Wss1 is a SUMO-dependent isopeptidase that interacts genetically with the Slx5-Slx8 SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 30, Issue 15, 2010, Pages 3737-3748

  Mullen, Janet R ^a   Chen, Chi Fu ^a   Brill, Steven J ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HELICASE; METALLOPROTEINASE; PROTEASOME; SUMO PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WSS1 PROTEIN; ISOPEPTIDASE; LYASE; UBIQUITIN;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE INTERACTION; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUMOYLATION; YEAST; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PROTEIN PROCESSING;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CARBON-NITROGEN LYASES; DNA HELICASES; PROTEASOME ENDOPEPTIDASE COMPLEX; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 77955286868     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01649-09     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Alam, S. L., J. Sun, M. Payne, B. D. Welch, B. K. Blake, D. R. Davis, H. H. Meyer, S. D. Emr, and W. I. Sundquist. 2004. Ubiquitin interactions of NZF zinc fingers. EMBO J. 23:1411-1421.
2. Bachant, J., A. Alcasabas, Y. Blat, N. Kleckner, and S. J. Elledge. 2002. The SUMO-1 isopeptidase Smt4 is linked to centromeric cohesion through SUMO-1 modification of DNA topoisomerase II. Mol. Cell 9:1169-1182. (Pubitemid 34722297)
3. Biggins, S., N. Bhalla, A. Chang, D. L. Smith, and A. W. Murray. 2001. Genes involved in sister chromatid separation and segregation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 159:453-470.
4. Branzei, D., J. Sollier, G. Liberi, X. Zhao, D. Maeda, M. Seki, T. Enomoto, K. Ohta, and M. Foiani. 2006. Ubc9- and Mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509-522.
5. Burgess, R. C., S. Rahman, M. Lisby, R. Rothstein, and X. Zhao. 2007. The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6153-6162.
6. Bylebyl, G. R., I. Belichenko, and E. S. Johnson. 2003. The SUMO isopeptidase Ulp2 prevents accumulation of SUMO chains in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 278:44113-44120.
7. Chen, C. F., and S. J. Brill. 2007. Binding and activation of DNA topoisomerase III by the Rmi1 subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 282:28971-28979.
8. Chen, X. L., A. Reindle, and E. S. Johnson. 2005. Misregulation of 2μm circle copy number in a SUMO pathway mutant. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:4311-4320.
9. Chen, X. L., H. R. Silver, L. Xiong, I. Belichenko, C. Adegite, and E. S. Johnson. 2007. Topoisomerase I-dependent viability loss in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in both SUMO conjugation and DNA repair. Genetics 177:17-30.
10. Dobson, M. J., A. J. Pickett, S. Velmurugan, J. B. Pinder, L. A. Barrett, M. Jayaram, and J. S. Chew. 2005. The 2μm plasmid causes cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a mutation in Ulp1 protease. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:4299-4310.
11. Eladad, S., T. Z. Ye, P. Hu, M. Leversha, S. Beresten, M. J. Matunis, and N. A. Ellis. 2005. Intra-nuclear trafficking of the BLM helicase to DNA damage-induced foci is regulated by SUMO modification. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14:1351-1365.
12. Gelperin, D. M., M. A. White, M. L. Wilkinson, Y. Kon, L. A. Kung, K. J. Wise, N. Lopez-Hoyo, L. Jiang, S. Piccirillo, H. Yu, M. Gerstein, M. E. Dumont, E. M. Phizicky, M. Snyder, and E. J. Grayhack. 2005. Biochemical and genetic analysis of the yeast proteome with a movable ORF collection. Genes Dev. 19:2816-2826.
13. Guldener, U., S. Heck, T. Fielder, J. Beinhauer, and J. H. Hegemann. 1996. A new efficient gene disruption cassette for repeated use in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 24:2519-2524. (Pubitemid 26237149)
14. Hannich, J. T., A. Lewis, M. B. Kroetz, S. J. Li, H. Heide, A. Emili, and M. Hochstrasser. 2005. Defining the SUMO-modified proteome by multiple approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280:4102-4110.
