, 1996, pp 827-833
17. Baer RL, Ramsey DL, Biondi E: The most common contact allergens. Arch Dermatol 108:74-78, 1973
18. Menné T, Christophersen J, Green A: Epidemiology of nickel dermatitis, in Maibach HI, Menné T (eds) Nickel and skin. Immunobiology and toxicology. Boca Raton, FL, CRC, 1989, pp 109-116
19. Basketter DA, Briatico-Vangosa G, Kaestner W, et al: Nickel, cobalt and chromium in consumer products: A role in allergic contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis 28:15-25, 1993
20. Burrows D: Adverse chromate reactions on the skin, in: Chromium: Metabolism and toxicity. Boca Raton, FL, CRC, 1983, pp 137-163
21. Cronin E: Contact Dermatitis, London, Churchill Livingstone, 1980
22. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF: Fisher's Textbook of Contact Dermatitis (ed 4). Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins, 1995
23. Wahlberg JE: Nickel: Animal sensitization assays. Nickel and skin, in Maibach HI and Menné T (eds): Immunobiology and Toxicology. Boca Raton, FL, CRC, 1989, pp 65-74
24. Gerberick GF, House RV, Fletcher ER, et al: Examination of the local lymph node assay for use in contact sensitization risk assessment. Fundam Appl Toxicol 19:438-445, 1992
25. Van Hoogstraten IM, Boos C, Boden D, et al: Oral induction of tolerance to nickel sensitization in mice. J Invest Dermatol 101:26-31, 1993
26. Karlberg AT, Boman A, Wahlberg JE: Copper: A rare sensitizer. Contact Dermatitis 9:134-139, 1983
27. Basketter DA, Flyvholm MA, Menné T: Classification criteria for skin sensitizing chemicals: A Commentary. Contact Dermatitis 40:175-182, 1998
28. Dearman RJ, Hilton J, Evans P, et al: Temporal stability of local lymph node assay responses to hexyl cinnamic aldehyde. J Appl Toxicol 18:281-284, 1998
29. Tichias K, Fentem J, Basketter DA, et al: Progress in toxicological testing: Reduction and refinement issues. ATLA 26:619-627, 1999
30. Basketter DA, Lea LJ, Dickens A, et al: A comparison of statistical approaches to derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses. J Appl Toxicol 19:261-266, 1999