A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin-sensitization testing

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 274-288

  Gerberick, G Frank ^a   Ryan, Cindy A ^a   Kern, Petra S ^a   Dearman, Rebecca J ^b   Kimber, Ian ^b   Patlewicz, Grace Y ^c   Basketter, David A ^c  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNILEVER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Allergen replacement; Allergens; Risk assessment; Skin sensitization

Indexed keywords

ALLERGEN; CHEMICAL COMPOUND;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SKIN SENSITIZATION; SKIN TEST;

ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; HUMANS; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 3042844427     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00290.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kimber I, Basketter D A, Gerberick G F, Dearman R J. Review: Allergic contact dermatitis. Int Immunopharmacol 2002: 2: 201-211.
2. Kimber I, Cumberbatch M, Dearman R J, Bhushan M, Griffiths C E. Cytokines and chemokines in the initiation and regulation of epidermal Langerhans cell mobilization. Br J Dermatol 2000: 142: 410-441.
3. Dearman R J, Basketter D A, Kimber I. Local lymph node assay - use in hazard and risk assessment. J Appl Toxicol 1999: 19: 299-306.
4. Gerberick G F, Ryan C A, Kimber I, Dearman R J, Lea L J, Basketter D A. Local lymph node assay validation assessment for regulatory purposes. Am J Contact Dermat 2000: 11: 3-18.
5. Basketter D A, Evans P, Fielder R J, Gerberick G F, Dearman R J, Kimber I. Local lymph node assay - validation and use in practice. Food Chem Toxicol 2002: 40: 593-598.
6. Kimber I, Dearman R J, Scholes E W, Basketter D A. The local lymph node assay, developments and applications. Toxicology 1994: 93: 13-31.
7. Kimber I, Dearman R J, Basketter D A, Ryan C A, Gerberick G F. The local lymph node assay: past, present and future. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 47: 315-328.
8. OECD. Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals. Guideline No. 429. Skin Sensitisation: the Local Lymph Node Assay. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 2002.
9. Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) Report. The Murine Local Lymph Node Assay: A Test Method for Assessing the Allergic Contact Dermatitis Potential of Chemicals/Compounds. Research Triangle Park, NC: NIH Publication no. 99-4494 1999.
10. Balls M, Hellsten E. Statement on the validity of the local lymph node assay for skin sensitisation testing. ECVAM Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy, 21 March. ATLA 2000: 28: 366-367.
11. Kimber I, Basketter D A, Butler M et al. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. Food Chem Toxicol 2003: 41: 1799-1809.
12. Basketter D A, Lea L J, Cooper K et al. A comparison of statistical approaches to derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose-responses. J Appl Toxicol 1999: 19: 261-266.
13. Barratt M D, Basketter D A, Chamberlain M, Payne M P, Admans G D, Langowski J J. Development of expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. Toxicol In Vitro 1994: 8: 1053-1060.
14. Potts R O, Guy R H. Predicting skin permeability. Pharm Res 1992: 9: 663-669.
15. Moriguchi I, Hirono S, Liu Q, Nakagome I, Matsushuta Y. Simple method of calculating octanol water partition-coefficient. Chem Pharm Bull 1992: 40: 127-130.
16. Basketter D A, Gerberick G F, Kimber I, Loveless S E. The local lymph node assay - A viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. Food Chem Toxicol 1996: 34: 985-997.
17. Ryan C A, Gerberick G F, Cruse L W et al. Activity of human contact allergens in the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 43: 95-102.
18. Loveless S E, Ladics G S, Gerberick G F et al. Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. Toxicology 1996: 108: 141-152.
19. Kimber I, Hilton J, Dearman R J et al. An international evaluation of the local lymph node assay and comparison of modified procedures. Toxicology 1995: 103: 63-73.
20. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) Technical Report 87. Contact Sensitization: Classification According to Potency. Brussels, 2003.
