Affordances of online technologies: More than the properties of the technology

Australian Educational Computing

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 17-21

  Day, David ^a   Lloyd, Margaret ^b  

^a Hawker College   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 55849095140     PISSN: 08169020     EISSN: 08169020     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. In T. Anderson & E Elloumni (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning (pp. 3-32), Athabasca: Athabasca University Press. Retrieved October 1, 2005, from http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/
2. Anderson, T. (2004). Towards a theory of online learning. In T. Anderson & E Elloumni (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning (pp. 33-60), Athabasca: Athabasca University Press. Retrieved October 1, 2005, from http://cde.athabascau.ca/online_book/
3. Barsky, E. & Purdon, M. (2006). Introducing Web 2.0: Social networking and social bookmarking for health librarians. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 27, 65-67.
4. Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). Understanding and using technological affordances: A response to Boyle and Cook. ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology, 12, 3, 301-308.
5. de Figueiredo, A. D., & Afonso, A. P. (2006). Context and learning: A philosophical framework. In A. D. de Figueiredo & A. P Afonso (Eds.), Managing learning in virtual settings: The role of context (pp. 1-22). London: Information Science Publishing.
6. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century. London: Routledge-Falmer.
7. Gaver, W. W. (1991). Technological affordances. Paper presented at the CHI' 91, ACM, New York.
8. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
9. Gunawardena, C. N., & Mclsaac, M. S. (2004). Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 355-395). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10, 1&2, 101-116.
11. Lockee, B., Moore, M., & Burton, J. (2001). Old concerns with new distance education research. Retrieved September 16, 2005, from http://www.educause. edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0126.pdf
12. McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000, Montreal, pp. 179-186.
13. Moschkovich, J. N., & Brenner, M. E. (2000). Integrating a naturalistic paradigm into research on mathematics and science cognition and learning. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 457-486). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Norman, D. A. (1988). The' psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
15. O'Reilly, T. (2006). What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved May 4, 2006, from http://www. oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/whatis-web-20.html
16. Price, K. (2006). Web 2.0 and education: What it means for us all. Paper presented at the Australian Computer Education Conference, It's Up Here for Thinking!, 2-4 October, Cairns, Australia.
17. Smith, P L., & Dillon, C. L. (1999). Comparing distance learning and classroom learning: Conceptual considerations. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13, 2, 6-23.
18. Underwood, J., & Dillon, G. (2004). Capturing complexity through maturity modelling. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 2, 213-225.
19. Warren, W. H. (1995). Constructing an econiche. In J. Flach, R Hancock, J. Caird & K.J. Vicente (Eds.), Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems (pp. 210-237). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Webb, M. E. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: Implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 6, 705-735.
21. Webb, M. E., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 3, 235-286.
22. Wijekumar, K.J., Meyer, B. J. E., Wagoner, D., & Ferguson, L. (2006). Technology affordances: The 'real story' in research with K-12 and undergraduate learners. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 2, 191-209.