15. Hoege, C., B. Pfander, G. L. Moldovan, G. Pyrowolakis, and S. Jentsch. 2002. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419:135-141. (Pubitemid 35025438)
16. Ii, T., J. Fung, J. R. Mullen, and S. J. Brill. 2007. The yeast Slx5-Slx8 DNA integrity complex displays ubiquitin ligase activity. Cell Cycle 6:2800-2809. (Pubitemid 350277173)
17. Ii, T., J. R. Mullen, C. E. Slagle, and S. J. Brill. 2007. Stimulation of in vitro sumoylation by Slx5-Slx8: evidence for a functional interaction with the SUMO pathway. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6:1679-1691. (Pubitemid 47600112)
18. Iyer, L. M., E. V. Koonin, and L. Aravind. 2004. Novel predicted peptidases with a potential role in the ubiquitin signaling pathway. Cell Cycle 3:1440-1450.
19. Johnson, E. S. 2004. Protein modification by SUMO. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:355-382.
20. Kerscher, O., R. Felberbaum, and M. Hochstrasser. 2006. Modification of proteins by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 22:159-180.
21. Kosoy, A., T. M. Calonge, E. A. Outwin, and M. J. O'Connell. 2007. Fission yeast Rnf4 homologs are required for DNA repair. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 20388-20394.
22. Kroetz, M. B., D. Su, and M. Hochstrasser. 2009. Essential role of nuclear localization for yeast Ulp2 SUMO protease function. Mol. Biol. Cell 20: 2196-2206.
23. Lallemand-Breitenbach, V., M. Jeanne, S. Benhenda, R. Nasr, M. Lei, L. Peres, J. Zhou, J. Zhu, B. Raught, and H. de The. 2008. Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:547-555.
24. Li, S. J., and M. Hochstrasser. 1999. A new protease required for cell-cycle progression in yeast. Nature 398:246-251. (Pubitemid 29142860)
25. Li, S. J., and M. Hochstrasser. 2003. The Ulp1 SUMO isopeptidase: distinct domains required for viability, nuclear envelope localization, and substrate specificity. J. Cell Biol. 160:1069-1081.
26. Li, S. J., and M. Hochstrasser. 2000. The yeast ULP2 (SMT4) gene encodes a novel protease specific for the ubiquitin-like Smt3 protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2367-2377.
27. Lima, C. D., and D. Reverter. 2008. Structure of the human SENP7 catalytic domain and poly-SUMO deconjugation activities for SENP6 and SENP7. J. Biol. Chem. 283:32045-32055.
28. Makhnevych, T., Y. Sydorskyy, X. Xin, T. Srikumar, F. J. Vizeacoumar, S. M. Jeram, Z. Li, S. Bahr, B. J. Andrews, C. Boone, and B. Raught. 2009. Global map of SUMO function revealed by protein-protein interaction and genetic networks. Mol. Cell 33:124-135.
29. Matunis, M. J., J. Wu, and G. Blobel. 1998. SUMO-1 modification and its role in targeting the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP1, to the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 140:499-509.
30. Meyer, H. H., Y. Wang, and G. Warren. 2002. Direct binding of ubiquitin conjugates by the mammalian p97 adaptor complexes, p47 and Ufd1-Npl4. EMBO J. 21:5645-5652.
31. Motegi, A., K. Kuntz, A. Majeed, S. Smith, and K. Myung. 2006. Regulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by ubiquitin and SUMO ligases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:1424-1433.
32. Mukhopadhyay, D., F. Ayaydin, N. Kolli, S. H. Tan, T. Anan, A. Kametaka, Y. Azuma, K. D. Wilkinson, and M. Dasso. 2006. SUSP1 antagonizes formation of highly SUMO2/3-conjugated species. J. Cell Biol. 174:939-949.
33. Mukhopadhyay, D., and M. Dasso. 2007. Modification in reverse: the SUMO proteases. Trends Biochem. Sci. 32:286-295.
34. Mullen, J. R., and S. J. Brill. 2008. Activation of the Slx5-Slx8 ubiquitin ligase by poly-SUMO conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 283:19912-19921.
35. Mullen, J. R., V. Kaliraman, S. S. Ibrahim, and S. J. Brill. 2001. Requirement for three novel protein complexes in the absence of the Sgs1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157:103-118.
36. O'Neill, B. M., D. Hanway, E. A. Winzeler, and F. E. Romesberg. 2004. Coordinated functions of WSS1, PSY2 and TOF1 in the DNA damage response. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:6519-6530.
37. Pan, X., P. Ye, D. S. Yuan, X. Wang, J. S. Bader, and J. D. Boeke. 2006. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124:1069-1081.