21. Bos J D, Meinardi M M H M. The 500 Dalton rule for skin penetration of chemical compounds and drugs. Exp Dermatol 2000: 9: 165-169.
22. Smith-Pease C K, Basketter D A, Patlewicz G Y. Contact allergy: The role of skin chemistry and metabolism. Clin Exp Dermatol 2003: 2: 177-183.
23. Balls M, Blaauboer B J, Fentem J H et al. Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. ATLA 1995: 23: 129-147.
24. Smith C K, Hotchkiss S A. Allergic Contact Dermatitis. Chemical and Metabolic Mechanisms. Taylor & Francis, London, 2001.
25. Lepoittevin J-P, Basketter D A, Goossens A, Karlberg A-T. Allergic Contact Dermatitis: the Molecular Basis. Springer, Berlin, 1998.
26. Robinson M K, Gerberick G F, Ryan C A, McNamee P, White I R, Basketter D A. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 251-259.
27. Basketter D A, Blaikie L, Dearman R J et al. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 344-348.
28. Gerberick G F, Robinson M K, Ryan C A et al. Contact allergenic potency: Correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Am J Contact Dermat 2001: 12: 156-161.
29. Dearman R J, Hilton J, Evans P, Harvey P, Basketter D A, Kimber I. Temporal stability of local lymph node assay responses to hexyl cinnamic aldehyde. J Appl Toxicol 1998: 18: 281-284.
30. Dearman R J, Wright Z M, Basketter D A, Ryan C A, Gerberick G F, Kimber I. The suitability of hexyl cinnamic aldehyde as a calibrant for the murine local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 357-361.
31. Basketter D A, Goodwin B F J. Investigation of the prohapten concept: cross reaction between 1,4-disubstituted benzene derivatives in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 19: 248-253.
32. Hotchkiss S. Dermal metabolism. In: Dermal Absorption and Toxicity Assessment. Drugs and the Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol. 91, Robberts M S, Walters K A (eds): Marcel Dekker, New York, 1998: 43-101.
33. Majeti V A, Suskind R R. Mechanism of cinnamaldehyde sensitization. Contact Dermatitis 1977: 3: 16-18.
34. Bertrand F, Basketter D A, Roberts D W, Lepoittevin J-P. Skin sensitization to eugenol and isoeugenol in mice: possible metabolic pathways involving ortho-quinone and quinone methide intermediates. Chem Res Toxicol 1997: 10: 335-343.
35. Gerberick G F, Robinson M K. A skin sensitization risk assessment approach for evaluation of new ingredients and products. Am J Contact Dermat 2000: 11: 65-73.
36. Ashby J, Basketter D A, Patton D, Kimber I. Structure activity relationships in skin sensitization using the murine local lymph node assay. Toxicology 1995: 103: 177-194.
37. Basketter D A, Gerberick G F, Kimber I. Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests. Food Chem Toxicol 1998: 36: 327-333.
38. Basketter D A, Scholes E W. Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. Food Chem Toxicol 1992: 30: 65-69.
39. Kimber I, Hilton J, Dearman R J et al. Assessment of the skin sensitization potential of topical medicaments using the local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation. J Toxicol Environ Health 1998: 53: 563-579.
40. Basketter D A, Scholes E W, Kimber I. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test. Food Chem Toxicol 1994: 32: 543-547.
41. Basketter D A, Wright Z M, Warbrick E V et al. Human potency predictions for aldehydes using the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 45: 89-94.
42. Wright Z M, Basketter D A, Blaikie L et al. Vehicle effects on skin sensitizing potency of four chemicals: assessment using the local lymph node assay. Int J Cosmetic Sci 2001: 23: 75-83.
43. Hilton J, Dearman R J, Harvey P, Evans P, Basketter D A, Kimber I. Estimation of relative skin sensitization potency using the local lymph node assay: A comparison of formaldehyde with gluteraldehyde. Am J Contact Dermat 1998: 9: 29-33.
44. Warbrick E V, Dearman R J, Lea L J, Basketter D A, Kimber I. Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: Intra- and inter-laboratory evaluations. J Appl Toxicol 1999: 19: 255-260.
45. Warbrick E V, Dearman R J, Basketter D A, Kimber I. Influence of application vehicle on skin sensitization to methylchloroisothiazolinone/ methylisothiazolinone; an analysis using the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 1999: 41: 325-329.