38. Papouli, E., S. Chen, A. A. Davies, D. Huttner, L. Krejci, P. Sung, and H. D. Ulrich. 2005. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 19:123-133.
39. Pfander, B., G. L. Moldovan, M. Sacher, C. Hoege, and S. Jentsch. 2005. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436:428-433. (Pubitemid 41059056)
40. Prudden, J., S. Pebernard, G. Raffa, D. A. Slavin, J. J. Perry, J. A. Tainer, C. H. McGowan, and M. N. Boddy. 2007. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J. 26:4089-4101.
41. Rog, O., K. M. Miller, M. G. Ferreira, and J. P. Cooper. 2009. Sumoylation of RecQ helicase controls the fate of dysfunctional telomeres. Mol. Cell 33:559-569.
42. Rose, M. D., F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
43. Schauber, C., L. Chen, P. Tongaonkar, I. Vega, D. Lambertson, W. Potts, and K. Madura. 1998. Rad23 links DNA repair to the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Nature 391:715-718. (Pubitemid 28113221)
44. Schwienhorst, I., E. S. Johnson, and R. J. Dohmen. 2000. SUMO conjugation and deconjugation. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:771-786.
45. Soustelle, C., L. Vernis, K. Freon, A. Reynaud-Angelin, R. Chanet, F. Fabre, and M. Heude. 2004. A new Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with a mutant Smt3-deconjugating Ulp1 protein is affected in DNA replication and requires Srs2 and homologous recombination for its viability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:5130-5143.
46. Strunnikov, A. V., L. Aravind, and E. V. Koonin. 2001. Saccharomyces cerevisiae SMT4 encodes an evolutionarily conserved protease with a role in chromosome condensation regulation. Genetics 158:95-107.
47. Sun, H., J. D. Leverson, and T. Hunter. 2007. Conserved function of RNF4 family proteins in eukaryotes: targeting a ubiquitin ligase to SUMOylated proteins. EMBO J. 26:4102-4112.
48. Tatham, M. H., M. C. Geoffroy, L. Shen, A. Plechanovova, N. Hattersley, E. G. Jaffray, J. J. Palvimo, and R. T. Hay. 2008. RNF4 is a poly-SUMOspecific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenic-induced PML degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:538-546.
49. Tong, A. H., M. Evangelista, A. B. Parsons, H. Xu, G. D. Bader, N. Page, M. Robinson, S. Raghibizadeh, C. W. Hogue, H. Bussey, B. Andrews, M. Tyers, and C. Boone. 2001. Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294:2364-2368.
50. Tsalik, E. L., and M. R. Gartenberg. 1998. Curing Saccharomyces cerevisiae of the 2 micron plasmid by targeted DNA damage. Yeast 14:847-852.
51. Uzunova, K., K. Gottsche, M. Miteva, S. R. Weisshaar, C. Glanemann, M. Schnellhardt, M. Niessen, H. Scheel, K. Hofmann, E. S. Johnson, G. J. Praefcke, and R. J. Dohmen. 2007. Ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic control of SUMO conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 282:34167-34175.
52. Wang, Z., G. M. Jones, and G. Prelich. 2006. Genetic analysis connects SLX5 and SLX8 to the SUMO pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 172:1499-1509.
53. Wang, Z., and G. Prelich. 2009. Quality control of a transcriptional regulator by SUMO-targeted degradation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:1694-1706.
54. Xie, Y., O. Kerscher, M. B. Kroetz, H. F. McConchie, P. Sung, and M. Hochstrasser. 2007. The yeast HEX3-SLX8 heterodimer is a ubiquitin ligase stimulated by substrate sumoylation. J. Biol. Chem. 282:34176-34184.
55. Xie, Y., E. M. Rubenstein, T. Matt, and M. Hochstrasser. 2010. SUMO-independent in vivo activity of a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase toward a short-lived transcription factor. Genes Dev. 24:893-903.
56. Xiong, L., X. L. Chen, H. R. Silver, N. T. Ahmed, and E. S. Johnson. 2009. Deficient SUMO attachment to Flp recombinase leads to homologous recombination-dependent hyperamplification of the yeast 2 micron circle plasmid. Mol. Biol. Cell 20:1241-1251.
57. Zhang, X.-D., J. Goeres, H. Zhang, T. J. Yen, A. C. G. Porter, and M. J. Matunis. 2008. SUMO-2/3 modification and binding regulate the association of CENP-E with kinetochores and progression through mitosis. Mol. Cell 29:729-741.